Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [23 votes]: Which is better-bungie or 343?
  • Poll [23 votes]: Which is better-bungie or 343?
Subject: Which is better-bungie or 343?

Hashtag: first_world_problems
"Not enough polar bears in teh judicial system!"

Poll: Which is better-bungie or 343?  [closed]
Bungie:  83%
(19 Votes)
343 industries:  17%
(4 Votes)
Total Votes: 23

Somehow I already know the results of this one...

  • 04.07.2012 10:03 AM PDT

Digging Foxholes by Profession
Accept No Substitutes

I just want to point out, you're doing this on the BUNGIE forum.

  • 04.07.2012 10:07 AM PDT

Call me Stu


Posted by: DeltaFiveZero
I just want to point out, you're doing this on the BUNGIE forum.

  • 04.07.2012 10:09 AM PDT

Nope, bad.

They both suck.

  • 04.07.2012 10:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Bungie duh.

  • 04.07.2012 10:24 AM PDT

um this is pointless...most people are gonna say BUNGiE. stop comparing things. If you guys hate 343 go on their website and tell them.

  • 04.07.2012 12:27 PM PDT

Hashtag: first_world_problems
"Not enough polar bears in teh judicial system!"


Posted by: DeltaFiveZero
I just want to point out, you're doing this on the BUNGIE forum.

And if this was a 343 forum, people would be saying the same thing, only reversed. Should I post on BOTH forums?

  • 04.07.2012 12:32 PM PDT

wow halo reach is STILL BAD!!!

bunige created halo 1 and halo 2. then they -blam!- up with halo 3 and especially halo reach. 343 tried their best to add custom game options to make reach better. thats the only thing 343 has done so far therefore bungie is currently better.

  • 04.07.2012 12:37 PM PDT

Bungie simply because 343 is making some big mistakes for Halo 4. At least in my opinion.
1) Firefight is being replaced by something called "Spartan Ops(like Spec Ops in the Modern Warfare games).
2) They are making it so that a player can immediately respawn after being killed without having to wait for 3 seconds which I can see will cause MUCH frustration.
3) Players can join a game that is already in progress. It is most likely going to be like CoD where you join the game and there is only one more kill for whatever team/player.

  • 04.07.2012 1:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: BBZak
  • user homepage:

Bungie did great with Halo:CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3.
ODST was neat, but it didn't have enough content to be it's own game IMO.
Reach was an interesting idea, that wasn't done great, sure. It could have been worse.

343 did a great job of fixing a lot of Reach's flaws, there are still some issues around, but as a whole 343 has done great things with reach, I look forward to seeing what they do with Halo 4.

So my vote goes with Bungie, even though Bungie as a company has been around longer, Not really a fair comparison. And most of 343 is comprised of ex-Bungie employees anyway I hear.

  • 04.07.2012 1:44 PM PDT


Posted by: BBZak III
And most of 343 is comprised of ex-Bungie employees anyway I hear.

Nope, just 4 people.

  • 04.07.2012 1:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

RIP Bungie Service Records. You shall be missed.

H4 better not turn out like CoD.

  • 04.07.2012 1:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

After what I saw on the GI. It's safe to say that Bungie > 343i.

Have anyone seen the Elites in Halo 4. They have Locust skin and a cheap looking CoG style armour.

  • 04.07.2012 2:04 PM PDT

Wake me,....When you need me....

Bungie

  • 04.07.2012 2:07 PM PDT

Wake me,....When you need me....


Posted by: EpicDuck1336
H4 better not turn out like CoD.
It already is......

  • 04.07.2012 2:09 PM PDT