Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Pros aren't so great
  • Subject: Pros aren't so great
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Pros aren't so great


Posted by: RC Clone
Posted by: Skillz Like AI
Nerds.

On a video game forum!


Mind = blown.

  • 02.01.2012 12:50 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Aesthetics is an art, your body is the canvas, weights are your brush and nutrition is your paint. We all have the ability to turn a self portrait into a masterpiece

Beyrouth, you are retarded.

Him and all his friends think they were good because they had at the least 7 playlist 50's with high exp.

They are also the ones who dislike reach due to the lack of ranks and competition. The people who flocked to reach are people like you, who can throw up a 3.0 social k/d against guests and claim to be good.

  • 02.01.2012 12:52 PM PDT

WALL OF SHAME-Posting stupidity since 2010
__________________
Posted by: Maximus Decimus
Agreed. All the changes are good and add variety. Do we really want another Halo 3? Just running around with one gun and no armor abilities? It's good that 343 wants to try something new. Do we really want the same thing for three more games?

Are you sure they were trying :P?
I don't believe you would beat a pro team if they were putting in at least some effort.

Edit: IamroF is Formal?! Just realized I played him yesterday.

[Edited on 02.01.2012 1:00 PM PST]

  • 02.01.2012 12:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: NavG123
Are you sure they were trying :P?
I don't believe you would beat a pro team if they were putting in at least some effort.

Edit: IamroF is Formal?! Just realized I played him yesterday.

Here is the game from Formal's point of view. They started trying around the high thirties when I got a nice set-up on their tower and they realized we might win.

  • 02.01.2012 1:02 PM PDT

WALL OF SHAME-Posting stupidity since 2010
__________________
Posted by: Maximus Decimus
Agreed. All the changes are good and add variety. Do we really want another Halo 3? Just running around with one gun and no armor abilities? It's good that 343 wants to try something new. Do we really want the same thing for three more games?


Posted by: Killer VVhale

Posted by: NavG123
Are you sure they were trying :P?
I don't believe you would beat a pro team if they were putting in at least some effort.

Edit: IamroF is Formal?! Just realized I played him yesterday.

Here is the game from Formal's point of view. They started trying around the high thirties when I got a nice set-up on their tower and they realized we might win.
I'll watch it in a second...

That was a good game actually. Aries got an exterm in a slayer though :(

[Edited on 02.01.2012 1:09 PM PST]

  • 02.01.2012 1:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.


Posted by: NavG123

Posted by: Killer VVhale

Posted by: NavG123
Are you sure they were trying :P?
I don't believe you would beat a pro team if they were putting in at least some effort.

Edit: IamroF is Formal?! Just realized I played him yesterday.

Here is the game from Formal's point of view. They started trying around the high thirties when I got a nice set-up on their tower and they realized we might win.
I'll watch it in a second...

That was a good game actually. Aries got an exterm in a slayer though :(

Haha I know. I spawned took one step and exploded.

  • 02.01.2012 1:11 PM PDT

I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

Naw they're not, especially when everyone knows the pistol takes the most skill and no one's even reached one thousand kills. Soon I'll have a gold commendation for side arm.

[Edited on 02.02.2012 3:00 PM PST]

  • 02.02.2012 3:09 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4