Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Remeber when bungie ran halo 3 and halo reach?...
  • Subject: Remeber when bungie ran halo 3 and halo reach?...
Subject: Remeber when bungie ran halo 3 and halo reach?...

hi

...then there was 343. And the begining of the end started. which do you guys prefer? Bungie or 343? Bungie>343.

  • 02.13.2012 1:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

My Resume
Reach Stats
Halo 3 Stats

"In Halo 3 not all 50's were good players, but all good players were 50's."

Your opinion is invalid.

Neither gives a crap about competitive players. I wish MLG had the final say in all matchmaking playlists. They would make the game right and still include all the casual aspects that players like.

Wouldn't be hard.

  • 02.13.2012 1:47 PM PDT

fear me, for i am pro sauce

i have to go for bungie, just because they made and awesome trilogy

343 havent had enough time to prove themselves, reach was a broken game, i like that 343 actually attempted to fix it with the TU and improve it with new things, but reach is a fail halo game and always will be. they should just concentrate on halo 4 now

  • 02.13.2012 2:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

RIP Bungie Service Records. You shall be missed.


Posted by: JACKsBeatenYOU
Bungie>343.

  • 02.13.2012 2:37 PM PDT

You got stuck by FalconStickr

Halo IS Bungie.

  • 02.13.2012 3:05 PM PDT