Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: 343 Ruined Halo Reach.
  • Subject: 343 Ruined Halo Reach.
Subject: 343 Ruined Halo Reach.
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Heroic Member

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
global warming isn't proven and won't be - it's more of a political play for funding for "research"


Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: Clone

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: Darkness TB
Notes- Only Halo 2/3 were fast-paced, Halo: CE, ODST and Reach were most definitely slow paced, they were almost more methodical than quick headshots(COD?).

What's funny is that CE was pretty fast paced, considering that the utility weapon was a 3sk kill (even though it was difficult to properly execute 3sk's every single time, and they ended up as 4sk's) and all the weapons were considerably stronger than they are now.

I can three shot in Halo PC

Your post is invalid.

lolwhat?

You said you can only four shot

I can three shot in Halo PC even with the lag.

  • 05.15.2012 7:40 PM PDT


Posted by: Clone

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: Clone

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: Darkness TB
Notes- Only Halo 2/3 were fast-paced, Halo: CE, ODST and Reach were most definitely slow paced, they were almost more methodical than quick headshots(COD?).

What's funny is that CE was pretty fast paced, considering that the utility weapon was a 3sk kill (even though it was difficult to properly execute 3sk's every single time, and they ended up as 4sk's) and all the weapons were considerably stronger than they are now.

I can three shot in Halo PC

Your post is invalid.

lolwhat?

You said you can only four shot

I can three shot in Halo PC even with the lag.

I said it was difficult to consistently pull off 3sk's every time, thus making 4sk's more frequent.

  • 05.15.2012 8:33 PM PDT

Pretty sure Bungie ruined Reach with the help from 343...

  • 05.15.2012 8:45 PM PDT

A competitive players main goal is to win.
A casuals main goal is to have fun regardless of whether that results in a win or loss.
It has nothing to do with individual skill or knowledge, it has to do with the reason you play.

It was ruined from the first day of beta.

  • 05.16.2012 12:12 AM PDT

Posted by: Darkness TB
You're an idiot.

  • 05.16.2012 1:03 AM PDT

Revielle- A small community with the goals of making a difference for our members. We hope to bring together people of far distances, and many differences, into our community for long lasting friendships and new gaming experiences.

So stop reading and join already or Get Simmonsized!

The only notable change I've really felt was bloom and the Pistol. Man the pistol, so OP its ridiculous.

  • 05.16.2012 2:17 AM PDT

U Wot m8

Ahhahahahahahahahaha

  • 05.16.2012 2:20 AM PDT

Mediocre Backpacker
56% W\L
2.86 k\d
3.18 DMR
7.29 God Magnum
7.79 Sniper
5.34 Needle Rifle

Posted by: boomdeyadah
Posted by: Darkness TB
You're an idiot.
He's an alt too.

  • 05.16.2012 2:34 AM PDT

Posted by: Blackdog Rker
Posted by: boomdeyadah
Posted by: Darkness TB
You're an idiot.
He's an alt too.
Figures..

  • 05.16.2012 2:40 AM PDT


Posted by: boomdeyadah
Posted by: Blackdog Rker
Posted by: boomdeyadah
Posted by: Darkness TB
You're an idiot.
He's an alt too.
Figures..

It's Mr. EOS. Can't you tell?

  • 05.16.2012 4:27 AM PDT

Double post

[Edited on 05.16.2012 5:34 AM PDT]

  • 05.16.2012 5:34 AM PDT


Posted by: Darkness TB
They changed Reach late in it's career.

Everyone knows Halo 2/3 retards love BRs and small maps to spam grenades.

Everyone also knows Halo: Reach is a failure of a game.

I insulted both groups, see? No need to add more flames as I flamed everyone(And me, I love Reach) enough already.

The one thing that any and every Halo fan can agree on is that Halo needs to split it's fanbase.

Halo 4 is not a game for Halo fans, 343i clearly stated(to MY ears) that Halo 4 is a game exclusive to the crowd that got TU onto Reach.

TU wasn't backported to Halo 3 to include bloom, fall damage or remove dual wielding.

They made it very clear they favor one group over the other, all respectable Halo gamers will know what must be done.

Just like Sonic's fanbase, Mario's fanbase and Call of Duty's fanbase.

Halo as at that point where it can no longer focus on one gamer.

Battlefield, Call of Duty, Medal of Honor, etc.

Are all competitors, and they only gotten stronger, I love Halo more than anyother FPS but to be honest, if Halo 2/3 got a re-release instead of Reach coming out, Battlefield and Call of Duty would have wiped the floor with it and gave it back to Microsoft.

The "competitive" Battle Rifle players aren't enough to carry a franchise. Say what you want about Halo: Reach or it's fans, but they're right, you Halo 2/3 ruined Halo: Reach.

Read close you ruined Halo: Reach, even if they made Reach "better" for everyone it was still changed and not the true Halo: Reach game, it was changed to your likings.

I don't know why 343i is even catering to fanbase who are so proud of posting.

"I sold reach in two weeks! LOLOL!"

It's ridiculous.

Halo: Reach isn't Halo 2/3 but you guys made it that way, congrats of compromising the game.

Whenever Halo 4 comes out, people will strangely realize half the community is missing. But that's a good thing right? All we need in Halo is the Battle Rifle and sniper.


Thats why the population is so great on Reach right? Halo 3 population usually hovered around 250k and at least 500k on the weekends. If Reach is lucky they hit 100k on the weekends, the numbers speak for themselves. Why play a COD look alike when you can just play COD?

  • 05.16.2012 5:35 AM PDT

Sword Base is a shell of it's former self, and ALL of the maps they've edited, to be frank, are the -blam!-iest things I've ever played on.

You mean "Spooky Base"? Tell me about. That map is garbage.

  • 05.16.2012 9:22 AM PDT

Founder of Team Reclaimer where we specialize in Big Team Battle and Invasion games. We are all about Communication, Dedication and Fun.


Posted by: Darkness TB
Halo 2/3 fanboys.... Is this really all you can come up with?

Someone gives you facts, and legitmate arguments and you run behind the same damn wall every single time?

Who said ANYTHING about population? Do you know how many factors plays in a game's population?

Was Call of Duty the juggernaut it is now in 2007? NO.

Was Zombies mode available whenever Halo 3 came out? No.

Was there Red Dead Redemption, Little Big Planet, Uncharted, Batman Arkham City available? Did Street Fighter 4 exist?

Was Xbox Live cheaper? Did Xboxs break within that time frame? Did people who play Halo 3 age in three years and went off to college preventing them from jumping immediately into Reach?

Was it launched as early in the 360's career as Halo 3? Were people converted to Battlefield 3 the next year?

You Halo 2/3 sorely irritate me(Which you enjoy judging by your responses), Halo 3 isn't Halo's "heyday" it launched at the right time, at the right place(Everywhere?).

Basically what you halo 3 fans are saying is in a alternate universe where Reach came first and Halo 3 was the game that came out in 2010, you think the population would still be 250,000?(This number is a lie, I played Halo 3 since launch and it never averaged this)

In the face of better games like Uncharted 2, Arkham Asylum, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Street Fighter 4, Grand theft Auto 4, Red Dead Redemption, Call of Duty and many more? You're out of your mind, you guys don't understand anything that's not a Battle Rifle.

We got WAY off-topic, I just had to shut up this population argument once and for all.

Nobody challenged my argument legitmately, they just went around the world on a wild goose chase because. "Hao wreak sux! i got2 ues a pis0l @nd Uhsualt wrifkle? hao wreak sux!#@!"

And this is how it all started off.

I gotta little proposition to make, only the strong will answer.

I believe you guys already have an account with Halo Waypoint right?

I want you Halo 2/3 fans to link your gamer tag to there and make your stats available, and after a month had passed after Halo 4, we'll take a look at your tools of destruction.

It's Battle Rifle 50%(or more) and everything else fits into the other 50%, I think I would have proved my point.

I just proved(Yes, it's proven), that population had more do with the games and industry at that time, and it had almost nothing do with that Halo: Reach was missing the Battle Rifle.

Since 343i is stroking you guys hard, I know you could careless about the other side of the Halo community but anyone with a lick of sense knows that Halo 4 is for Halo 2/3 elitists throughout, to the fact that s much emphasis was put on the Battle Rifle returning.

"The Battle Rifle is back! Halo 3 kids rejoice!."


Mr EOS plz go away.

  • 05.16.2012 11:58 AM PDT


Posted by: TenguNova
Mr EOS plz go away.

  • 05.16.2012 2:18 PM PDT

Mediocre Backpacker
56% W\L
2.86 k\d
3.18 DMR
7.29 God Magnum
7.79 Sniper
5.34 Needle Rifle


Posted by: Darkness TB

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: TenguNova
Mr EOS plz go away.


Is this why Call of Duty has better(And bigger) community than Halo? ._.
If you thought you were going to be taken seriously with the idiotic dribble that drooled out of your mouth up there then LAWL. You're such an obvious troll.

  • 05.16.2012 2:33 PM PDT

Planking : Parkour for people who don't move very fast.


Posted by: Darkness TB
Since 343i is stroking you guys hard, I know you could careless about the other side of the Halo community but anyone with a lick of sense knows that Halo 4 is for Halo 2/3 elitists throughout, to the fact that s much emphasis was put on the Battle Rifle returning.

"The Battle Rifle is back! Halo 3 kids rejoice!."


From what I have seen of the information released, getting the BR back is the ONLY thing 'Halo 2/3 kids' have going for them. From what I understand, it's a BR in name only, since those who have tested Halo 4 says it handles much differently now.


[Edited on 05.16.2012 2:35 PM PDT]

  • 05.16.2012 2:34 PM PDT

Mediocre Backpacker
56% W\L
2.86 k\d
3.18 DMR
7.29 God Magnum
7.79 Sniper
5.34 Needle Rifle


Posted by: Darkness TB

Posted by: Blackdog Rker

Posted by: Darkness TB

Posted by: ThreeSixXero

Posted by: TenguNova
Mr EOS plz go away.


Is this why Call of Duty has better(And bigger) community than Halo? ._.
If you thought you were going to be taken seriously with the idiotic dribble that drooled out of your mouth up there then LAWL. You're such an obvious troll.


You only replied whenever Call of Duty was mentioned,

You used the word "Troll" without knowing it's definition.

You LAWL, and overall you made a comment you copied from other elitists from many many years ago.

Anyone who doesn't slurp your sack is a troll right?

There's a word for you....and it's called.....let me see....

Stupid.

EDIT: Oh yeah, I don't wanna see you post again, your comments have already been refuted and you're nothing but a Halo 3 elitist so begone please.
Touched a nerve, did I? Go read some of the H4 threads in this forum and the Flood, then come say the competitive's are getting their Halo 3.5 in H4. They'll get the Br and quick movement and thats it. Your other points have been dealt with and answered before so I'm not beating that dead horse.

  • 05.16.2012 2:55 PM PDT

Want a cool clan? Join FRAG!

Want a war sim? The best war sim in Halo, Forerunner Conflict.


Posted by: Darkness TBYou have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

1. While the BR may have dominated everything in H2 (I didn't play enough H2 MP to know), it certainly did not in H3. Power weapons, the AR, the plasma rifle, the carbine, dual wielding, all of these options were useful in their niches. What kept gameplay interesting in H3 was the fact that, while the BR was effective in most of these niches, it didn't dominate the other weapons IF THEY WERE BEING USED PROPERLY. ie, a good player using an AR would beat an equally skilled player that is using a BR in CQC, but a bad player with an AR will not beat a good player with a BR in CQC based solely on the fact that he has the better weapon.

2. 343i is not full of competitive players. Based on the gameplay of H4 (which is undoubtedly from 343i employees), they most likely all suck. Of course, I have no proof in this matter, but surely you'd get footage from your best players, right? Plus, with all the changes they're implementing in H4, why are you complaining? They're obviously catering to casual players like you, and you're mad about that?

3. It's funny, because you called CE slow paced. It was, in fact, the fastest paced game. You just weren't good enough to ever play at the speeds that were possible in that game.

And why did you make an alt EOS? It doesn't make a difference when you keep the same distinct typing style we all recognize.

  • 05.16.2012 2:59 PM PDT


Posted by: ClearOrangeZero

Posted by: Darkness TBYou have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

What's funny is that this is always what we arrive at with him, yet he keeps asserting his broken claims over long periods of time, and then proceeds to say that we haven't argued against them when, in reality, we've debunked them so much in the past that we don't care to retort anymore.

  • 05.16.2012 3:02 PM PDT