Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Who did a better job on Halo Reach?
  • Subject: Who did a better job on Halo Reach?
Subject: Who did a better job on Halo Reach?

Bungie, if Bungie, why?
Or
343 Industries, if 343, why ?

  • 04.11.2012 9:05 PM PDT

The people that made the game and couldn't make any changes since they were handing it over, or the people that were allowed to make changes based on the community and Bungie's statistics they already collected, to a game that was already made.

That's an incredibly silly comparison mate.

  • 04.11.2012 9:08 PM PDT

Oh, I've never acctualy tought of that dude.
Tnx :)

  • 04.11.2012 9:10 PM PDT

~ Videogames are my favorite videogames ~


Posted by: burritosenior
The people that made the game and couldn't make any changes since they were handing it over, or the people that were allowed to make changes based on the community and Bungie's statistics they already collected, to a game that was already made.

That's an incredibly silly comparison mate.


Bungie only had Reach for about half a year didn't they?

Thinking back on it now, I sometimes wonder what changes they would have made compared to 343 if they were allowed to keep full control of this game for a longer time.

Probably would've been less rash on some things.

[Edited on 04.11.2012 9:23 PM PDT]

  • 04.11.2012 9:23 PM PDT

Well, 343i hasn't done much with Reach, so it's hard to tell.

  • 04.11.2012 10:26 PM PDT

Vote for me for a free cookie.

I enjoyed reach a lot more when Bungie was still contolling it, however 343 did make a few nice changes but a lot of bad ones too


[Edited on 04.11.2012 10:29 PM PDT]

  • 04.11.2012 10:29 PM PDT