Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Why Reach is a Halo title to be remembered.
  • Subject: Why Reach is a Halo title to be remembered.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Why Reach is a Halo title to be remembered.


Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
inb4 343 makes worse mistakes.

That's always a possibility, but you should be more optimistic. After all, they have Frankie.


Someone quickmeme a picture of frankie

Want Halo back?

*Pulls a Reach*

  • 01.28.2012 5:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Sometimes, I dream about cheese.

hot topic!

  • 01.28.2012 5:43 PM PDT

Founder of Team Reclaimer where we specialize in Big Team Battle and Invasion games. We are all about Communication, Dedication and Fun.

http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=40922317&p ostRepeater1-p=1

lol look how everyone was praising sage. How much of the stuff in that OP did not happen?


[Edited on 01.28.2012 5:50 PM PST]

  • 01.28.2012 5:50 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Horse Repairman
RC RuNz the internet. Like the superintendent.

Posted by: SouthPoIe
Clone is an internet God.

Posted by: DerpRoids
RC Clone is the anti-thesis of a lurker.


Posted by: TenguNova
http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=40922317&p ostRepeater1-p=1

lol look how everyone was praising sage. How much of the stuff in that OP did not happen?

How do you keep finding these. lol Goat's post.

  • 01.28.2012 5:53 PM PDT

I'm in love with Jesus and proud of it!

It'll also be remembered as the worst Halo ever.

  • 01.28.2012 5:53 PM PDT

Founder of Team Reclaimer where we specialize in Big Team Battle and Invasion games. We are all about Communication, Dedication and Fun.

http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=40384783

  • 01.28.2012 5:59 PM PDT

So I take it everyone just wants the same thing everytime?

I have been a big fan of halo for many years but every halo game has its flaws, halo 3 even though good for its time now feels so clunky and ill fitting everytime I play it. 343 should NOT make halo 4 like ANY previous title, it should give the new developers a chance to start anew.

Everybody says Reach and all the new things sucked or failed but It was and still is a refreshing change, even though AA's are annoying they are a good addition which can really mix up gameplay, if 343i keep them in halo 4 I just hope they tweak them. And as for Bloom I never noticed it, but I sure as hell did notice failing bullet registration in halo 3.

I don't see why people would want to have the same halo game everytime, that is why COD was invented.

The only things I personally would like to see a return of in halo 4 are:

- Dual Wielding.
- BR, Carbine, beam rifle, SMG from halo 3 & ODST, pistol from ODST etc.
- A mix of halo 3 & Reach's ranking system - have seperate 1-50 (somehow improved so its harder if not impossible for boosters to defile) with Reach's cR ranking system ( for armour unlocks and other features)
- Armour Customisation from Reach, but improved further.
- Spartan vs Elites
- Health and shields.

Can't think of anything else, but halo reach is a good game I just think we can all agree it is not HALO. I'm not flaming anybody, just expressing my opinion. I want Halo 4 to be original while retaining classic halo games feel, but I don't want halo 1,2,3,ODST or Reach repackaged and spoon fed to us.

And please do not praise 343i yet, they haven't done anything other than a map pack and re-released halo ce which they really didn't do much with other than remove 4 player co-op and improve graphics, to me that doesn't put them off to a good start, make them WORK for our respect.

[Edited on 01.30.2012 1:11 AM PST]

  • 01.30.2012 1:07 AM PDT

Funny how people complain about the lack of change and use CoD as an example; look how successful CoD is.

The majority welcome change, but only if the change improves the game.

  • 01.30.2012 1:52 AM PDT

Posted by: Ghostie117
Funny how people complain about the lack of change and use CoD as an example; look how successful CoD is.


Yeah you could say the repitiveness of CoD marks it's success, but you forget there key demographic are the braindead, Halo has depth and a lot of room for improvement and also has unlimited possibilties, CoD just has no-scoping lol.

Posted by: UndesiredName
I don't see why people would want to have the same halo game everytime, that is why COD was invented.


[Edited on 01.30.2012 2:03 AM PST]

  • 01.30.2012 2:03 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

- First off too much customization and variety is a bad thing. Imo.

Posted by: MFROG5
But what GOOD things did Reach offer?
-A "better" armory


Armor has nothing to do with gameplay.

[Edited on 01.30.2012 2:22 AM PST]

  • 01.30.2012 2:07 AM PDT

Its not about whether the players are smart or not. Alot of Halo players are tards too, mind you.

You'll find quite a few on these forums constantly praising Halo 3, and berating just about every new feature in Reach

And still, no changes is better than bad changes.

  • 01.30.2012 2:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Ghostie117
And still, no changes is better than bad changes.


As I've said in the past.

Making change for the sake of change is a retarded concept.

Adding something new or making a change should only be done if its actually beneficial.

  • 01.30.2012 2:19 AM PDT

Well obviously Bungie didn't implement AAs, bloom, and whatnot with full knowledge of the outcome. Making changes involves risk. It can throw off the fanbase or increase it.

  • 01.30.2012 2:30 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3