- B Rye
- |
- Veteran Legendary Member
The 343 forums suck. They're full of retarded kids and mods who got butthurt in the B.net forums for being told that they're bad.
Posted by: Capitol Noodle
Posted by: ToxicAcidsnake
TU solves so many problems it's retarded there is even a debate about it.
Re: Bleedthrough:
Is it fair for me to get 3 shots on a guy sprinting at me and he's still able to double beatdown me? Resulting in both our deaths.
Is it wrong to reward me for getting consecutive headshots on a sheilded opponent?
Re: TU Bloom:
Is it wrong to want a weapon that reliably shoots straight? Is it wrong to get frustrated at people getting lucky spamming their DMR while I try and pace to ensure my shots are pure?
Re: AL: Is it fair for other players to be able to just pause their battle for a whole 6 seconds when you've been outplayed and dug your own grave?
Should I be able to get stuck by a solid sticky to the face, and just press a button to negate it, possibly even killing the person who threw it?
...
If you answer "Yes" to any of these questions, then you are part of the problem.
I agree with you, except for the bleedthrough part. The bleedthrough should only be applied to melee. It is ridiculous to still have some shields and still be vulnerable to a headshot. What's the point in your shields popping then? Maybe it's just because I played Halo 3 a lot, but when I have ANY amount of shields, headshots should NOT count.
That is incredibly wrong. In Halo 3 you could have a tiny bit of shields and be shot with one three round burst to the head and die. So even if you had shields, the burst still could kill you.
With Reach, however, it is not a burst weapon. It is a single-shot, so it works differently. I do not like the bleedthrough headshots with a single bullet because it doesn't make sense. I feel that bleedthrough should not be in the TU because its main goal was to change the melee system, which I feel could have been changed with just reducing the strength of the melee.