- Pulse Cloud
- |
- Noble Member
18 years old, member since 2009.
Posted by: DrBunsenHoneydew
Generally, yes there's a correlation between account age and real age. The correlation coefficient is about -1.2, meaning that for every year of account age, the user is about 1.2 years older.
Shouldn't that coefficient be either 1.2 or 1.2^-1 (depending on the relation: [realAge = k * accountAge] or [accountAge = k * realAge] respectively) instead of being negative?
Also,
>for every year of account age, the user is about 1.2 years older.
My account is 2012 - 2009 = 3 years old.
3 * 1.2 = 3.6
I'm not 3.6 years old.
Wat.