- grey101
- |
- Fabled Mythic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Deva Path
Posted by: DecepticonCobra
We are all going to get banned aren't we?
Posted by: Flaming glacier
I have reason, I'm very dissatisfied with you ability to come to an amicable agreement that, whilst perhaps I could have been more forthcoming with the fact I used the admittedly somewhat crude word 'toolish' in an intendedly helpful way, I did, in fact, use it intendedly helpfully.
And you can not just simply say 'Yes, that's what happened.'
I'm very disappointed.
It was certainly warranted, as it was merely my opinion, the fact you got so offended, despite my continued calm attempts to reassure you I meant no offence is none of my concern, my friend.
Personal insults, another suggestion you ARE annoyed.
It is not a vocabulary problem, I, as I said, could have made it clear sooner, but I didn't, my bad, but we could have still could to an agreement much sooner than now.
Also, as you said, 'toolish' isn't a word, so technically that wouldn't mean I have a limited vocabulary in the usage of it.
Maybe it means I have a super duper hyper extended one.
I never said it was perfectly acceptable to mock people for grammar.
It's simply what I do.
And, in my eyes, it appeared as you were talking down to people, so, in my opinion, which is all this is, you were being toolish.
And lets face it, you obviously have a superiority complex.
The way you talk, the way you act, refusal to back down.
Given, I will not stop posting, but my reasoning for such is to make you not see the error of your own ways, but prove that I meant no offence in mine.
Again, there are no absolutes on the subject of humans undergoing the brevet mutation.
And I do see myself somewhat in the wrong, I could have more forthwith stated my meaning behind the use of the world toolish.
Still, though, you're obviously being petty too, the fact you can't rule yourself into the same category I'm ruling myself into proves that. Especially when you refuse to back down from a 'forum argument' when it is just me, defending myself and being apologetic whenever I can to assure you I did not mean to offend.
Personally, I don't like rude remarks being used against me, but I obviously can't do anything to stop people, and neither can you.
So, if I wish to, I will continue to talk to you how I want, with whatever vulgarities I want.
But I do not wish that.
I wish only to show you I meant no harm.
And, again, with all due respect, you were pretty plainly saying 'do what I want or I'll keep it up'.
Again, all due respect and all, that's very childish, especially when I'm just trying to halt the argument, find common ground and you're trying to prove my seeking of peace wrong.
I know, it's not my place, but I took that right.
I have, since, apologized for any ill meaning that could have come along with it.
So where's the problem here?
The common denominator is you.
One needs not use rude words or make a smart ass remark to be the offender, again, I used an inflammatory term and for that I apologize, but I pointed out later that the way I used it was intended to be helpful.
Again, I understand this could be taken to PM, but at the same time I could be taking this to PM, YOU could be taking the first step and sending ME a PM.
So please, don't get on a high horse and say 'we could have stopped this anytime'.
That's kind of been my message the entire time you've been prolonging this.
Can we please come to an amicable understanding that, whilst I was in the wrong, you could have handled this with a little more grace?
If not, then please don't bother responding.
I've stopped caring, you're obviously taking every little thing I'm saying personally, and I'd rather not cause you to grow angrier or offend you any more than I already have.
Again, Elder, there are no absolutes in this situation.
The fact you can not accept that is no concern of mine.
We're done with the conversation, I apologise for taking your time.
That is what i have been trying to get you to admit this entire time. So there we have it.
opinions don't equally what is needed and it would have been best for you to keep it to yourself or in a PM. If i see you say i got offended one more time the i am seriously going to flip.
personal insults yet the entire basis off this was because you said my words were toolish. I highly suggest you stop saying i am "offended" "angry" and or "annoyed" because that is what is getting me upset not the cause of the argument. not to mention you tried saying i had ego issues and a complex, which is highly rude.
Lets face that i do not have s superiority complex and you clearly don't understand what that means and have ignored the several times i posted why i won't drop this. I made it clear that i am not going to allow uncalled for remarks fly which has nothing to do with me being superior when that is clearly your interpretation of the events which does not make it factual.
"The way you talk, the way you act, refusal to back down."
Which has absolutely nothing to do with a complex and would be explained if you just read.
"apologetic whenever I can to assure you I did not mean to offend."
But i wanted you to acknowledge that it was a rather stupid choice of words to say someones words were "toolish" and expect them to get happy about you randomly "helping" them.
"And, again, with all due respect, you were pretty plainly saying 'do what I want or I'll keep it up'."
I have been saying " acknowledge what you did was incredibly stupid and rude then i will stop". You seriously cannot call me childish when you haven't been acting any better than me by refusing to see that what you said was stupid and ignoring the several times where i stated i wanted you to just say that and drop it. Not to mention nearly every remark you made was childish along with trying to act like you are the only mature one here.
"I have, since, apologized for any ill meaning that could have come along with it.
So where's the problem here?
The common denominator is you."
You do understand "apologizing" and then turning right back around and saying i am the "problem" before i can even respond to the apology completely negates it correct?
"Again, I understand this could be taken to PM, but at the same time I could be taking this to PM, YOU could be taking the first step and sending ME a PM.
So please, don't get on a high horse and say 'we could have stopped this anytime'.
That's kind of been my message the entire time you've been prolonging this."
I am not going to PM you because you think i need improvement. You took it upon yourself to post and opinion that you should have kept to yourself as id you had the right to make such a call. So if you were seriously trying to be helpful then you would have just simply messaged me once you saw where it was going if that was truly your intentions, because normal people normally do that.
"Can we please come to an amicable understanding that, whilst I was in the wrong, you could have handled this with a little more grace?"
Which is the problem you don't understand and elder tried telling you, I am handling this with Grace.
"If not, then please don't bother responding.
I've stopped caring, you're obviously taking every little thing I'm saying personally, and I'd rather not cause you to grow angrier or offend you any more than I already have."
If you know i won't stop responding i don't know why you would post that but then again you have shown a habit of not reading and understanding. Yet I accepted the apology even though it was negated in the same post. though if i see one more thing by you about me being upset i am going to go @p3sh1t