- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Halo multiplayer sucks!
Based on campaigns
Halo 2 > Halo 3 ODST > Halo 3 > Reach/CE tied
Posted by: Spirit of Ember
Posted by: Water Beetle
Posted by: Dark Hunter21
Posted by: Spirit of Ember
No. Its called aesthetic design change. The Brutes in Halo 2 looked extremely different from the ones in Halo 3, but that doesn't mean they are a different species.
This.
The grunts in Halo 1 must not be grunts then, they had totally different faces.
Drones in Reach don't have rank, must be a different subspecies.
Elites in Reach, H3, H2 are shorter than ones in CE, must be a different species.
Brutes in H2 and H3 look different, must be different species.
Water, your argument doesn't make any sense.
I see what you are saying, but al those differences are explainable. Grunts in Halo CE and 2 have a mask. Drones maybe didn't have rank pre ODST. Elites being shorter might just be the armour, or just elites who aren't as talk. Brutes in Halo 2 and 3 look different because fur was shaved in Halo 3.
But in Reach, they have physically changed the structure of the face. Their faces are flat. In Halo 2 and 3 they had long somewhat canine like jaws. In Reach they look rather more like gorillas.
The Brutes in Halo Reach look similar to the ones in Three. The ones in Halo 2 don't.
They don't. I'm not quite sure how to link image urls on an iPad but google Halo 3 brute, look, and then look at Halo Reach brutes. They are completely different. Or just look up brute screenshots on Halo 3 and then Reach. The only reason Halo 2 brutes look different s because they still have fur