Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Should there be a Flamethrower in Halo 3???
  • Subject: Should there be a Flamethrower in Halo 3???
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Should there be a Flamethrower in Halo 3???

Aerospace engineers build planes, civil engineers build targets
Another died from a lead overdose

no because it would be awsome to watch a group of grunts burn to the ground but........ okay that would be way too cool, PUT IT IN!

  • 05.23.2006 5:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Your not serious, are you?

  • 05.23.2006 5:33 PM PDT

"You have been measured, you have been weighed: And you have been found lacking."

They had the Flamethrower in Halo 2...

Least they inserted it and got it working... Don't remember why they took it out... Couldn't get it to work perfectly

  • 05.23.2006 5:35 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

if you really want to see that, why dont you go make your own company, build a game from scratch, and do that...not only will you fail, you would be sued and will go poor and no one will ever hear of you again.....ok, thats whay too cool go and do it...jk, but be realistic

  • 05.23.2006 5:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: DeadKenny504
a flame thrower is to crude for 2552

It's been said before, but this is a good reason to make it a plasma-based covenant weapon; specifically a Brute weapon. Also, it makes more sense to have superheated plasma ripping through MJOLNIR Mk VI armor than napalm, I mean it's a full-body suit for christ's sakes!

  • 05.23.2006 5:37 PM PDT

--7-- I've been a Bungie member since 2004. --7--

No flamethrower! and I garuntee bungie won't include it because it screws with gameplay.
PLUS!!! it's the future...2550 (somethin) and the US. army stopped using the flame thrower in Vietnam or something.

Ahh little kiddies talking about the flame thrower again.

  • 05.23.2006 5:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: KMS Ahrnaieanin
They had the Flamethrower in Halo 2...

Least they inserted it and got it working... Don't remember why they took it out... Couldn't get it to work perfectly

If I recall, it's because they wanted it to be able to actually burn things (destructable environments) but the idea along with the weapon was scraped because of the limitations of the Xbox.

  • 05.23.2006 5:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: TROJANman077
No flamethrower! and I garuntee bungie won't include it because it screws with gameplay.
PLUS!!! it's the future...2550 (somethin) and the US. army stopped using the flame thrower in Vietnam or something.

Ahh little kiddies talking about the flame thrower again.

Yeah, but Brutes still use bayonetts and Elites still have swords so it would make sense as a covenant weapon.

  • 05.23.2006 5:42 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

it would definately change my tune if they added it as a brutes weapon, but the brutes have TWO of their own weapons already, i dont see any other race specific weapon other than the sword for the elites...and i know someone will say"what about the carbine..." well that is shared between the brutes and elites like the needler is shared with grunts and elites and the plasma pistol for grunts and jackals. the plasma rifle is the generic weapon of all of the covenant, and the jackals have their own which is the beam rifle...why should the brutes get 3 race specific weapons before the grunts got their first?

  • 05.23.2006 5:43 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2