- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Abolitionofman
I never claimed to know my guns, I was speaking purely on monetary and economic terms. What I read about guns, I understand granted, but I by no means claim to be even a novice in those terms.
Simply put, you took it out of context. The point was if this gun is so "great" then pulling money from specific regions where it is inefficient (and if you understood economics this would make sense) and put it where it would be MOST efficient (ie something that works), and on top of it all, there would be more efficiency due to the producer surplus of the gun (and a lot of consumer surplus as well) from the lower price and durability of this gun. That is, as it is on paper and from various "interviews" I just casually watched.
Just to let you know, when I said "If you know your guns", I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about an military personel of North America. I wasn't questioning you or challenging you in any manor in that statement. I dont know where you got that from? I was simply speaking in generaly for those who have fired weapons and use them frequently, many believe the M16 is unreliably because it jams, but manage your gun and it wont happen.