Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Evade over Sprint?
  • Subject: Evade over Sprint?
Subject: Evade over Sprint?

should sprint just be replaced with evade? I mean evade does everything that sprint does but better; whats the point of having both?

[Edited on 02.13.2012 11:03 AM PST]

  • 02.13.2012 11:03 AM PDT

Posted by: IrIsHmAn04
no its legit, i used coordinates, set weapon timers the works.

I think it depends on what gametype is being played. Sometimes evade is just annoying on some gametypes.

I prefer Sprint for Slayer gametypes myself. Not as much malarkie going on.

  • 02.13.2012 11:05 AM PDT

You can sprint longer distances and you can sprint a small distance i.e. to get just a little bit closer for a beatdown, where evade might have gone too far.

Just leave them. They're different enough.

  • 02.13.2012 11:06 AM PDT


Posted by: Wobbly_guy
You can sprint longer distances and you can sprint a small distance i.e. to get just a little bit closer for a beatdown, where evade might have gone too far.

Just leave them. They're different enough.


hmmm good point. or maybe they could shorten the evade distance and give you 3 evades instead of 2?

  • 02.13.2012 11:09 AM PDT

Forget it man, and get with the countdown. Shake this square world and blast off for Kicksville.

Reach host ranking algorithm: (a*quit_percentage + b*isMexican + c*(1/KDR) + d*hasGuest) * 100
where a > b = d > c

No. Evade is too powerful.

  • 02.13.2012 11:16 AM PDT

I say they are fine the way they are. I like them both for different reasons.

  • 02.13.2012 11:20 AM PDT