Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo Reach was the worst Halo
  • Subject: Halo Reach was the worst Halo
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Halo Reach was the worst Halo
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: nicksta14

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: daleje28079
you are dumb you said back when bungie was around they had good games but they also made reach so technically your saying reach is a good game but you state it as a bad game make up your mind


loltechnicalities. And with your grammar you're in no position to be calling others dumb.

>Starting your sentence with "and"
>No inclusion of the comma after "grammar"

mfw


Both of which are perfectly 'legal'. If I were writing a novel I would have put the comma. The 'and' was there to add on to my last sentence, but also signify that it was not part of the same point.

Point?

  • 04.29.2012 6:14 PM PDT

/s

Cos you're bad.

  • 04.29.2012 6:18 PM PDT

Posted by: Darkside Eric
So basically... Waypoint is pro-vanilla?

Posted by: Sentox6
Waypoint isn't pro-anything so much as they're just anti-intelligence.


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: nicksta14

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: daleje28079
you are dumb you said back when bungie was around they had good games but they also made reach so technically your saying reach is a good game but you state it as a bad game make up your mind


loltechnicalities. And with your grammar you're in no position to be calling others dumb.

>Starting your sentence with "and"
>No inclusion of the comma after "grammar"

mfw


Both of which are perfectly 'legal'. If I were writing a novel I would have put the comma. The 'and' was there to add on to my last sentence, but also signify that it was not part of the same point.

Point?

My point is that one who is lacking impeccable grammar is in absolutely no position to criticize the grammar of others. Your beginning of a sentence with 'and', although generally accepted within common grammar rules, is both entirely unnecessary and easily avoidable.

I don't pride myself on my grammar by any means, I'm simply pointing out that you decided to correct somebody else while making errors of your own.

  • 04.29.2012 6:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: nicksta14

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: nicksta14

Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: daleje28079
you are dumb you said back when bungie was around they had good games but they also made reach so technically your saying reach is a good game but you state it as a bad game make up your mind


loltechnicalities. And with your grammar you're in no position to be calling others dumb.

>Starting your sentence with "and"
>No inclusion of the comma after "grammar"

mfw


Both of which are perfectly 'legal'. If I were writing a novel I would have put the comma. The 'and' was there to add on to my last sentence, but also signify that it was not part of the same point.

Point?

My point is that one who is lacking impeccable grammar is in absolutely no position to criticize the grammar of others. Your beginning of a sentence with 'and', although generally accepted within common grammar rules, is both entirely unnecessary and easily avoidable.

I don't pride myself on my grammar by any means, I'm simply pointing out that you decided to correct somebody else while making errors of your own.


It isn't an error; it was intentional. It's how I write. It's pretty much a habit at this point, much the same as how people tend to talk a certain way, use certain words. And I see no reason to change that.

With him, on the other hand, I don't know what he was thinking. 'I've decided to throw intelligence out the window and not even attempt to form a coherent statement!' It doesn't take very long to capitalize certain letters and add a form of punctuation to the end of your sentences.

  • 04.29.2012 6:29 PM PDT

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: nicksta14



Why the hell are you having a fight over grammar?

  • 04.29.2012 6:33 PM PDT

Shoryuken!

Mythic Mode Progress on Reach:
Winter Contingency, perfection.
Other levels in progress.

1. No one gives a flying -blam!- about grammar, this is the internet.

2. No that's too early! You have to wait for uncut gameplay!

No wait a minute! You have to wait for a beta!

Still too early, you have to wait until the game comes out to properly judge it!

It's ok, they are going to patch it! Wait until the patch!

Why are you complaining? It's too late, wait until the next game comes out.

3. Posted by: TXI Silver
Trolling successful. lolololo~

  • 04.29.2012 6:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Save Lives. Go Vegan.

I agree with about 65% of OP.

Reach is the best Halo: Yes.
CE and H2 pwn: Yes.
H2 is the best Halo: No, CE is.
H3 was alright: No, it was more than alright, it pwned as much as CE and H2.
ODST had the best music: No but Reach is worse, it doesn't even have the Halo theme.
DMR is not BR: Yes. DMR sucks, BR pwns.
Jetpacks ruined MP: Yes, along with the rest of the AAs.
N00bs leveled up w/o skill: So true.
COD is better: No, COD is even worse.
Halo 4: No, it won't be as bad as Reach but it will still have some of the same flaws like AAs including jetpack, and the 'BR' won't really be the BR, they just call it a BR to make people buy the game.

  • 04.29.2012 10:10 PM PDT

Seems like Reach was a test game:

"Let's see how much crap we can pack into multiplayer to determine how we should proceed with Halo 4"

End result? "Well, I guess sprint is OK."

  • 04.30.2012 1:33 AM PDT

Sometimes it lasts to love ~
~ but sometimes it hurts instead...

  • 04.30.2012 3:09 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Elder Legendary Member
  • gamertag: Zutboy
  • user homepage:

H: CE - Amazing.
Halo 2 - Revolutionary.
Halo 3 - Decent.
Halo Reach- An epic fail of monumental proportions.
░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

H: CE - Amazing.
Halo 2 - Revolutionary.
Halo 3 - Decent.
Halo Reach- An epic fail of monumental proportions.

I'm not even going to bother with halo 4

  • 04.30.2012 5:10 AM PDT

Why even bother, really?
I rage.


Posted by: Dylan Mulenburg
Reach is the best Halo: Yes.
H2 is the best Halo: No, CE is.

Lol.

  • 04.30.2012 8:11 AM PDT

Halo 2 > Halo 3 > Halo 3 ODST > Halo Reach > Halo CE

Based on campaigns.

I only judge on campaigns, and I believe Reach to be the second worst Halo campaign before CE

However, I don't think any campaigns are bad. I just think Reach and CE are the least good

Halo 2 > Halo 3 > Halo 3: ODST > Halo Reach > Halo CE

  • 04.30.2012 9:27 AM PDT

Owning Noobs Since 05

"I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming in terror like his passengers."

Jim Harkins

IMO The worst Halo was ODST probably just because it doesn't really have multiplayer. Reach is good but its not the best Halo. I don't like how anybody can rank up for just being there. The good thing about that is that you don't really get cheated but it makes it less competitive for me, now I really don't care if I win or lose.

[Edited on 04.30.2012 9:33 AM PDT]

  • 04.30.2012 9:33 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3