- ABILLIONDOLLERS
- |
- Honorable Member
Halo reach is a violent shooting game, it involves killing but no where near games like GTA
I have to write an argumentative paper for my college english class about how video games don't aid violent urges/ intensions/ behaviors.
I want to use Reach as one of my examples of a medium between too violent and just regular fun FAKE violence gameplay.
Does any body have some suggestions on how I can use reach and other games to defend video games as entertainment that does not cause violent behavior in its users? Such as; an argument against teen's and their immature actions caused by video games are evidence against the innocence of video games.
or some other argumentative claims that I can make in the defense of video games..because i don't know if you heard about this, but apparently there was an incident in America 2006 where an 18year male named Devin Moore killed 3 cops and blamed it on video games saying he was imitating GTA *face palm*, but its an valid argument claim that i have defend against and is "legendarley" difficult to defend against so I would appreciate any suggestions, evidence, or facts to support my claim
(video games in general, not specifically shooting games)