Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: 343 the best thing to ever happen to halo
  • Subject: 343 the best thing to ever happen to halo
  • This post has been reported for violating the code of conduct. Click arrow to view at your own risk.

The Few, The True, The crew

remember ChiFighter= k+eye+fighter

Microsoft has ALWAYS owned Halo ever since Bungie first started to work for them.

Halo 3 is like my favorite game of all time BUT it had a silly broken ranking system. Halo 2's was a real system. Your rank in Halo 3 had no correlation to your skill.

Reach is good, just one to many. We were bored by that time, :(

  • 02.21.2012 5:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Go over to the Reach forum amigo. Leave us in peace.

  • 02.21.2012 5:36 PM PDT


Posted by: Sandtrap
Go over to the Reach forum amigo. Leave us in peace.


This. Also, just fyi, there is a ranking system in Reach. You just can't see it. It has the exact same trueskill ranking system that 3 does, it was just updated and made invisible to players. But your rank still determines who you're match up against. Maybe you should do some research before bashing the company that gave you halo in the first place. You say you didn't want Reach, well neither did bungie. They were legally obligated to make it due to their contract with Microsoft, so you can just float and sputter.

  • 02.21.2012 7:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Poy357
  • user homepage:

Posted by: EBuRnSs
Bungie do you want to know why reach sucks ass? because no one wants to play a horrible game when there's no ranks in this game. When i play Halo 3 i wanted to get on to rank up that's the only thing that keep anyone playing but reach i want to burn your -blam!- game. Its not even a "Halo" game its a failer and I'm happy you gave rights to 343 because you failed hard


Want to know something? You've already bought the game.

  • 02.21.2012 7:34 PM PDT

Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien.
Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar.
tenn' Ambar-metta!


Posted by: EBuRnSs
Bungie do you want to know why reach sucks ass? because no one wants to play a horrible game when there's no ranks in this game. When i play Halo 3 i wanted to get on to rank up that's the only thing that keep anyone playing but reach i want to burn your -blam!- game. Its not even a "Halo" game its a failer and I'm happy you gave rights to 343 because you failed hard


Yeah, Halo 4 really looks pretty bad, Bungie made Halo what it is. Go and complain in waypoint.

  • 02.21.2012 8:45 PM PDT

hahahahahahahaha

  • 02.21.2012 9:40 PM PDT

There are three people I serve. God, Chuck norris, and Evilcam.


Posted by: lupe1the1fiasco
hahahahahahahaha
I did the same thing when I saw the title. OP it can't be the best thing to happen to Halo because without Bungie there wouldn't have been a Halo at all my good sir.

  • 02.22.2012 1:45 AM PDT

No, Bungie was the best thing to happen to Halo because it wouldn't exist without Bungie.

And what you (OP) consider to be a "crap ranking system" is a really, really flawed excuse of an argument. Nobody won't buy Reach because of its ranking system.
Not liking story, gameplay etc are more valid arguments.
And even then: Reach is by no objective means a "bad" game.

  • 02.22.2012 1:58 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

:)

Posted by: DonVinzone1
No, Bungie was the best thing to happen to Halo because it wouldn't exist without Bungie.

And what you (OP) consider to be a "crap ranking system" is a really, really flawed excuse of an argument. Nobody won't buy Reach because of its ranking system.
Not liking story, gameplay etc are more valid arguments.
And even then: Reach is by no objective means a "bad" game.

Exactly. What Bungie came up with in Reach was brilliant, it's just that it needed some tweaking (story aside, which was mediocre at best)... Which I believe the TU that 343i released did nicely.

Regardless, the original trilogy was amazing and it's sad to see people bash the developer because of one game that was slightly 'different'.

  • 02.22.2012 2:21 AM PDT


Posted by: jross1993
Posted by: DonVinzone1
No, Bungie was the best thing to happen to Halo because it wouldn't exist without Bungie.

And what you (OP) consider to be a "crap ranking system" is a really, really flawed excuse of an argument. Nobody won't buy Reach because of its ranking system.
Not liking story, gameplay etc are more valid arguments.
And even then: Reach is by no objective means a "bad" game.

Exactly. What Bungie came up with in Reach was brilliant, it's just that it needed some tweaking (story aside, which was mediocre at best)... Which I believe the TU that 343i released did nicely.

Regardless, the original trilogy was amazing and it's sad to see people bash the developer because of one game that was slightly 'different'.


I agree.

Also: I do think 343i is the best thing to happen to Halo at this moment, just not ever.
I mean: as good as Reach was, you could notice the lack of genuine heart and soul being put in the game by Bungie. For both Bungie and Halo it was best to part ways. Now Bungie can do their thing which they're excited about, and Halo can benefit from a new developer who can breathe some fresh air into the series. Both parties win.
But that has "nothing" to do with Reach being a "dissapointment" (if I were that shortsighted, I would have been screaming for a new developer the day I finished H3...)

  • 02.22.2012 4:07 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

As long as you're predicting the future how about you give up the Lottery numbers for tomorrow.

OT Not all Halo fans dislike Reach, some of us think it's better than 95% of other games currently on sale..

  • 02.22.2012 5:35 AM PDT