- An average gamer
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Posted by: Mark V guy
So why cant they include both of them side by side instead of -blam!- with one thing because the other side doesn't like it? They should have left bleed through. Just because one side of the community doesn't play it doesn't mean they should mess it up for the people who do. Just like how they should have just implemented a TU Team Slayer straight away instead of having this voting crap about replacing vanilla slayer, then taking the results if that to -blam!- up the entire game. Ridiculous
Bleedthrough was removed, I would assume, because it didn't perform consistently. The game was designed with no-bleedthrough in mind and removing it made the game hiccup from time to time. I think bleedthrough was completely removed again with the competitive mindset in mind (and before you bring it up, no, double meleers are hardly an issue if you are even somewhat of a skillful shot/tactician).
TU Slayer IS side by side with regular slayer now. I think 343 wanted to get a sense of what the community thought by allowing the vote. If one was overwhelmingly supported, the other would have been fully phased out. Since neither won by a landslide, both were kept.
343 does tend to listen once enough noise is made. I would imagine that if enough is said, ZB will probably be a constant second/third option.