- gamertag: mlp256
- user homepage:
Posted by: hellstorm5
These are just the facts people.
Let me stop you right there.
Permanent reticle (no bloom) ---(vs.)--- Expanding reticle (bloom)
While Halo 1/2/3 had static reticles, believe or not they still effectively had bloom.
No armor abilities (had to earn perks by picking them up) ---(vs.)--- 5 armor abilities (perks are given to you)
That one is correct.
Shields only ---(vs.)--- Shields and health
Halo 1 had health as well. Have you ever played Halo 1?
Mostly skill based ranking system ---(vs.)--- Mostly game time based ranking system
Halo 1: What ranking system?
Halo 2: Correct.
Halo 3: Correct but at the same time, incorrect. The system was highly exploitable.
No fall damage ---(vs.)--- Fall damage (that also stuns you)
Halo 1 had fall damage, once again, have you ever played Halo 1?
3 bullet burst BR (Halo 2 & 3) ---(vs.)--- Single shot DMR
Correct, but how does that make Halo: Reach not a Halo game?
Sniper head shots rare ---(vs.)--- Sniper head shots common (almost expected)
Hitscan,
Halo 1/3: head shot = head shot, body shot or miss.
Halo 2/Reach: head shot = head shot.
Vehicles very hard to flip when driving ---(vs.)--- Vehicles very easy to flip when driving
It is incredibly easy to flip vehicles while driving them in Halo 1.
Can't flip vehicles by shooting them with basic weapons ---(vs.)--- Can flip vehicles with one DMR shot
I have never noticed this.
Here is my suggestion, get your facts right before stating said facts.