- Clone
- |
- Intrepid Heroic Member
Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
global warming isn't proven and won't be - it's more of a political play for funding for "research"
Posted by: Darkness TB
Zero isn't even in SFxT. And well, your whole fighting game example is way off. Competitive fighting game players don't run around -blam!-ing about characters and wanting them removed
I meant MvC3, mistake.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Street Fighter 2 HD Remix
Street Fighter 3: Third Strike
Soulcalibur
Soulcalibur 4
Who doesn't complain? So no complaining is legit unless it's about the Battle Rifle getting removed or Armor Lock ending your splatter spree in the ghost?
Although Ghost is correct. I enjoy Reach,
Because you like Reach, you think it makes me more "idiotic"? So you agree(As you clearly stated), which means you "liking" Reach is moot, Very moot, you just felt like siding with the "audience" and ended up tripping over your own words.
comparing EVO to MLG
Who said anything about MLG and EVO? They are both competitive? They both are "1337" gamers? And they both like to win and get games changed based on the fact they can't beat the new guy/gun/whatever.
And bottom line, you assumed "competitive" and MLG/EVO walk together? They don't.
Get a dictionary and learn what "competitive" means, you guys consistently keep misusing it.
But at least I started to learn that for all the perceived complaining they are right.
This was aimed at what? I'm proposing with this reply that you guys are "losers", The complaining about something other than the topic "Splitting the fanbase", is moot here, the same way sticking to "Halo: Reach" forums to keep saying about much you dislike "Halo: Reach".
You could choose to love a game, or to hate another.
They could be sharing love for Halo 2/3 but they rather express "hatred" here in for "Halo: Reach" in the "Halo: Reach" forum.
"Halo: Reach" has TU, who is still complaining? They got what they want changed right? Halo 4 has a Battle Rifle? If Reach was really just terrible game, they would have forgot it already.
The thing that "Competitive" players hate about Reach so much, is one thing.
They could go back to Halo 3 all day, they already sold that "bad game" that is lolReach.
Like most games that are bad, people take it back, get a refund and say they "don't like it".
But Reach? No, they complained, complained, complained.
343i favored the "competitive" crowd, changed the game(Or half the game types).
And yet their still here, why? Because of the remaining playlist, people are still enjoying a game they hate, so they can't let them all be happy play something they were no good at.
People say, "I hate Armor Lock!" In the Team Slayer playlist, why aren't they in Super Slayer? It's obvious now isn't it?
They were no good at Halo: Reach, they feel small, so now everyone must know.
How do I know? If they "easily" got around Armor Lock and the other abilities, they wouldn't hate them, they would have no reason as it doesn't stop their "ob3r skillz" but it does, and that's proof because all the armor lock hate comments explains one thing.
They die.
Another thing is sword block, something that didn't "slow down" gameplay, they hated it simply because their prey has options to survive.
Sword block very rarely lets you kill the sword user unless you have a power weapon, but it usually lets your shotgun touting teammate kill em, or someone melee him, the kicker?
They die.
It's clearly obvious, they want "less" defensive options and more offensive, they like fast kill times and have nothing on their mind then "headshot".
Another piece of evidence is found right here.
"Competitive" players don't want CE/Reach/ODST players to have fun in a game they can't win at.
Look at the pool, they want the community dead.
Why? Because if they don't like it, nobody can play it, and why don't they like it?
They die.... a lot.
Splitting a fanbase will do no negative.
People who disliked Reach won't buy another Reach-esque game.
People who disliked 2/3 or wasn't into Halo before Reach won't buy Battle Rifle 4.
Splitting the fanbase would let both players play what they want, but a Halo game they can't win at just can't exist to the "competitive" players eyes.
Until Halo: Reach becomes Halo 3.1, they will actively hate on Reach forums for as long they play Halo.
Another piece of evidence clearly stated earlier, as to how their "complaining" is active "hate".
This is a "Halo: Reach" forum.
Whenever Reach came out.
Armor Lock stopped their grenade spams.
Active Camo made close encounters easier whenever they wielded the sword/shotgun.
Jetpack made their "Sniper" sweet spot easily accessible.
Evade dodge their trigger spamming.
And worst of all to any "competitive" Halo 2/3 player.
They heard the respawn timer.
Cause of the death? They couldn't believe their eyes.
An "@R scu3!" had killed them.
And THAT was the last straw.
Retaliate all you want.
I already know fanboys and facts don't mix.
Congrats on topping the page 1 idiocy I pointed out earlier.