Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: Whats the chance of chief undergoing a brevet mutation?
  • Subject: Whats the chance of chief undergoing a brevet mutation?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Whats the chance of chief undergoing a brevet mutation?


Posted by: Elder Bias

Posted by: Flaming glacier

Also, Elder.
All that being said, you have proved one thing.
It is highly, HIGHLY unlikely that a human could undergo a forerunner mutation at all, let alone a brevet.
As I said, highly unlikely.
Not impossible, we can not state that without proper sources, stalwart evidence, which we do not have, we have no absolutes.
Thank you for pointing that out.


Then you have no evidence that it is not "impossible". Which, your claim is no longer applicable to this anymore.

Now, kindly drop the claim and move along until you have some evidence to bring it up.


And you have none that it is 100% not possible.
Like I said, we have no absolutes.
It would seem that human's could not undergo such a thing, the evidence is heavily, ridiculously weighed against them.
But, again.
There are no absolutes.
We can accept that amicably, can we not?

  • 07.28.2012 5:43 PM PDT

What the hell? Why is everyone fighting?

  • 07.28.2012 5:45 PM PDT


Posted by: Old Salty27
What the hell? Why is everyone fighting?
]
Some intended constructive criticism got took out of hand.
Admitted, I could have been more direct in my nature of the usage of the world 'toolish', but the fact that it's still going on in lieu of the fact that I pointed out the nature of the usage is somewhat unacceptable.

[Edited on 07.28.2012 5:46 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 5:46 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier

And you have none that it is 100% not possible.
Like I said, we have no absolutes.
It would seem that human's could not undergo such a thing, the evidence is heavily, ridiculously weighed against them.
But, again.
There are no absolutes.
We can accept that amicably, can we not?


I already did... it's called Cryptum. Read the book.

Can you not read what I said?

  • 07.28.2012 5:53 PM PDT

I can.
You presented me no absolutes.
Just it being astronomically weighted towards the implication that humans can not undergo such mutations.
No absolutes, though.

Also, I don't believe the halo books are worth it.
The only gaming series to publish books that I am actually into so far is the Mass Effect series.
They had a very interesting one pertaining to what happened with Commander Shephards corpse.


We obviously can not come to an amicable agreement, would it not be logical for us to stop talking to one another?
I've suggested the same thing with Grey, it did not work, is it possible I could apply it in this situation?

[Edited on 07.28.2012 5:58 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 5:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Flaming glacier

Posted by: grey101
You cannot complain about it escalating when i gave you the option to handle this privately and asked for it to stop.

Who said i was angry? I haven't lashed out or called you a single name. You don't know me and you have never spoke with me so stop acting as if you know how i act when i am upset because i am not and it would be clear if i was.

There is absolutely no logic in telling somebody what they said was "toolish" and then trying to label that as helpful as a cop-out for saying something rude and uncalled for.

This has nothing to do with ego mister "If there is a single misspelled word in a sentence i cannot read it" which is funny because you said "toolish".

Not being very logical about it since you could just stop replying or move it to PMs as i will not stop.

You cannot say that is petty when it was correct. Randomly saying someones words were "toolish", labeling that as "helpful", and then telling that person they were hiding behind someone else is petty.

Your views are the very cause of all this because you see help ass "offensive" and telling somebody their words are "toolish" as helpful.


I don't feel the need to handle this privately, as it is not an argument, or a debate, it's simply me stating, and to an extent, trying to prove my peaceful intent to you.

With all due respect, it's fairly clear from the way you're acting you're a tad annoyed by the situation.

There is logic in that, I pointed out exactly what it was intended to be, it's no fault of my own you took it the wrong way. The word 'toolish' alone is not helpful, but the message afterwards should have rendered it far less offensive than how you took it.

I understand, that's fair, you've got me on the subject that I like to casually, jokingly mock people who have bad grammar, spelling or sentence structure, whilst using made up words which have clear meaning. Yeah, no big deal really, is it?

'as i will not stop.'
This fragment of a sentence alone suggests you are annoyed, you are now being somewhat openly childish. 'Do what I want or I will not stop.'
People simply can not be indulged when acting this way, it will breed confidence in the usage of such behaviour in the future.

It certainly is not petty, my friend.
I was simply giving advice, it was took WAY out of context, and furthermore proportion.
I never said anyone was hiding behind anyone, simply pointing out the fact that you could stick up for yourself, and that Elder's intervention were not nescessary and, somewhat insulting to you.

Help is not offensive, again, him modi-coddling you, suggesting even in the basest form you NEED him to is certainly offensive.
And I stand by that your words were toolish, I could have been mopre forthcoming in my telling you they were, but I was not, and the message was eventually delivered that I intended it as helpful criticism.
What you did with that message was none of my business.
However, what you DID with that message, was get all offended and begin to flame me.
Bravo.
You truly are the veteran this forum needs.
Can you please leave me alone now?
This meaningless argument serves only as forum spam.



Grey, I apologize if the catapulted the subject off course line offended you.
Would you like me to remove it?


Also, Elder.
All that being said, you have proved one thing.
It is highly, HIGHLY unlikely that a human could undergo a forerunner mutation at all, let alone a brevet.
As I said, highly unlikely.
Not impossible, we can not state that without proper sources, stalwart evidence, which we do not have, we have no absolutes.
Thank you for pointing that out.



Then you have no reason to be dissatisfied with how things progressed.

I am not, there is no tone whatsoever in my post. I just want it to be clear that your statement wasn't warranted and for such reason i will not accept it.

It is your fault for having such a limited vocabulary that you for some reason though "toolish" would come off as helpful.

So you can mock people for grammar but when i put things in bold for a actual and specific reason i am being "toolish" and then have some sort of complex.


It only isn't petty because you refuse to see yourself in the wrong or see the portability of you being wrong even though you won't rule out a human undergoing a forerunner transformation.


I am not being childish in stating that i will not have somebody say rude remarks against me and then let them have the impression that they will be able to to this at will. I see the same in your actions hence my stance.

It wasn't insulting in the least bit though i find it funny how you find that insulting but not "toolish".


I got no implication of the sort when he came into this thread. The message was never received because it wasn't helpful. It wasn't your business in the first place to decide what i could improve on but you took that upon yourself.

I am not offended i just want you to understand that what you said was in no way helpful and would have been taken offensively. Stop saying i am attacking you and flaming you because i am not. I haven't said a single smartass remark i am known for this entire time.



"Can you please leave me alone now?"

I wasn't talking to you in the first place next time keep to yourself.


"This meaningless argument serves only as forum spam."

Then why didn't you just PM me?

  • 07.28.2012 5:59 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier
I can.
You presented me no absolutes.
Just it being astronomically weighted towards the implication that humans can not undergo such mutations.
No absolutes, though.


It is still impossible. Once again, read what I said.

Also, I don't believe the halo books are worth it.
The only gaming series to publish books that I am actually into so far is the Mass Effect series.
They had a very interesting one pertaining to what happened with Commander Shephards corpse.


Great way to help your argument. You said Halo novels are not worth it which it means that you are not willing to provide any evidence which, you will have to drop the claim immediately.
And about shepard stuff, it's completely irrelevant to this topic.

We obviously can not come to an amicable agreement, would it not be logical for us to stop talking to one another?
I've suggested the same thing with Grey, it did not work, is it possible I could apply it in this situation?


You can do it by drop the claim on "possibility" of human being undergoing the brevet mutation.

  • 07.28.2012 6:02 PM PDT

I have reason, I'm very dissatisfied with you ability to come to an amicable agreement that, whilst perhaps I could have been more forthcoming with the fact I used the admittedly somewhat crude word 'toolish' in an intendedly helpful way, I did, in fact, use it intendedly helpfully.
And you can not just simply say 'Yes, that's what happened.'
I'm very disappointed.

It was certainly warranted, as it was merely my opinion, the fact you got so offended, despite my continued calm attempts to reassure you I meant no offence is none of my concern, my friend.

Personal insults, another suggestion you ARE annoyed.
It is not a vocabulary problem, I, as I said, could have made it clear sooner, but I didn't, my bad, but we could have still could to an agreement much sooner than now.
Also, as you said, 'toolish' isn't a word, so technically that wouldn't mean I have a limited vocabulary in the usage of it.
Maybe it means I have a super duper hyper extended one.

I never said it was perfectly acceptable to mock people for grammar.
It's simply what I do.
And, in my eyes, it appeared as you were talking down to people, so, in my opinion, which is all this is, you were being toolish.
And lets face it, you obviously have a superiority complex.
The way you talk, the way you act, refusal to back down.
Given, I will not stop posting, but my reasoning for such is to make you not see the error of your own ways, but prove that I meant no offence in mine.


Again, there are no absolutes on the subject of humans undergoing the brevet mutation.
And I do see myself somewhat in the wrong, I could have more forthwith stated my meaning behind the use of the world toolish.
Still, though, you're obviously being petty too, the fact you can't rule yourself into the same category I'm ruling myself into proves that. Especially when you refuse to back down from a 'forum argument' when it is just me, defending myself and being apologetic whenever I can to assure you I did not mean to offend.

Personally, I don't like rude remarks being used against me, but I obviously can't do anything to stop people, and neither can you.
So, if I wish to, I will continue to talk to you how I want, with whatever vulgarities I want.
But I do not wish that.
I wish only to show you I meant no harm.
And, again, with all due respect, you were pretty plainly saying 'do what I want or I'll keep it up'.
Again, all due respect and all, that's very childish, especially when I'm just trying to halt the argument, find common ground and you're trying to prove my seeking of peace wrong.

I know, it's not my place, but I took that right.
I have, since, apologized for any ill meaning that could have come along with it.
So where's the problem here?
The common denominator is you.

One needs not use rude words or make a smart ass remark to be the offender, again, I used an inflammatory term and for that I apologize, but I pointed out later that the way I used it was intended to be helpful.

Again, I understand this could be taken to PM, but at the same time I could be taking this to PM, YOU could be taking the first step and sending ME a PM.
So please, don't get on a high horse and say 'we could have stopped this anytime'.
That's kind of been my message the entire time you've been prolonging this.


Can we please come to an amicable understanding that, whilst I was in the wrong, you could have handled this with a little more grace?

If not, then please don't bother responding.
I've stopped caring, you're obviously taking every little thing I'm saying personally, and I'd rather not cause you to grow angrier or offend you any more than I already have.



Again, Elder, there are no absolutes in this situation.
The fact you can not accept that is no concern of mine.
We're done with the conversation, I apologise for taking your time.


[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:15 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:14 PM PDT

I'd never thought I'd say this on a sci-fi gaming forum, but for the love of all that is holy you guys are going overboard about the possibility of a cyborg from the future can undergo the same wacky mutation as a humanoid alien in a video game. Sit back, take a few breaths and chill out. Yes someone took a criticism out of context and over-reacted, then someone else went on the defense and now there is a flame war. Just agree to disagree and let it go. This entire thread is just coming up with theories to a question that we may very well get the answer to come the fall. MC could go through a mutation and grow boobs for all we know in Halo 4. This a forum meant to have civil debate and fun. Don't ruin that.

  • 07.28.2012 6:17 PM PDT


Posted by: Old Salty27
Yes someone took a criticism out of context and over-reacted


You see, Grey?
I had no intent to ruffle any feathers you may or may not have had.
Can we just end it there and stop this childishness?
I'm in no way annoyed at you, or anything, this is just getting out of hand.
And before you start talking about me 'taking it to PM'.
Ask yourself, if you want that so much, why haven't YOU done it?
I don't WANT to take it to PM.
I just want you to accept we were both in the wrong, nothing is to be gained from switching to a different form of communication.

  • 07.28.2012 6:21 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier
Again, Elder, there are no absolutes in this situation.
The fact you can not accept that is no concern of mine.
We're done with the conversation, I apologise for taking your time.


Again, with poor reading comprehension you have now. Maybe you should look at this for now.

Otherwise, it is still impossible for humans to undergo brevet mutation.

And, how you can make a claim on that if you have not read the Forerunner novels?

Good, you are done with this conversation because you had no evidence suggesting that human beings capable of brevet mutations. Good day to you sir and next time, learn to argue properly and this time, provide some proof for your claims.

[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:22 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:21 PM PDT


Posted by: Elder Bias

Posted by: Flaming glacier
Again, Elder, there are no absolutes in this situation.
The fact you can not accept that is no concern of mine.
We're done with the conversation, I apologise for taking your time.


Again, with poor comprehension you have now. Maybe you should look at this for now.

Otherwise, it is still impossible for humans to undergo brevet mutation.

Good, you are done with this conversation because you had no evidence suggesting that human beings capable of brevet mutations. Good day to you sir and next time, learn to argue properly and this time, provide some proof for your claims.


Again, you obviously want to prolong this, I'm perfectly fine with accepting my beliefs, you obviously accept yours.
I just politely ask you do not insult me or my comprehension or try to shove your beliefs down my throat.
Thank you.

  • 07.28.2012 6:22 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier

Again, you obviously want to prolong this, I'm perfectly fine with accepting my beliefs, you obviously accept yours.
I just politely ask you do not insult me or my comprehension or try to shove your beliefs down my throat.
Thank you.


I am not insulting you, I'm pointing out that you missed what my point is and missed on what I said as well. And, how can you make any claims like that if you have not read the Forerunner novels? Honestly, whoever read this books, would have dismissed this idea instantly.

This is such pointless claim that you made.

[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:25 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:24 PM PDT


Posted by: Elder Bias

Posted by: Flaming glacier

Again, you obviously want to prolong this, I'm perfectly fine with accepting my beliefs, you obviously accept yours.
I just politely ask you do not insult me or my comprehension or try to shove your beliefs down my throat.
Thank you.


I am not insulting you, I'm pointing out that you missed what my point is and missed on what I said as well. And, how can you make any claims like that if you have not read the Forerunner novels? Honestly, whoever read this books, would have dismissed this idea instantly.

This is such pointless claim that you made.


You're being somewhat repetitive.
Stop replying now, okay?
Come back to the ship, we'll bang, okay?

[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:26 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:26 PM PDT

Granted I've gotten into a few ti-raids and flame wars, it happens to everyone eventually here. Mostly over dumb things; I got into a scuffle over bashing Glasslands after skimming through it over the course of three lunch breaks at the bookstore near work. I got called out on it by Roberto(rightfully so, I was in the wrong and should have read it cover to cover before I gave it proper criticism), but he got a little carried away and I ended up not wanting to visit the forums for the better part of the month because I felt like crap. The main point is people every now and again will say something dumb or over-react and at the end of day it's better to just say " Fine, whatever." and just move on in the topic and enjoy the forum.

  • 07.28.2012 6:26 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier

You're being somewhat repetitive.
Stop replying now, okay?
Come back to the ship, we'll bang, okay?


I'm not, because you were constantly saying that it is not impossible for humans beings to undergo brevet mutations. Honestly, you have no idea on how human body works and also no idea on how the biology applied to Humans and Forerunners works considering that you never read the Forerunners novels. Ergo, drop the claim.

  • 07.28.2012 6:28 PM PDT

Pretty much, Salty.
Again, I do apologize to you, Grey, and am, in light of Salty's gospel speech, not willing to continue.
I admitted I was in the wrong and, whilst I believe you were too, I don't need to see that typed out to know that.
Apologies for your time.


Bias, come on now.
Am I not being agreeable?
Did I not politely ask you to NOT force your beliefs down MY throat?
What are you doing, right this second?

[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:30 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:29 PM PDT

Waypoint Moderators aren't really Moderators, just power hungry and its goal is defend their beloved Halo at all costs. (Meaning that they wank Halo too much.)

BS Angel is alleged foe so, be wary of Waypoint and its moderators! Do not attempt to move to Waypoint. Enter your own risk.

*WARNING* IT IS MY OPINION.


Posted by: Flaming glacier
Bias, come on now.
Am I not being agreeable?
Did I not politely ask you to NOT force your beliefs down MY throat?
What are you doing, right this second?


I'm not forcing anything to you, I'm saying that anyone who read the Forerunners novels, would dismiss the claim of possibility of human beings capable of brevet mutation. I don't need to explain every word to you to understand because Grey nicely explained about it.

Ergo, like I said, it is impossible to make a claim without reading any novels. It's like claiming that a kiloton nuke is more powerful than a megaton nuke!


[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:39 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:37 PM PDT

Well, okay, just know I'm done with this, and my beliefs remain unchanged, I accept it could be impossible, but I see no absolutes, I'm fine with being wrong though.

Also, Grey, when you get done with your reply (if you ARE replying), read this.
I'm bored of talking, we seem to be going in circles and that's good for nobody.
Apologies for taking your time.
Peace.

[Edited on 07.28.2012 6:49 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2012 6:48 PM PDT

I like to try re-railing derailed threads.


Posted by: E Sword of LORD
Ninjas with time travel take care of small problems such as this.

Finally somebody understands.

  • 07.28.2012 6:54 PM PDT

Glory and fame, blood is our name!
Souls full of thunder, hearts of steel!
Killers of men, a warrior's friend!
Sworn to avenge our fallen brothers!
Sons of the gods, today we shall die.
Open Valhalla's door!
Let the battle begin, with swords in the wind! Hail Gods of War!


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Arbiter 739

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: hotshot revan II
Master Chief isn't a Forerunner

/Thread


Yeah, kinda impossible for him to go through a physical change the forerunners go though... as he's a human, not a forerunner.


Forerunners were/are humans though, right? What proof shows otherwise?


Cryptum.

They evolved on different planets, but were created by the same Precursors. We look very similar, but I doubt of the Chief would be applicable.

Anything's possible though. If he has the Librarian's genetic touch, it might work.


This might be a strong possibility now that we know what GEAS are. It was hinted at in The Flood, when he activated the light-bridge. I'm surprised it took a decade to establish that as more than Spartan intuition.

  • 07.28.2012 8:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Flaming glacier
I have reason, I'm very dissatisfied with you ability to come to an amicable agreement that, whilst perhaps I could have been more forthcoming with the fact I used the admittedly somewhat crude word 'toolish' in an intendedly helpful way, I did, in fact, use it intendedly helpfully.
And you can not just simply say 'Yes, that's what happened.'
I'm very disappointed.

It was certainly warranted, as it was merely my opinion, the fact you got so offended, despite my continued calm attempts to reassure you I meant no offence is none of my concern, my friend.

Personal insults, another suggestion you ARE annoyed.
It is not a vocabulary problem, I, as I said, could have made it clear sooner, but I didn't, my bad, but we could have still could to an agreement much sooner than now.
Also, as you said, 'toolish' isn't a word, so technically that wouldn't mean I have a limited vocabulary in the usage of it.
Maybe it means I have a super duper hyper extended one.

I never said it was perfectly acceptable to mock people for grammar.
It's simply what I do.
And, in my eyes, it appeared as you were talking down to people, so, in my opinion, which is all this is, you were being toolish.
And lets face it, you obviously have a superiority complex.
The way you talk, the way you act, refusal to back down.
Given, I will not stop posting, but my reasoning for such is to make you not see the error of your own ways, but prove that I meant no offence in mine.


Again, there are no absolutes on the subject of humans undergoing the brevet mutation.
And I do see myself somewhat in the wrong, I could have more forthwith stated my meaning behind the use of the world toolish.
Still, though, you're obviously being petty too, the fact you can't rule yourself into the same category I'm ruling myself into proves that. Especially when you refuse to back down from a 'forum argument' when it is just me, defending myself and being apologetic whenever I can to assure you I did not mean to offend.

Personally, I don't like rude remarks being used against me, but I obviously can't do anything to stop people, and neither can you.
So, if I wish to, I will continue to talk to you how I want, with whatever vulgarities I want.
But I do not wish that.
I wish only to show you I meant no harm.
And, again, with all due respect, you were pretty plainly saying 'do what I want or I'll keep it up'.
Again, all due respect and all, that's very childish, especially when I'm just trying to halt the argument, find common ground and you're trying to prove my seeking of peace wrong.

I know, it's not my place, but I took that right.
I have, since, apologized for any ill meaning that could have come along with it.
So where's the problem here?
The common denominator is you.

One needs not use rude words or make a smart ass remark to be the offender, again, I used an inflammatory term and for that I apologize, but I pointed out later that the way I used it was intended to be helpful.

Again, I understand this could be taken to PM, but at the same time I could be taking this to PM, YOU could be taking the first step and sending ME a PM.
So please, don't get on a high horse and say 'we could have stopped this anytime'.
That's kind of been my message the entire time you've been prolonging this.


Can we please come to an amicable understanding that, whilst I was in the wrong, you could have handled this with a little more grace?

If not, then please don't bother responding.
I've stopped caring, you're obviously taking every little thing I'm saying personally, and I'd rather not cause you to grow angrier or offend you any more than I already have.



Again, Elder, there are no absolutes in this situation.
The fact you can not accept that is no concern of mine.
We're done with the conversation, I apologise for taking your time.



That is what i have been trying to get you to admit this entire time. So there we have it.


opinions don't equally what is needed and it would have been best for you to keep it to yourself or in a PM. If i see you say i got offended one more time the i am seriously going to flip.

personal insults yet the entire basis off this was because you said my words were toolish. I highly suggest you stop saying i am "offended" "angry" and or "annoyed" because that is what is getting me upset not the cause of the argument. not to mention you tried saying i had ego issues and a complex, which is highly rude.


Lets face that i do not have s superiority complex and you clearly don't understand what that means and have ignored the several times i posted why i won't drop this. I made it clear that i am not going to allow uncalled for remarks fly which has nothing to do with me being superior when that is clearly your interpretation of the events which does not make it factual.


"The way you talk, the way you act, refusal to back down."

Which has absolutely nothing to do with a complex and would be explained if you just read.


"apologetic whenever I can to assure you I did not mean to offend."

But i wanted you to acknowledge that it was a rather stupid choice of words to say someones words were "toolish" and expect them to get happy about you randomly "helping" them.

"And, again, with all due respect, you were pretty plainly saying 'do what I want or I'll keep it up'."

I have been saying " acknowledge what you did was incredibly stupid and rude then i will stop". You seriously cannot call me childish when you haven't been acting any better than me by refusing to see that what you said was stupid and ignoring the several times where i stated i wanted you to just say that and drop it. Not to mention nearly every remark you made was childish along with trying to act like you are the only mature one here.



"I have, since, apologized for any ill meaning that could have come along with it.
So where's the problem here?
The common denominator is you."


You do understand "apologizing" and then turning right back around and saying i am the "problem" before i can even respond to the apology completely negates it correct?


"Again, I understand this could be taken to PM, but at the same time I could be taking this to PM, YOU could be taking the first step and sending ME a PM.
So please, don't get on a high horse and say 'we could have stopped this anytime'.
That's kind of been my message the entire time you've been prolonging this."

I am not going to PM you because you think i need improvement. You took it upon yourself to post and opinion that you should have kept to yourself as id you had the right to make such a call. So if you were seriously trying to be helpful then you would have just simply messaged me once you saw where it was going if that was truly your intentions, because normal people normally do that.

"Can we please come to an amicable understanding that, whilst I was in the wrong, you could have handled this with a little more grace?"

Which is the problem you don't understand and elder tried telling you, I am handling this with Grace.


"If not, then please don't bother responding.
I've stopped caring, you're obviously taking every little thing I'm saying personally, and I'd rather not cause you to grow angrier or offend you any more than I already have."

If you know i won't stop responding i don't know why you would post that but then again you have shown a habit of not reading and understanding. Yet I accepted the apology even though it was negated in the same post. though if i see one more thing by you about me being upset i am going to go @p3sh1t

  • 07.28.2012 11:12 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4