- Normalism
- |
- Honorable Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: jammypj wuz here
Posted by: Kira Onime
Posted by: jammypj wuz here
Posted by: pizzaguy199
An Inheritor on Reach could be a rank 12 on Halo 3.. Reach requires no skill.
Halo 3 takes no skill either. sure skill makes it easier to level up, but since its based off of winning and not kills, then that means you can get no kills an entire game, have your team do all the work, and earn exp. it is possible to get to max rank without killing a single person.
H3.
You win = 1exp
You lose = nada.
Winning + exp increased your global rank
Reach
Win/lose = EVERYBODY WINS!
Win/lose your rank still goes up.
Oh btw did you know.
You can get max rank in reach without getting a kill as well!
How -blam!- brilliant.
Also, you're -blam!- retarded.
oh but did you know it is a lot harder to get to max rank with no kills in Reach than it is in Halo 3? you sir, are the retard. reachs ranks are ment to keep players who do awesome but lose games, because, guess what, you earn a -blam!- load more cR for doing good!!! in halo 3 it didnt matter if you had 49 and no one on your team had any kills but the enemy team all had 12 or 13 kills, you wont earn exp. Halo 3's ranking sysem sucked ass, because now poor players can feel good about their rank, plus, seasoned players are much more important than skilled players.
skilled players are all cocky and -blam!-s, when seasoned players are typically nice. so, -blam!- you, sir.
It's harder to get max rank in Reach with no kills? I didn't know AFKing was difficult. What about custom challenges? Look at my stats and play time for crying out loud. (2nd account)