- the real Janaka
- |
- Exalted Heroic Member
Haters are going to hate.
Praisers are going to praise.
The Bungie Forums are what keeps my mind sharp and my fingers active, between writing my own movie scripts, drawing, and studying industrial design. At the moment I'm working on miniatures for a short movie that I'll hopefully be able to film once I've saved up for a camera... That's me, with the mug, trying to have a conversation with Konoko.
Spilling out vital story information through articles on random small sites is an interesting way of giving your fans details about an upcoming title.Posted by: ajw34307
I think it'd be a pretty good explanation for making the Didact an 'enemy', since humanity will obviously be keen to get this weapon when they're neither politically nor socially able to handle such a thing. It'd be a pretty big deal for the Didact too since he knows the Precursors are making their comeback soon.Another wise plan for the ONI to sink their teeth in?Posted by: TheSpiderChief
Not necessarily.
Halo: Reach didn't feature any Halo's (unless you count the one at the end).
Halo 3: ODST didn't feature any Halo's.
Halo Wars didn't feature any Halo's.
Halo is just a franchise name. It doesn't necessarily have to feature a Halo Ring in it to make it a Halo game.Notice how all the games you mentioned had an under title? (Halo wars is pretty much Halo: Wars). With that written, I do not believe that your point is valid. Halo is a title, yes, but it is it because the story--in the end--is about the Halo installations, just as much as Lord of the Rings is about a ring.
With Halo 4,5,6, being pure titles, I doubt this would change; I doubt 343i would be dumb enough (not often you see me write that) to completely diminish the Haloes worth by replacing them with another threat. Unless it is buildt on the same concept - a Precursor ringworld for instance.You know what Hotshot Revan II? I like your theory/idea^
[Edited on 08.06.2012 5:35 PM PDT]