Posted by: Old Papa Rich
Posted by: AK FROST
Posted by: Old Papa Rich
In the OP's world, you can apparently have good without bad. It's a remarkable phenomenon.
Humble bragging is not a good practice.
No, with a game as casualized as Halo Reach was there really isn't any excuse to not be good at a game with so many random factors put into matchmaking. Anyone with a brain and fingers can be good at Reach. Casuals wanted an easier game, but then they complain when we adapted still and they continue to sit where they did in Halo 3 minus the rank. What do you believe? Everyone should have a positive k/d ratio? How can there be good players without bad ones? It's all relative. There is an inevitable bell curve.
Theres bad and then there is just plain stupid, yes there can't be good players without bad. But some do so bad they seem to have a mental handicap. So they are either incredibly stupid or are deranking, either way it gets really annoying if you keep getting put on their team and even if they are on the other team because it isn't fun beating them... I think that is what he is saying, and I completely agree... Personally I don't think AK is even that good anyways. Maybe above average, but not good. If you can get the highest rank in Reach but not Halo 3 it proves you are not a very good player.
[Edited on 05.13.2012 7:27 PM PDT]