Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: "Organized" teams of Bad Players are Still Bad
  • Subject: "Organized" teams of Bad Players are Still Bad
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: "Organized" teams of Bad Players are Still Bad
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nope you're bad.

Even when groups of bad players come together to organize and play matchmaking, they're still bad. "Skill" is nothing more than what you can contribute to the team, and these players are simply skill-less. These groups have been popping up for a while in BTB and you have no reason to even consider yourself a "team".

The most recent example I've seen of this is "The Unyielding Citadel". While the name itself lets you know its players are bad, a group of actually good players would steamroll these guys just like the randoms in matchmaking.

Some good teams are criticized for not practicing enough. The reason we don't have to practice is because we can still annihilate you guys regardless of what you do.

Qualities of a Good Player:
Single Digit Onyx in Arena (other than S8)
500+ Games in MLG with a win percentage better than 70%




[Edited on 01.11.2012 2:24 PM PST]

  • 01.11.2012 1:39 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nope you're bad.


Posted by: Destiny 7
Nice blog you got there.


Nice awful stats you got there.


[Edited on 01.11.2012 1:48 PM PST]

  • 01.11.2012 1:46 PM PDT

Mediocre Backpacker
56% W\L
2.86 k\d
3.18 DMR
7.29 God Magnum
7.79 Sniper
5.34 Needle Rifle

They'll still roflstomp uncoordinated randoms. Garbage on their own of course.

  • 01.11.2012 1:55 PM PDT


Posted by: Destiny 7
Nice blog you got there.

  • 01.11.2012 1:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nope you're bad.


Posted by: xSmoothmouse

Posted by: Destiny 7
Nice blog you got there.


Nice bird perch random.

  • 01.11.2012 1:57 PM PDT

Reach makes me want to gargle gasoline whiling jerking myself off with sandpaper.

Okay.

  • 01.11.2012 1:58 PM PDT

@McBlogs: LOL What?

Thank-you.

But seriously what is the point to this thread?

[Edited on 01.11.2012 1:59 PM PST]

  • 01.11.2012 1:59 PM PDT

Reach makes me want to gargle gasoline whiling jerking myself off with sandpaper.

Posted by: xSmoothmouse
@McBlogs: LOL What?
Bird perch = Brig

  • 01.11.2012 2:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: UT MasterRace
i agree.

  • 01.11.2012 2:06 PM PDT

Want a cool clan? Join FRAG!

Want a war sim? The best war sim in Halo, Forerunner Conflict.


Posted by: Killer VVhale

Posted by: UT MasterRace
i agree.

  • 01.11.2012 2:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: ClearOrangeZero

Posted by: Killer VVhale

Posted by: UT MasterRace
i agree.

  • 01.11.2012 2:23 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Mythic Member
  • gamertag: P3P5I
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Achronos
It isn't our shiznit anymore.

Qualities of a Good Player:
Single Digit Onyx in Arena (other than S8)
500+ Games in MLG with a win percentage better than 70%
Needs moar Onyx Downshift

  • 01.11.2012 2:31 PM PDT

The Song Of Nephilim

Xenoblade <3

Wow, you sure care too much.

  • 01.11.2012 3:08 PM PDT

Forget it man, and get with the countdown. Shake this square world and blast off for Kicksville.

Reach host ranking algorithm: (a*quit_percentage + b*isMexican + c*(1/KDR) + d*hasGuest) * 100
where a > b = d > c

Posted by: Nephilim713
Wow, you sure care too much.

You're so cool. I hope I can be as cool as you one day.

  • 01.11.2012 3:10 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member

I disagree with the requirements of being "good"

  • 01.11.2012 3:13 PM PDT


Posted by: Peco
I disagree with the requirements of being "good"

Same, I have played barely any arena or mlg and I could probably beat 70% of this forum in a one on one..

  • 01.11.2012 3:18 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Wumpa Warrior

Posted by: Peco
I disagree with the requirements of being "good"

Same, I have played barely any arena or mlg and I could probably beat 70% of this forum in a one on one..
99% of the people on this forum are bad.

  • 01.11.2012 3:20 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member


Posted by: DMR

Posted by: Wumpa Warrior

Posted by: Peco
I disagree with the requirements of being "good"

Same, I have played barely any arena or mlg and I could probably beat 70% of this forum in a one on one..
99% of the people on this forum are bad.
Though true, I still disagree with the requirements

  • 01.11.2012 3:21 PM PDT

Forget it man, and get with the countdown. Shake this square world and blast off for Kicksville.

Reach host ranking algorithm: (a*quit_percentage + b*isMexican + c*(1/KDR) + d*hasGuest) * 100
where a > b = d > c

I think you should just drop the first requirement. The latter outright exceeds it.

  • 01.11.2012 3:23 PM PDT


Posted by: DMR

What I'm getting at, is that the requirements are very biased.. Is it not possible to be "good" at driving? Or "good" at objective? Objective players don't get enough credit..

  • 01.11.2012 3:25 PM PDT

At least they are playing as a team.

  • 01.11.2012 3:27 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member


Posted by: Wumpa Warrior

Posted by: DMR

What I'm getting at, is that the requirements are very biased.. Is it not possible to be "good" at driving? Or "good" at objective? Objective players don't get enough credit..
as with a lot of things, good seems to be subjective

  • 01.11.2012 3:27 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3