Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: to the person who came up with the quit ban
  • Subject: to the person who came up with the quit ban
Subject: to the person who came up with the quit ban
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Oh and as for CoD's problem of constantly re-joining a room you just quit from..

That's when you do quick match in a different playlist... DUH!

I' mean really? You figured out that the system needs a few minutes to let someone else fill that spot, yet you continue to immediately re-search, knowing it's going to put you right back in the spot you left open...and your going to complain about your inability to see that?

  • 02.24.2012 5:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: A Wise One

Posted by: HD PVR

Posted by: xSmoothmouse
This Mr. EOS guy seems mad.


After reading some other things he's posted, I've come to the conclusion that he just isn't very intelligent.


Offering far superior alternatives is what people with functioning brains do, how is it not intelligent?

Yes, but calling people stupid and throwing out various other grade school insults while doing so doesn't make you look very credible.


Posted by: MR E0S
Oh and as for CoD's problem of constantly re-joining a room you just quit from..

That's when you do quick match in a different playlist... DUH!

I' mean really? You figured out that the system needs a few minutes to let someone else fill that spot, yet you continue to immediately re-search, knowing it's going to put you right back in the spot you left open...and your going to complain about your inability to see that?

You completely missed my point. The problem is not that I keep rejoining the same room, it's that I don't have control over whether or not I play a full match from start to finish - unless I want to play against the same people over and over.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:44 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:42 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Yeah, and what would you have to say to your dad when he's spanking you for being a dumbass?

"Daddy, you don't look very credible when you're angry"



[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:46 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

What is so important about playing a match from start to finish?

No really. What's the big deal?

Join a game, start shooting people, help with the objective.... What else is there to give a -blam!- about?

"But I have to be able to talk smack before and after in the lobby...duhr"

Hah..someone beat me to it!

[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:48 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: MR E0S
Yeah, and what would you have to say to your dad when he's spanking you for being a dumbass?

"Daddy, you don't look very credible when you're angry"


Now do you see why I said he isn't very intelligent?

Why do I want to play the game from start to finish? Well, in Halo (aside from Reach, obviously), you rank up by winning. Why would I want to join a game in process where I'm already losing? The same goes for winning. I don't want to join the match when there is one or two kills left and get a win. That's not fair to anyone.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:51 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

No, I don't see it seeing as how you've said pretty much nothing the entire time you've been in this thread.

For someone who can only type out a single line response... in a conversation they have nothing to contribute.
You really have no business trying to question someone elses intelligence.

  • 02.24.2012 5:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: A Wise One

Posted by: HD PVR
Posted by: MR E0S
Yeah, and what would you have to say to your dad when he's spanking you for being a dumbass?

"Daddy, you don't look very credible when you're angry"


Now do you see why I said he isn't very intelligent?

Why do I want to play the game from start to finish? Well, in Halo (aside from Reach, obviously), you rank up by winning. Why would I want to join a game in process where I'm already losing? The same goes for winning. I don't want to join the match when there is one or two kills left and get a win. That's not fair to anyone.


That's Bungie's fault, scores should be and are becoming more individual. Win/loss should be completely irrelevant.

Why should they be individual in a team game? That didn't work out so well for Arena, which is why they changed it back to team.

  • 02.24.2012 5:53 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Ok, so because your win/loss, rank bs. We all have to go without.

Even though, win/loss really means jack -blam!- in the greater context of things, if the players themselves were allowed to decide for themselves whether they belong in a match with someone.

Maybe if we could get away from catering to kids with ADD that can only handle at most 10-15 minute matches of BS...you'd actually have more time to get comfortable with a match.

You know, before Halo came along and -blam!- everything up, the average time I used to spend in an FPS match with dedicated servers/browser was about 30 minutes if not up to an hour.

1 match lasting an hour.
When's the last time you did that in Halo?

[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:55 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MR E0S
Ok, so because your win/loss, rank bs. We all have to go without.

If your rank is based on win/loss (Halo 2/Halo 3, Arena, possibly Halo 4), you can't have a drop in-drop out system. It just doesn't fit.

  • 02.24.2012 5:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Then there is this.

IF Halo had a join-in-progress sytem...

Here's how you keep the stat whores happy.

You have to spend a minimum of 2 minutes in that match to get any stats recorded.

This solves the issue of joining a losing game in progress with anything less than 2 minutes left to go.

This also solves the issue of joining into a game and immediately being convinced by all signs that you should immediately back out and search again.

Done.

Now quit your -blam!-in.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 5:59 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Or, they could have that for social playlists and leave the competitive/ranked playlists the way they've always been. I would not be opposed to that.

  • 02.24.2012 5:58 PM PDT

Que Custodiet Ipsos Custodes

--Tea-baggers are funny, it's as if they think they are far more hetero than the people who do it in real life, because they use their e-ballsacks to do it. What a manly victory dance.
~ManBearPig_06~


Posted by: MR E0S
What is so important about playing a match from start to finish?


Posted by: A Wise One
Why would you care about being in a game from start to finish?

You can't be serious. There's no point in teams existing in the first place if you think like that.

If you want to just kill randomly with no point, play against AI or in free for all. If you want to play a team game, play as a team.

Posted by: A Wise One
Time for bong hits and Judge Judy!

Well, I think that explained why you can't understand simple concepts.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 6:01 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 5:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I think I will decide that, thank you.

-blam!- you and your.. "Lone wolves should be limited to FFA only" bs

-blam!- YOU!

Even as a random player who could care less about joining a game in progress, I'm probably more team-oriented than you would ever be.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 6:01 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 6:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MR E0S
I think I will decide that, thank you.

-blam!- you and your.. "Lone wolves should be limited to FFA only" bs

-blam!- YOU!

I'm trying to take you seriously, but it's so hard when you post stuff like this.

  • 02.24.2012 6:01 PM PDT

Que Custodiet Ipsos Custodes

--Tea-baggers are funny, it's as if they think they are far more hetero than the people who do it in real life, because they use their e-ballsacks to do it. What a manly victory dance.
~ManBearPig_06~

Posted by: MR E0S
-blam!- you and your.. "Lone wolves should be limited to FFA only" bs

That's...the definition of a lone wolf. Playing by themselves with no support whatsoever. If you play like that in a team game, you're either still helping your team, or being a detriment to them, depending on skill, but it's still affecting your team.

If you only care about killing people and not about playing as a team, the only reason you would go in a team game is because there are less people shooting you back, and at the same time distracting people from shooting you. I'd call that cowardice.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 6:06 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 6:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I'm just here to entertain, and troll you people with the truth.

Are you not entertained?

  • 02.24.2012 6:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I feel like I've just been trolled by E0S. If so, 10/10.

  • 02.24.2012 6:04 PM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Yeah..but
<-----This Lone Wolf, likes trying to create order out of chaos.

Or rather, I find the game more enjoyable when I have never played with my team before. It makes the game more exciting than..

Playing with the same people everyday just to -blam!- a bunch of random noobs.
I've been there, done that. It's boring.
I already know what they are capable of, and how they play, and they no longer interest me like the random teammates do.

Playing with the same people everyday doesn't encourage you to be adaptable. Because you just settle into a rhythm where everyone has their job and you just do it.

With random teammates. You have to adapt to them and how they play....(if possible)
=MORE EXCITING GAMEPLAY

At least that's why I choose to go into a team-playlist by myself. Don't know about anyone else.

And the reason why I avoid FFA like the plague...Well it's just stupid to spawn in to the conditions that FFA creates. It's a stupid form a gameplay to have that much chaos. I like chaos, but not that much. FFA is the most senseless gametype up for offer as far as I'm concerned. And it mostly comes down to spawning and luck.

Hell the first tournament they ever held for Halo was a FFA contest. The guy who ended up winning. Won solely because he was lucky enough to spawn on the outskirts while everyone else kept spawning in the middle battling each other while he just ganked kills from the sidelines. And it's not like they're going to ignore each other in the middle just to gang up on him (though they should have) Easiest 60" plasma that guy ever earned.

[Edited on 02.24.2012 6:16 PM PST]

  • 02.24.2012 6:08 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm done.

  • 02.24.2012 6:12 PM PDT

People stop playing the game all together if the game sucks, they don't continue playing but quit more. Seriously flawed logic.

They also quit more if they suck, which it sounds like you do. Get better and stop blaming the system.

  • 02.24.2012 8:18 PM PDT