Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Do you see Halo 4 being good
  • Subject: Do you see Halo 4 being good
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Do you see Halo 4 being good

Oh, hey, look, another person who thinks Halo 4 will fail because 343 isn't trying to completely fix an unfixable game of which they didn't even make, when it's already their job to make three more Halos.

[Slams fist down on the "Destroy All Humanity" button.]

  • 02.14.2012 9:41 PM PDT

Posted by: icey yoe
I agree, sadly the jet-pack will most likely be in it based off the trailer, I don't mind it to much though, although I do not use it. One thing is wrong though, they need to fix spawns on ALL maps;). JK but a lot do need fixed.
http://halo.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Did_master_chief_have_a_je tpack_in_the_halo_4_trailer

  • 02.14.2012 9:58 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Heroic Member

http://www.bungie.net/fanclub/halohaven/Group/GroupHome.aspx

Join Halo Haven! (Group Leader: A 3 Legged Goat)

(To discuss Halo 4.)

Negative Prospect: 7.0 average, terrible disastisfaction for everyone.

Most likely Prospect: 8.0 average, good ideals, but Halo 3.5 and terrible animations etc

Positive Prospect: 9.0 average, like Reach, love hate relationship for the community as a whole.

My hope for Halo 4: 9.5 average on Metacritic Critic Reviews, truly amazing game, revamps Halo.

  • 02.14.2012 10:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I don't have high hopes for it but I do have a little because of the things they've done for MLG.

  • 02.14.2012 11:16 PM PDT

You deal with me, you deal with Tacos!


Posted by: Throttle
I myself think the game won't be much better then Reach if it's even better then Reach at all for one main reason

Bungie did not care, therefor Halo reach was not as good as it could have been.

343 cares...A little bit.... They toggle around the playlist each month but besides that they don't really do anything to change the game to help it such as:

-Take away Jetpack
-Take away Armor lock
-Take away Camo, or atleast fix the motion Jammer
-Ban Host booters.
-Add number ranks that can change
-Add playlist EXP.
-Fix spawns on some maps
-Fix the opening spawns on Sword base, Reflection and other maps
-Take away dead Playlist
-CO-OP Theater, i mean really....
-Take notes from MLG

My point is that if 343 can't take the time to fix these easy problems how can we expect them to even care when making halo 4?

Voice your opinion.


They dont care about Reach much, because its not their game, and they are focusing almost all attention on Halo4.

  • 02.15.2012 5:57 AM PDT


Posted by: Cavik Akavelle
Oh, hey, look, another person who thinks Halo 4 will fail because 343 isn't trying to completely fix an unfixable game of which they didn't even make, when it's already their job to make three more Halos.

[Slams fist down on the "Destroy All Humanity" button.]


Not even that they make stupid decisions. TU beta, DLC and the banshee on breakneck is a great example. I could continue on and on. They try to fix the issue but fail terribly. Look at TS TU ar starts ? Really?

  • 02.15.2012 5:59 AM PDT

Its very hard to judge a game when you have no info and never even seen a screenshot of it!

This is the first Halo game not developed by Bungie and this is 343's first big game, thats a lot of pressure for them. I think we should all approach Halo 4 with an open mind and just see what happens.

  • 02.15.2012 6:05 AM PDT

Halo 4 will disappoint. It being bad is irrelevant, people will not like aspects of Halo 4, they will look back to past games - including Reach - and claim that it has failed to live up to the hype.

Just like any other Halo game. The MLG fans especially will be disappointed and I will laugh at them pretty hard despite me being a MLG fangirl myself.

  • 02.15.2012 6:06 AM PDT


Posted by: Dattebayo
Halo 4 will disappoint. It being bad is irrelevant, people will not like aspects of Halo 4, they will look back to past games - including Reach - and claim that it has failed to live up to the hype.

Just like any other Halo game. The MLG fans especially will be disappointed and I will laugh at them pretty hard despite me being a MLG fangirl myself.


Nothing can be worse than Reach.

  • 02.15.2012 6:16 AM PDT

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
Goat was famous. Irie was infamous. Gh0st was FaMaS.

My stats in Halol 4

Typical Waypoint post.
no it's "its got to go" you wouldn't say the "it is got to go" would you?


Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Dattebayo
Halo 4 will disappoint. It being bad is irrelevant, people will not like aspects of Halo 4, they will look back to past games - including Reach - and claim that it has failed to live up to the hype.

Just like any other Halo game. The MLG fans especially will be disappointed and I will laugh at them pretty hard despite me being a MLG fangirl myself.


Nothing can be worse than Reach.
Halo Reach 2.

  • 02.15.2012 6:43 AM PDT

I like to play Reach for fun. I hate MLG, campers, armor lock, and team killers because they ruin that fun. Deal with it.


Posted by: Gh0st is Bad

Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Dattebayo
Halo 4 will disappoint. It being bad is irrelevant, people will not like aspects of Halo 4, they will look back to past games - including Reach - and claim that it has failed to live up to the hype.

Just like any other Halo game. The MLG fans especially will be disappointed and I will laugh at them pretty hard despite me being a MLG fangirl myself.


Nothing can be worse than Reach.
Halo Reach 2.

Then Halo Reach 3, Halo Reach ODST, and Halo Reach Anniversary lol.

  • 02.15.2012 6:59 AM PDT

I'm saving my judgement until I actually play the game.

  • 02.15.2012 7:05 AM PDT

Call me Stu

Nope and having alts isn't funny at all.

  • 02.15.2012 7:10 AM PDT

Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Cavik Akavelle
Oh, hey, look, another person who thinks Halo 4 will fail because 343 isn't trying to completely fix an unfixable game of which they didn't even make, when it's already their job to make three more Halos.

[Slams fist down on the "Destroy All Humanity" button.]


Not even that they make stupid decisions. TU beta, DLC and the banshee on breakneck is a great example. I could continue on and on. They try to fix the issue but fail terribly. Look at TS TU ar starts ? Really?
If not for 343, I think a major part of the population of Reach would be gone. I probably would be. What we have now is far more fun than default Reach, and because of that: I don't think they failed. They may have made a few mistakes in trying to make Reach better, but trying to build a new game from the bottom up is not the same as trying to fix a game of which they, as a company, didn't even make; so I fail to see how their "failure at fixing Reach" is evidence enough to say "Halo 4 will be a failure".

And another thing: Bungie made Halo CE and Halo 2, and those were great games. They made a bunch of really stupid decisions with Reach, but that doesn't mean they aren't capable of making great games. So how can 343's "stupid decisions" when it comes to fixing a game they didn't even make have any bearing whatsoever on whether or not Halo 4 will be a great game or not?

And where did all the common sense go?

  • 02.15.2012 6:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Only if it has Gundams.

  • 02.15.2012 6:47 PM PDT

Needs more Land Turtles.

  • 02.15.2012 6:51 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member
  • gamertag: OU812
  • user homepage:

Let just say your on the wrong site, you will need to go to halo.xbox.com to discuss H4. Just a thought maybe what you're saying needs fixed doesn't, and if you had a little sense 343 has bungie employes and I believe they have more talent in their old socks than you do in your own mind...just saying is all.

  • 02.15.2012 6:56 PM PDT


Posted by: Throttle
I myself think the game won't be much better then Reach if it's even better then Reach at all for one main reason

Bungie did not care, therefor Halo reach was not as good as it could have been.

343 cares...A little bit.... They toggle around the playlist each month but besides that they don't really do anything to change the game to help it such as:

-Take away Jetpack
-Take away Armor lock
-Take away Camo, or atleast fix the motion Jammer
-Ban Host booters.
-Add number ranks that can change
-Add playlist EXP.
-Fix spawns on some maps
-Fix the opening spawns on Sword base, Reflection and other maps
-Take away dead Playlist
-CO-OP Theater, i mean really....
-Take notes from MLG

My point is that if 343 can't take the time to fix these easy problems how can we expect them to even care when making halo 4?

Voice your opinion.

Might as well play Halo 3. It has all of those things removed, and Bungie actually cared back then.

  • 02.15.2012 7:58 PM PDT

Reach is total garbage. I'm proud it failed and died. Hope this message gets to 343 and they make a proper game.

Quit competitive Halo, I have acquired something called "having a life". Play it time to time as of now. Some people should also try this thing called "having a life".

Give us a Halo 3.5 with new maps, campaign, theater, forge world, new weapons, etc. and I'll pay $60 for Halo 4. :)

  • 02.15.2012 8:05 PM PDT

Reach is total garbage. I'm proud it failed and died. Hope this message gets to 343 and they make a proper game.

Quit competitive Halo, I have acquired something called "having a life". Play it time to time as of now. Some people should also try this thing called "having a life".


Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Dattebayo
Halo 4 will disappoint. It being bad is irrelevant, people will not like aspects of Halo 4, they will look back to past games - including Reach - and claim that it has failed to live up to the hype.

Just like any other Halo game. The MLG fans especially will be disappointed and I will laugh at them pretty hard despite me being a MLG fangirl myself.


Nothing can be worse than Reach.


Agreed.

  • 02.15.2012 8:08 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2