- Recon Number 54
- |
- Master Forum Ninja
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Well, here we are. I guess that it was destined to come to this.
Posted by: FatM
What, because I can follow a pattern of how moderators typically moderate, their opinions on specific issues, and the way they post gives me absolutely no right to make any judgement or lightly-assigned assumption on what measures they would take in specific situations?
So are we random, are we predictable, or are we biased? You're trying to have it at least 3 ways.
We are not identical, I admit that as a fact. We are consistent as possible to our own personal standards. That is at the request of our superiors. That means that we're not going to be identical, but we will try to be consistent individually.
Why is that a problem? If a rule is broken, why is the focus on the discipline (how much, why, to what extent, etc.) and not on the fact that someone intentionally violated the rules and knowingly "rolled the dice" when it came to the consequences?
So, what is it please?
Inconsistency? (I admit it, but call it personal differences and diversity)
Predictability of an individual? (I admit that, and call THAT consistency)
Bias? (The fact that I am not a clone of Foman, TU, Duardo, or any of my colleagues? Again, that's the cards we're dealt my friend)
Other than you're not happy (that much is clear) can you PLEASE explain what the problem is as you see it?