Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Ranks - Bring them Back!!!
  • Subject: Ranks - Bring them Back!!!
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Ranks - Bring them Back!!!

And so God called Moses to come forth but he came fifth and was therefore disqualified.


Posted by: Colingo
1-50 was trash. cR are trash.


Man, it's all trash, isn't it?

  • 01.03.2012 4:59 PM PDT

I intend to live forever, or die trying,

so far, so good.


Posted by: KagaiTsuki
not happening, 343 already said


Really, that sucks. Were they talking about Halo 4?

Can you link Quote.



[Edited on 01.03.2012 5:08 PM PST]

  • 01.03.2012 5:07 PM PDT

私はルルーシュViにブリタニア時、私のコマンドに従う!

ピカレスク

I'm sure Bungie will have ranks in its upcoming MMOFPS.

Just don't expect them to be named, nor be limited to 1-50.

  • 01.03.2012 5:08 PM PDT

私はルルーシュViにブリタニア時、私のコマンドに従う!

ピカレスク


Posted by: THOMSY99

Posted by: KagaiTsuki
not happening, 343 already said


Really, that sucks. Were they talking about Halo 4?

Can you link Quote.


I can't get you the quote, but I can tell you that they just don't want to devote the resources it would take because they want to keep going on H4 (that's what they said about it).

  • 01.03.2012 5:09 PM PDT

I intend to live forever, or die trying,

so far, so good.


Posted by: turbanator17
I want to bring up ranks. I know this has been discussed in other threads but bungie and 343 need to bring back ranks for Halo 4. Dropping the ranking system they used in Halo 2 and Halo 3 for the one in Reach is to me and thousands of other halo players a horrible decision. They followed the ranking system in Call of Duty, you play a lot and no matter how good you are, you go up in rank.
If you don't know what I'm on about watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpOyb5vRuSE - a video from Pro player Ninja. He brings up some very good points in why the ranking system from Halo 2 and 3 needs to be brought back.
Some people didn't like the ranking system in halo 3 and 2 because people who get 50s are cocky and dumb asses. To be honest some of them are but like 95% are not. They to win that's why they're 50s.
But halo 3 fixed that with their exp ranking system so players who cant get a high skill 50 can get a 5 star general in EXP and people who have 50s can show off even further that they have a 5 star general in exp and a 50 in a playlist.
I ranting on a lot about this because the old ranking system especially the one in Halo 3 is what made Halo multiplayer way different and better from other top selling multiplayer games. Now every multiplayer game is like the same nothing stands out of the crowd.


The updated Halo 3 Ranking system was good. I would like to see this in Halo 4.

As EXP for games played is good. But True Skill helps stops a really great team matching against a really bad team, unless they are playing social.

  • 01.03.2012 5:10 PM PDT

I intend to live forever, or die trying,

so far, so good.


Posted by: Vi Britannia

Posted by: THOMSY99

Posted by: KagaiTsuki
not happening, 343 already said


Really, that sucks. Were they talking about Halo 4?

Can you link Quote.


I can't get you the quote, but I can tell you that they just don't want to devote the resources it would take because they want to keep going on H4 (that's what they said about it).


Thanks, hopefully they will add a True Skill system, I think it will improve the game.

I love REACH, but I play BTB with some really good players and we play well as a Team, and 90% of games we Win easily. The best games are the ones were win or lose are close all the way. You get this with a good True Skill Ranking system. And if you want some easy games, play social.

  • 01.03.2012 5:13 PM PDT

And so God called Moses to come forth but he came fifth and was therefore disqualified.

If I had a nickel for every complaint made in the forums...

I could buy the company and fix all of your "Problems".

  • 01.03.2012 5:14 PM PDT

As EXP for games played is good. But True Skill helps stops a really great team matching against a really bad team, unless they are playing social.[/quote]

Teams playing people alone, like team of 4 vs 4 random makes reach's system even worse. Halo 3 only paired a random single player against a team if there wasn't any other game open.

I'm not totally sure about his but I think rank did make a difference in who play in social as well as ranked. Because i remember as a level 1 starting off in H3 I played mostly similar ranked people with the random 40 in there. And when i got a 50 General I played more 50s in social.

  • 01.03.2012 6:42 PM PDT

I know this may sound like I am making fun of you. But I'm not, from looking at most of the people's comments saying the H3 system was bad, I can see didn't play competitively.
None of you are above high skill 45 in H3 which means you don't get that Halo is a skill based game and you don't understand why people who want ranks back want them so badly.
I'm a 50 and play at that level all time, and ranks separate the good from the bad so the bad don't matched up with players that are so much better that they perfections and huge multi's on the bad kids.
I saying this to make a point no to make a fun of bad kids just showing there has to be separation.

  • 01.05.2012 6:13 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3