- cameo_cream
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
In memory of those fallen in the defense of Earth and her colonies.
March 3, 2553
Posted by: burritosenior
It is. Shows how many facts you know before making claims, mate. Every game ahead of Halo: Reach right now came out after it.
Yet when Halo 3 came out, all new games that came out were, wait for it behind it
Neither is Halo 3.
Would you expect in five years for Reach to be beating a brand new game? No. So why do you compare a five year old game to the present day with a two year old game. Your argument is logically flawed.
And it's beating a five year old game, oh ya think? I would be worried if a sequel was doing worse than a predecessor after five years.
Good thing it isn't doing worse than its predecessor then, despite the ravings of a bunch of blind haters, neh? In fact, it's utterly crushing the game that came before!
Actually based on it's position after five years on the most played it is. Halo 3 was number one for two years straight then number two for another year after that. I don't see Reach at number two? Do you?
Because Halo: Reach is not only beating those same games that Halo 3 was beating, but it's beating Halo 3 now. This clearly means it's a better game.
Oh wow. I'm sorry for your loss. Your brain has seemed to have left you. I'm so sorry. So Reach is beating yet another five year old game. Not a very big accomplishment if you ask me. You're actually helping me prove my argument.
Logic pwned.
No. I think you just did that to yourself.
[Edited on 08.05.2012 7:08 PM PDT]