- coolmike699
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
Posted by: Cortland_Brewer
I'm not trying to sound like a whinny brat over here, but these don't sound like actual rules to me. From what I've gathered, If 99/100 mods approve my thread, but mod 100 doesn't, I still get banned/warned. What's the point of enforcing vague rules? If we're not 100% on why we were blacklisted in the first place, we're probably going to eventually make the same mistake again, and learn nothing from it.
Recon, you've admitted that you and the rest of your mods make judgement calls based on how you feel. That leads me to believe there isn't much of a guide line, or you guys just don't follow it very well (I've always assumed the former, but some people think the latter is true).
Sometimes, you can make a Brony thread, and mods will contribute to the thread, and everything is cool. Other times, you can get banned for weeks for the same thread.
Anything with the word "Porch" in it, instantly gets locked/banned, yet it is nowhere in the rules. I know the rule, as well as the reason behind it, but somebody else may not.
What I'm getting at is the rules are not always comprehensive. Sometimes, we make honest mistakes, and honestly, even with the rules in mind, we don't realize we are breaking rules, because most of them aren't specific.
If I need to make an independent thread on this topic, I will, I just need to know where it should go.
You know, this is the first time I can think of that I've completely agreed with something you said.