- McCrash
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
ZomG, for those people wanting to know everything, this is not my Main tag anymore, (McCrash IS for Posting on B.net)
Original XbL Gamertag, zeDutchKreatiVz, as you guessed, Im Dutch/from Holland/Amsterdam.
...Also wTf happened to Halo.......*sighs*
Any day All Day, Halo 3 > Reach
EVERYONE knows, How easy Reach is. Literally Hitscan Noobs.
2 v 1 in 4v4 Reach the one guy loses.
2 v 1 in 4v4 Halo 3 the one guy wins.
Reach > the bad players have an equal chance to win a battle against a better player.
Halo 3 > the bad players will get teabagged because of no strafing.
and Crouching isn't strafing....is it?
Halo 3 has Ghandi hop. Halo 3 wins.
Internet connection has been a problem on console most of the time so don't whine about that.
Hitscan = COD Gameplay....Seriously
Halo 3's Battle Rifle55 REQUIRED the User Aiming WHILST Firing.
Ofcourse Freakin Badkids gonna whine, they held the reticule where the player WAS, and DID NOT AIM FURTHER TO WHERE HE WAS MOVING.
Honestly, if anyone is of opinion that....Halo Reach is better, than I know enough about that person to think what I want to think.
Also lol at the HUGE Hitboxes in Reach/ yes they Said somewhere that it's equivalent to that of 3, but....no it is not.
You REALLY needed to aim well with that sniper in 3 if you want to hit his face.
The auto aim is so bad in Reach that you just 'strafe' over his face area, and shoot.. whoop-die-fu**ing-doo.
Yes, I play Reach, but why not? New is NOT always better, as we've seen by now, yet I could not give (-) /-\ |_ (*) up for any other SHooter game out there.
And in the end, it really doesn't matter which game is better, because everyone Moves forward, even the Sheeple who don't want to.
EDIT: Also.....I win :D
[Edited on 05.20.2012 9:45 AM PDT]