Bungie.net Community
This topic has moved here: Subject: Looking for clarity in a forum rule.
  • Subject: Looking for clarity in a forum rule.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Looking for clarity in a forum rule.
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Destinypedia - The Wiki for Bungie's Destiny
Posted by: DEATHPIMP72
Anyone but Foman. He smells like cheese.

Posted by: ctjl96
EDIT: Yeah, see, Foman's saying "well, by the book it was alright to lock it" but at the same time if the Ninjas moderated by the book all the time, the site's discussion quality would be very poor.
Probably a different discussion for a different thread, but feel free to make that thread if you wish. I'll have fun ripping this silly argument to shreds.

  • 08.13.2012 3:58 PM PDT

*´¨)---––•(-• Dutchy •-)•–--–-(¨´*
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)••(¨*•.¸ (¨´*•.¸´•.¸
(¸.•´ (¸.•Everything fails•.¸) ´•.¸)


Posted by: Duardo
All those verses threads in The Flood would sorely be missed.
Posted by: ctjl96
EDIT: Yeah, see, Foman's saying "well, by the book it was alright to lock it" but at the same time if the Ninjas moderated by the book all the time, the site's discussion quality would be very poor.
I never see threads about verses. However, I do see versus threads often.

  • 08.13.2012 3:59 PM PDT

Whatever you say, but no matter how you put it, if Daddy was as strict as he tried to be, some of my favorite threads would have been locked.

  • 08.13.2012 4:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

SPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON!

Of course, then the loop-hole seeking nitpicking temporary literalism rears its ugly head.

Precisely why the rules are vague and "grey" in that regard.

  • 08.13.2012 4:03 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Exalted Unexplainable Member

No one's interested in saying what would happen in increasingly hypothetical situations. Besides, the rule doesn't matter, what matters is the meaning behind the rule, and Forum Ninjas are the hand selected interpreters of the Bungie.net rules. If you feel that a moderator is making a illogical decision, be it because of a poor rule, or his/her interpretation of the rule, you can always take it up with the higher authorities of this site.

Posted by: evilcam
Of course, then the loop-hole seeking nitpicking temporary literalism rears its ugly head.

Precisely why the rules are vague and "grey" in that regard.
Damn you for saying the same thing with less words! I'll post this anyway.

  • 08.13.2012 4:05 PM PDT

I thought they were grey because Bungie was trying not to be racist.

  • 08.13.2012 4:04 PM PDT

Posted by: Great_Pretender
Case and point: don't worry about it. Girls start getting boobies pretty soon, and then you'll have plenty of other things to think about. Being an Inheritor is not a life goal.
-TGP-

Posted by: Helveck
What if said, "Is it ok to state that I think the second amendment shouldn't exist?"

As opposed to, "This is why I think the second amendment shouldn't exist."

That's not even a discussion that the Flood could keep civil and you know it. It would simply be flamebait, if you want to discuss that then you should do it in a private group that allows it or on a different site that allows it.

  • 08.13.2012 4:15 PM PDT

Posted by: A Bit Of Zero
This thread would have appealed to me more if it was written with crayons.
Posted by: King Dutchy
I broke one of the cords for my X11s because I couldn't get past the final American course in Doritos Crash Course.

This thread should be locked for the discussion of political discussion.

  • 08.13.2012 4:18 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2