Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: new theroy plz read
  • Subject: new theroy plz read
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: new theroy plz read
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

In the first halo, guilty spark says that the halo will kill all life (food for the flood) up to a certain amount of lightyears or basicly the whole galaxy with me so far......right.
What im getting at is that the pilar of autum blindly spacejumped and found halo....yeah.
Well if the halo that 117 destroyed was in are galaxy that meens we would'nt die.

this may seem strange but i dont remember what guilty spark sed exactly so forgive me if am wrong (its just a theroy).

  • 06.01.2006 6:16 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I dont think even 117 can go around destroying so many halos. anyway hows he gonna blow it up?

  • 06.01.2006 6:19 AM PDT

Posted by: Eyeshine
News so old, it makes your mom look young[/quote]
Posted By: KittyCat Gansta
...if you didnt read what i said read it again!

Posted by: Jimmy01
Do none of you have a sense of humour?
We do, this just isn't funny.

............... (.....x10000000)


Right..... i am with you, but that isnt a theory.....

We wont die, cause it isnt in our galaxy?

He said something like: He halo can reach up to 3 galaxtic radii from the core or something...


And there are more than one halo, so it doesnt matte rif that one doesnt kill people, the others might....

  • 06.01.2006 6:20 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Location: Outlaws' Summit.

very possible. think of it this way:

you have 7 nukes strewn around planet earth. set them all off at once and the whole planet will blow. disarm one, possibly two, and the odds of survival do increase, even by a little

good theory

  • 06.01.2006 6:20 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

yea, but one is enough to kill us all, so disarming 6 and the last 1 goes off we still die

  • 06.01.2006 6:23 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member
  • gamertag: Naqser
  • user homepage:

Join the Sphere

Read about my gaming here.

there are 7 halos, in our galaxy, strategicly placed so they cover out whole galaxy with their blasts. I hope you know the difference between a galaxy, a solar system and the universe.

Solar Systems consist mostly of a star (sun) and some planets orbiting around it, not so far between them.

A galaxy is made of billion and billions of solar systems, nebulas and at least one black hole and other space stuff

Universe is big, very big, consisting of many galaxies, billions and more billions, between these galaxies there are quadrozbillgigaions of light years.

So disarming one and activate the rest, and stay in the disarmed's blast radius would mean that we would survive

  • 06.01.2006 6:38 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

No there not.
...There, thought that was short and to the point.

[Edited on 6/1/2006]

  • 06.01.2006 7:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Of course if the covies activate the ark, then all the Halo blow up, and chances are one of them would be near us

But then again, if you read the books, you see that earth has VERY advanced space technology. Wouldn't you tink that if there was a Halo in the vicinity of Earth that could harm it, that we would have found it before the autumn made the jump in Halo 1?

  • 06.01.2006 7:50 AM PDT

Quick as a razor, sharp as a bullet.

no

  • 06.01.2006 7:54 AM PDT

"Does Class A absolutely guarantee that they is better quality?

"Innit a coincidence that Jesus was born on Christmas day?"

"Is Disneyland a member of the UN?"

Join Stories and Speculation and get involved with other keen Theorists + Authors!

Ninja Academy

The point is, we don't really know if or if not the Halo MC destroyed was in firing range of Earth. If it wasn't why would chief even bother to destroy it?

  • 06.01.2006 8:03 AM PDT

Quick as a razor, sharp as a bullet.

don't all of the halos fire within three galactic radii?

  • 06.01.2006 8:04 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

They probably all have overlapping fields of fire, to make sure nothing can escape.

  • 06.02.2006 1:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

From The Flood:

Spark bobbed slightly. "Of course," the construct said directly. Then, sounding more like his officious self again, "This installation has a maximum effective radius of twenty-five thousand light years, but once the others follow suit, this galaxy will be quite devoid of life, or at least any life with sufficient biomass to sustain the Flood.

My xbox isn't hooked up at this very moment, so I can't go to check, but 343 Guilty Spark also says that anything with sufficient cognitive ability within 3 radii of the galactic center will be killed by the Halos.

Now, our galaxy has a radius of ~50,000 lightyears. This means that 3 galactic radii would be ~150,000 lightyears from the center of our galaxy. Unless the other 6 Halos have vastly different firing ranges, when more than 1 Halo is activated, they must have some synergistic effect on each other, amplifying the blast to extend much farther than normal. If we assume this, then even if 1 Halo is destroyed, there's a very good chance that the entire galaxy will still feel the effect of the Halos' weapon - this includes Earth.

  • 06.02.2006 2:47 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Good theory -.-

  • 06.02.2006 2:54 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Synergistic is a good word. Without knowing the exact method or coverage of the 7 (well, 6 now) Halos, we have no way of knowing what will happen when they all go off together.

  • 06.02.2006 3:03 AM PDT

I'm blue da ba di da ba dai!

Or they could just go out of the galaxy and make new colonys somewhere els in anothere galaxy.

  • 06.02.2006 3:47 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: its jonny
yea, but one is enough to kill us all, so disarming 6 and the last 1 goes off we still die


in halo ce guilty spark says that when halo is activated it causes a chain reaction with the other halos. in other words onse the explosion from one halo reaches the other it causes that halo to activate. however it would make more sense that the halos are evenly space in a circle. lets say instalation one is acticated the explosion wioo activate instalation 2 then 3 and so on. the explosion from instalation 6 would not activate instalation seven because its not there any more. therfor causing a gap in the chain. in other words, a broken link

  • 06.02.2006 3:57 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

This is very interesting. :-)

  • 06.02.2006 4:00 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I went to dictionary.com and looked up radii. apparently it is plural for radius. that would mean the halos only destroyed life on three lines extending frome the galactic core. once you stop to think about it is actually quite probable. the forunner had the three lines positioned to destroy the planets containing sentiate life at the time. considering the forruner lived a long time ago this would have been long before the evolition of man the three lines wouldn't touch earth, explaining why humans still exist. the explosion will still not touch earth even x years latter so humanity really has nothing to worry about. its highly unlikely but its still a plausible idea

  • 06.02.2006 4:09 AM PDT

Quick as a razor, sharp as a bullet.

Posted by: N0RIEGA
I went to dictionary.com and looked up radii. apparently it is plural for radius. that would mean the halos only destroyed life on three lines extending frome the galactic core. once you stop to think about it is actually quite probable. the forunner had the three lines positioned to destroy the planets containing sentiate life at the time. considering the forruner lived a long time ago this would have been long before the evolition of man the three lines wouldn't touch earth, explaining why humans still exist. the explosion will still not touch earth even x years latter so humanity really has nothing to worry about. its highly unlikely but its still a plausible idea


the halo blasts are in circles not lines. that is the most effective way of covering a large area.

  • 06.02.2006 4:27 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Tartan 118
Posted by: N0RIEGA
I went to dictionary.com and looked up radii. apparently it is plural for radius. that would mean the halos only destroyed life on three lines extending frome the galactic core. once you stop to think about it is actually quite probable. the forunner had the three lines positioned to destroy the planets containing sentiate life at the time. considering the forruner lived a long time ago this would have been long before the evolition of man the three lines wouldn't touch earth, explaining why humans still exist. the explosion will still not touch earth even x years latter so humanity really has nothing to worry about. its highly unlikely but its still a plausible idea


the halo blasts are in circles not lines. that is the most effective way of covering a large area.


you missed the whole point. radii is the unit of measurement guiltry spark uses for the halo explosion. radii is plural for radius. a radius is a line that connects the center of a circle to the edge of the same circle. is it a bit more clear for you now?

  • 06.02.2006 4:41 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: N0RIEGA
Posted by: Tartan 118
Posted by: N0RIEGA
I went to dictionary.com and looked up radii. apparently it is plural for radius. that would mean the halos only destroyed life on three lines extending frome the galactic core. once you stop to think about it is actually quite probable. the forunner had the three lines positioned to destroy the planets containing sentiate life at the time. considering the forruner lived a long time ago this would have been long before the evolition of man the three lines wouldn't touch earth, explaining why humans still exist. the explosion will still not touch earth even x years latter so humanity really has nothing to worry about. its highly unlikely but its still a plausible idea


the halo blasts are in circles not lines. that is the most effective way of covering a large area.


you missed the whole point. radii is the unit of measurement guiltry spark uses for the halo explosion. radii is plural for radius. a radius is a line that connects the center of a circle to the edge of the same circle. is it a bit more clear for you now?


yes its clear, but you're wrong
lets represent one of the radii as X. When you say 3X, as in 3 radii from the galactic core, that means the length of the radii times 3, not 3 radii next to each other.

  • 06.02.2006 5:00 AM PDT

Quick as a razor, sharp as a bullet.

Posted by: d3adeye
Posted by: N0RIEGA
Posted by: Tartan 118
Posted by: N0RIEGA
I went to dictionary.com and looked up radii. apparently it is plural for radius. that would mean the halos only destroyed life on three lines extending frome the galactic core. once you stop to think about it is actually quite probable. the forunner had the three lines positioned to destroy the planets containing sentiate life at the time. considering the forruner lived a long time ago this would have been long before the evolition of man the three lines wouldn't touch earth, explaining why humans still exist. the explosion will still not touch earth even x years latter so humanity really has nothing to worry about. its highly unlikely but its still a plausible idea


the halo blasts are in circles not lines. that is the most effective way of covering a large area.


you missed the whole point. radii is the unit of measurement guiltry spark uses for the halo explosion. radii is plural for radius. a radius is a line that connects the center of a circle to the edge of the same circle. is it a bit more clear for you now?


yes its clear, but you're wrong
lets represent one of the radii as X. When you say 3X, as in 3 radii from the galactic core, that means the length of the radii times 3, not 3 radii next to each other.


these three radii added together would equal (let's say) 3r. this 3r is the radius of a super circle

  • 06.02.2006 5:02 AM PDT

Wow, geometry isn't anybody's strong point in here, is it?

  • 06.02.2006 5:05 AM PDT

Quick as a razor, sharp as a bullet.

Posted by: dmbfan09
Wow, geometry isn't anybody's strong point in here, is it?


what? no, i'm right!

  • 06.02.2006 5:08 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2