- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Spartan9807
Posted by: FFMagee
People like you baffle me. Why, would someone want a worse version of a game? If, hypothetically, you get an Xbox 1 version, you'll have worse graphics, probably 2 discs for the entire game to fit on, less features, less multiplayer options, less players in multiplayer, the pop-in during cutscenes and gameplay would be back and even worse, and ungodly long load times because the Xbox 1 is approximately 84 times worse than the 360.
Why are you so against by the 360? Is it the price? The Xbox original was $300 and people bought it for Halo 1. Do you feel entitled to make Bungie downscale the title to a system that's more difficul to make games for and would give the fans less features. Because you know what'd happen if it came on the original Xbox as well as the 360, everyone that whined about it not coming to the original Xbox would be whining about not getting all the same features and graphics as the 360 people. It'd be like PSOne fans wanting GTA:San Andreas on the PS1.
Actually, both consoles use DVD9. Unless the devs can utilize some sort of compression feature that the Xbox 360 Dev Kit uses, both consoles would use two discs if this were the case, at least how I see it.
Whoever said the processor was 700mhz, it was actually 733 if I remember correctly.
Bungie is not going to go backwards. Did you watch the announcement trailer? Try running that on an Xbox in real time. You might get 0.0001 FPS. You could slim it down, but that's a waste of time in my opinion.
Oh yeah, it's 733. Anyway, I think by mid-late 2007 the Xbox 360 will have the HD-DVD drive anyway