Black Ops 2 I run two accounts warmup only at 1.97kdr...real is at 3.77. i'm in master division 4 league play. pm 4 clan inv...must have 2.5 kdr or better
I started with Halo 2 in 2005, but my friend had Halo 2 at launch. Wasn't it like 5 melees or something retarded to get a kill?
Also, personally I hate hitscan so that's one of the reasons I prefer Halo 3. It would be nice to have a good netcode, but hitscan is a console crutch and completely unrealistic. Hitscan is just retarded IMO.
I mean projectiles takes more skill than Hitscan, but I would have supported a slightly tighter spread in H3. There's no point for spread at all in hitscan. Also, people don't realize how much autoaim these games have built into them. To me the real skill comes in the tactical jumps/shortcuts and knowledge. That's where Halo 3 thrives. Halo 3's maps are much more random if you will and because of this have a lot more variety in terms of lines of sight and directions of attack. Grenades are a huge skill in all the halo games and the only game that got that wrong was Reach.
Also, I've never seen bloodshots on LAN, but I suppose it's possible.
Posted by: iTz LiMeSoDa
Ok idk if this is what you're really talking about but I'm going to say in short what is not the best about Halo 3
It was the first real downfall of Halo skill-wise. Well, Halo 2 was, but after the patch (the one that created the button glitches and fixed melees and stuff) it became much much better. The main problem with the game is the net code and how it's not hitscan, and how the BR has a terribly inaccurate random spread. Even on LAN there's bloodshots sometimes. (recalling a specific incident in the '10 season when Puckett even commented on it saying "and about that shot that didn't register? Don't worry we're going to Reach next season".) But don't get me wrong Halo 3 is a great game and I think the positives outway the negatives vastly, and I think it's better than NBNS Reach.
[Edited on 09.04.2012 1:13 AM PDT]