- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: julius_ceaser
READ WHOLE POST BEFORE REPLING!!
In halo 1 it was clearly stated that halo is a weapon that kills sentient life within a given radius to stop the flood from feeding, so that eventualy they would starve to death. Then 343 GS comfirmed that the Halo's were fired once before so technicaly their should be no life in the milky way (our galaxy) but some dumb ass decided their are humans and covenant alive in a galaxy were all life should of ciesed to exist. Then they decided that flood did not starve to death and they 'were sleeping' YEA RIGHT! like you could survive thousands of years with out food.
Then theres that theory that the foreruners kept a few flood alive to study them. whats the point in that if the foreruners were going to blow themselves to next universe? why the hell would the foreruners breach containment and keep their enemy alive but kill themselves? sound dumb? YES IT DOES!!
The simple fact of it is that the flood should not exist! and if in halo 3 the halo's do get set off again and the flood do die then my statement about the writers being sacked has to be followed through!
THE RINGS DO NOT DESTORY FLOOD!
First off, it was not stated, nor was it disputed, that the Rings were weapons. I haven't played in a while, but I'm pretty sure about that.
Second: We don't know anything about the flood physiology, maybe they don't need food to survive, only to evolve and grow. Did you ever think of that, sherlock?
The writers of Halo are way smarter than you, and they obviously have thought about this way more than you. Go dis the makers of some crap game like Dreamfall.