Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: How can you be so bad at this game?
  • Subject: How can you be so bad at this game?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: How can you be so bad at this game?

Join Halo Haven for all things related to Halo 4


Tell her that If you jingle my bells, Ill promise you a white Christmas - Call Me Venom
The world can't end next month. My yogurt expires in 2013 - Princess Cadence
If Apple invented a car, would it have windows? - Xxembers

trolling the Reach forum in 2012?

  • 05.11.2012 11:52 PM PDT

/s

Then why do you still get mad?

  • 05.12.2012 12:26 AM PDT

Posted by:aBlueBookshelf
*sigh*
Can't wait to read your hateful comments on Halo 4.

  • 05.12.2012 1:01 AM PDT

How about you all suck because you play Reach? LMFAO XD

  • 05.12.2012 6:20 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf

Posted by: Seven
Idk, why don't you tell me why you are so bad Bookshelf?
BECAUSE PAYNE

The name is Payne, Max Payne.

  • 05.12.2012 6:29 AM PDT

I honestly can't tell if you think these kinds of threads are still funny or if you really just enjoy annoying people. Either way, it's gotten old. :/

  • 05.12.2012 6:50 AM PDT

Halo 2 > Halo 3 > Halo 3 ODST > Halo Reach > Halo CE

Based on campaigns.

Not all of us have steady aim, super fast reflexes and good situational awareness

  • 05.12.2012 9:15 AM PDT

There are many powers in the world, for good or for evil. Some are greater than I am. Against some I have not yet been measured. But my time is coming.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Forum Rules
List of Forum Ninjas

In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.

  • 05.12.2012 9:24 AM PDT

Searching solo.

None of my friends play Reach. They all play COD or NHL instead.

  • 05.12.2012 10:29 AM PDT

Posted by: HiredN00bs
Arrogant hyperbolic exclamations of woe? Seems like a normal day for Halo/Bungie.net.

when did derpshelf become a troll

did i miss something

  • 05.12.2012 10:56 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Heroic Member

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
global warming isn't proven and won't be - it's more of a political play for funding for "research"

So then by that logic, players who do well at the game are even worse.

Eh bookshelf?

  • 05.12.2012 4:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Sometimes, I dream about cheese.


Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
So what are your excuses?
whenever i shot him, he armour locked!

  • 05.12.2012 4:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm not bad, just god tier...


What?

  • 05.12.2012 5:08 PM PDT


Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.

[Edited on 05.12.2012 6:33 PM PDT]

  • 05.12.2012 6:33 PM PDT

~ Videogames are my favorite videogames ~

Can't be designed for bad people.
They don't hit me in normal reach but hit me just fine in TU with the DMR.

  • 05.12.2012 7:09 PM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

I've found that Action Sack is awesome recently, except when you get Haloball and Hockey.

  • 05.12.2012 7:14 PM PDT


Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.


Every kill in the game is accompanied by a death. Every good player gets a good score, and the enemy gets a bad score (or maybe put together).

  • 05.13.2012 1:27 AM PDT

There are many powers in the world, for good or for evil. Some are greater than I am. Against some I have not yet been measured. But my time is coming.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Forum Rules
List of Forum Ninjas

Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.
What do you believe? Everyone should have a positive k/d ratio? How can there be good players without bad ones? It's all relative. There is an inevitable bell curve.

[Edited on 05.13.2012 7:22 AM PDT]

  • 05.13.2012 7:21 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

Posted by: AK FROST
Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.


Did you ever pass a math class?

  • 05.13.2012 7:24 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

This is where I go to burn off some steam from all that repressed anger I have. If I insulted you on b.net, don't take it literally.


Posted by: Old Papa Rich
Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.
What do you believe? Everyone should have a positive k/d ratio? How can there be good players without bad ones? It's all relative. There is an inevitable bell curve.

Old Papa Rich:1 AK Frosty:0

  • 05.13.2012 6:58 PM PDT


Posted by: Old Papa Rich
Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.
What do you believe? Everyone should have a positive k/d ratio? How can there be good players without bad ones? It's all relative. There is an inevitable bell curve.


Theres bad and then there is just plain stupid, yes there can't be good players without bad. But some do so bad they seem to have a mental handicap. So they are either incredibly stupid or are deranking, either way it gets really annoying if you keep getting put on their team and even if they are on the other team because it isn't fun beating them... I think that is what he is saying, and I completely agree... Personally I don't think AK is even that good anyways. Maybe above average, but not good. If you can get the highest rank in Reach but not Halo 3 it proves you are not a very good player.

[Edited on 05.13.2012 7:27 PM PDT]

  • 05.13.2012 7:23 PM PDT


Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


This man has common sense.

  • 05.13.2012 8:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"We are Soffish. Soffish are we. We look like real fishies when we're placed into the sea."

Jun is Masterchef

Updating the Spartan when Reach came out.


Posted by: Old Papa Rich
Posted by: AK FROST

Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.

Humble bragging is not a good practice.


No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank.
What do you believe? Everyone should have a positive k/d ratio? How can there be good players without bad ones? It's all relative. There is an inevitable bell curve.


Who knew there was deep philosphy on the Reach forum.

  • 05.13.2012 8:22 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Heroic Member

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
global warming isn't proven and won't be - it's more of a political play for funding for "research"

These threads usually get locked when the OP gets banned?

  • 05.13.2012 8:23 PM PDT

There are many powers in the world, for good or for evil. Some are greater than I am. Against some I have not yet been measured. But my time is coming.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Forum Rules
List of Forum Ninjas

Posted by: ITz DENIED
Theres bad and then there is just plain stupid, yes there can't be good players without bad. But some do so bad they seem to have a mental handicap. So they are either incredibly stupid or are deranking, either way it gets really annoying if you keep getting put on their team and even if they are on the other team because it isn't fun beating them... I think that is what he is saying, and I completely agree... Personally I don't think AK is even that good anyways. Maybe above average, but not good. If you can get the highest rank in Reach but not Halo 3 it proves you are not a very good player.
Yes, some people are stupid. Some may even have a handicap. Others just may lack the reflexes or powers of observation. Others may easily be distracted. Some may just plain not get it, yet still find the game fun to play. I simply do not understand why this is a surprise. People with no athletic ability love to shoot hoops in their driveway.

What I really believe is that people love to say how easy the game is. They then set the bar of being good ridiculously high. Anyone under it is plain awful. It's a way bragging. It's quite unappealing.


Posted by: Clone
These threads usually get locked when the OP gets banned?
Not necessarily, if the ban had nothing to do with this thread.

  • 05.13.2012 8:47 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3