Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: nope ur bad
  • Subject: nope ur bad
Subject: nope ur bad
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

It's okay Reach forum, you'll always be on level 1 arguing in my book. Link

  • 01.11.2012 2:23 PM PDT

No you.

  • 01.11.2012 2:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Nope you're bad.

  • 01.11.2012 2:24 PM PDT

Nope, you're worse.

  • 01.11.2012 2:25 PM PDT

That's a PrEttY sIcK UsErNaMe bRo.

[Edited on 01.11.2012 2:27 PM PST]

  • 01.11.2012 2:26 PM PDT

You want a sandwich? Sure. As long as you don't mind me putting poison in it.

Yeah. I use the AR, so what? All you can do is scream and rage about me using the weapon.


Posted by: mr pie123
Nope, you're worse.

  • 01.11.2012 2:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Banned just for calling someone retarded? lolBnet mods
Duardo = retard

So you think Reach is an actual Halo game, huh? LOL
Jesus! There's a BoB in ma Falcon!

3/10

  • 01.11.2012 2:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

*wonders how New Clan Recruitment For Shadow Pack thread gets 55 replies*

*reads "Hi I'm Ashley. . ." *

[Question Answered]

*proceeds to read on, shakes head, and gently laughs*

The author's main point seems to be wrong. As he says:
Posted by: Celebratory
It's okay Reach forum, you'll always be on level 1 arguing in my book. Link
But this is wrong for the following reasons:
Most people are at level 0 (DH0).
lulz

  • 01.11.2012 2:34 PM PDT

Ad hominem counter arguments are viable when speaking about a skill based activity. If a master carpenter was building a house and his apprentice said "we don't need steel joists" an appropriate response would be "nope you're bad". Could he elaborate? Of corse but that doesn't change the validity of "nope you're bad".

  • 01.11.2012 2:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.

Lol people who need notes on how to make intelligent discussion.

I laugh at users who need assistance in order to properly debate.

Now I may be a very serious person in my daily life, but I find great amusement at the original poster's apparent need of assistance in order to properly partake in mature discussion of topics.

[Edited on 01.11.2012 2:45 PM PST]

  • 01.11.2012 2:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

*wonders how New Clan Recruitment For Shadow Pack thread gets 55 replies*

*reads "Hi I'm Ashley. . ." *

[Question Answered]

*proceeds to read on, shakes head, and gently laughs*


Posted by: xmat123x

Posted by: Sgt Commando
The author's main point seems to be wrong. As he says:
Posted by: Celebratory
It's okay Reach forum, you'll always be on level 1 arguing in my book. Link
But this is wrong for the following reasons:
Most people are at level 0 (DH0).
lulz
Ad Hominem is probably the most overused one since people can stats check.

"Of course he would want lolReach settings in BTB. His kd is under 1,0."
Just a joke . . .

  • 01.11.2012 2:47 PM PDT