Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?
  • Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?
Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

BTW... I just want to throw this out there.

Are the rest of you paying attention?

See this Sarge guy here?

Pay attention, because compared to this guy.. The rest of you are just worthless people adding an LOL at the end of a quote.
Nothing to say, nothing to add, nothing to contribute, nothing to argue.

I'm done for tonight Sarge.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:16 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:15 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
BTW... I just want to throw this out there.

Are the rest of you paying attention?

See this Sarge guy here?

Pay attention, because compared to this guy.. The rest of you are just worthless people adding an LOL at the end of a quote.


I'm done for tonight Sarge.


Whatever, come back with the right facts or dont come back at all.

  • 09.08.2012 12:16 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

You don't have fact's either..

Show me where BF3 has more PC players than console players.
Go ahead and back that one up. Cause I seriously doubt that many people could afford a PC to play that game, compared to the people who can afford to to play it on the console.

Oh, and don't forget to account for the fact that most console players still consider CoD superior to BF3.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:21 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:18 AM PDT

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Battlefield+3+pc+player+count

  • 09.08.2012 12:19 AM PDT

Join Halo Haven for all things related to Halo 4


Tell her that If you jingle my bells, Ill promise you a white Christmas - Call Me Venom
The world can't end next month. My yogurt expires in 2013 - Princess Cadence
If Apple invented a car, would it have windows? - Xxembers

"If you can't amaze people with your intelligence, confuse them with your bull -blam!-." - MR E0S

I'm surprised this is still going on. There are hardly any coherent thoughts in this thread.

This 'browser' business just isn't going to happen.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:20 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:19 AM PDT

There's always room for you, If you want to be my friend.

Mr.E0S, you know way too much.

  • 09.08.2012 12:21 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I did a google search for BF3 Console vs PC population and this is the first thing on googles list.

http://bf3blog.com/2011/11/battlefield-3-lead-platform-was-on -consoles-after-all/

Bye bye now.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:25 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:25 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
I did a google search for BF3 Console vs PC population and this is the first thing on googles list.

http://bf3blog.com/2011/11/battlefield-3-lead-platform-was-on -consoles-after-all/

Bye bye now.


Are you that lazy to search other places? Battlefield 3 for the first month had a larger population on pc then it did console. It has been going back and forth for awhile now.

But as you said i gave you a big title where there was a larger population on pc then there was console.

And none of this matters why because pc has the most exclusive titles out of all the platforms. So it doesnt really matter if call of duty has a larger population on console then pc because pc has exclusives that have their own large populations which outweigh console gamers.

Plus none of this relates to halo in any shape or form.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:30 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:27 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I did do some more searching, and every link I'm seeing is saying the same thing. It's the same message. BF3 Flopped on the PC compared to Console sales.

People asking question like? Why is BF3 doing so much better on consoles?

I don't know what you're searching. But just about EVERYTHING that is coming up for me, is telling me that BF3 sold more on consoles and ended up losing to MW3.

STOP! I want to leave damn you.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:32 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:31 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
I did do some more searching, and every link I'm seeing is saying the same thing. It's the same message. BF3 Flopped on the PC compared to Console sales.

People asking question like? Why is BF3 doing so much better on consoles?

I don't know what you're searching. But just about EVERYTHING that is coming up for me, is telling me that BF3 sold more on consoles and ended up losing to MW3.


You didnt ask about sales, you ask about population which bf3 at the begining had more players on pc then console. And now it is constantly going back and forth between the platforms.

Yes bf3 lost to modern warfare 3, but you wanted me to get a big title game and thats what i did.

I also bet that team fortress 2 has more pc players then console players.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:39 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:33 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Team Fortress 2 has MANY MANY REASONS for having more PC players. It's free on the PC.. for one.

It's got more OPTIONS on the PC.

Console TF2 doesn't have Steam Workshop backing it up.
TF2 Is actually well optimized to run on even a -blam!- PC setup.

So try again.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:51 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:48 AM PDT

Stop getting mad that i am disproving you. You said that if a game was on pc and console the console version ALWAYS has a large population. I have given you 3 examples which disproves that statement.

  • 09.08.2012 12:51 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

So, because BF3 had more population during the first month of relase on PC that's disproving me?

So because TF2 is free on the PC... that disproves me?

You haven't disproved -blam!-.

The only games that matter when it comes to comparing PC populations to Console populations is Halo and CoD and BF3. And guess what?

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:53 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:52 AM PDT

Now your just mad.

  • 09.08.2012 12:53 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
The only game that matter when it comes to comparing PC populations to Console populations is Halo and CoD and BF3. And guess what?


You have lost all credibility. Pc game are about their exclusives not what games they in common with consoles.

  • 09.08.2012 12:54 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

As a Hatter.

  • 09.08.2012 12:54 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Do I need to remind you of the most recent uproar over on CoD's end of the spectrum involving dedicated server support for the PC? The PC version of CoD was being Consolized and forced to feed from a matchmaking system. And why?

Because the population of PC was so small they didn't care to specifically cater to the PC gamers, they'd rather just port the -blam!- matchmaking service in it's entirety instead to save themselves the time.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 12:57 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:55 AM PDT

Remember what we arguing? Remember when you said that there are more console gamers then pc. You cant just cut out the hundreds of thousands of exclusive pc games that the majority of the pc population plays.

  • 09.08.2012 12:56 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Those PC exclusives still don't mean -blam!-. 100 people playing Trine on the PC has no business being compared to 100k people playing CoD.

I'm not going to compare all the people playing online poker.. to the populations of the 3 Biggest FPS games out.

The only games that matter in this conversation for comparison is HALO, COD, AND BF3. NO OTHER GAME MATTERS BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO SMALL AND INSIGNIFICANT TO EVEN BOTHER COMPARING!

Even Team Fortress 2, has no business being compared in this case. Because it is special in that it is not one of the big 3. IT is also so heavily specialized to provide a better experience for PC players that only an idiot would pay money for it to get it on the console.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:04 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 12:58 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
The only games that matter in this conversation for comparison is HALO, COD, AND BF3 NO OTHER GAME MATTERS BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO SMALL AND INSIGNIFICANT TO EVEN BOTHER COMPARING!


You yet again lost all credibility, there are hundreds of pc games that have large populations that we could use for comparison purposes. You are literally trying to avoid all the facts so you can create a scenario where your right even though the actual FACTS do not support your claim.

And NONE OF THIS changes the fact that this all started with you saying server browsers should be implemented into halo, which wouldn't work, just as the matchmaking system you despise doesn't work on pc.

So quit trying to shove your ideas down the throats of the community because

1. No will take you seriously
2. You act so immaturely that people cant stand you
3. Have no facts to support your ideas

What you should do

1. Be mature, dont curse, and pitch your idea with a nice tone
2. Have facts to support your claims otherwise you look like a fool

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:06 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:02 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Is it safe to say that I can at least cut out all the single player PC exclusives from this comparison? Because that's pretty much what your PC exclusives entails.. mostly single player games.

  • 09.08.2012 1:09 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
Is it safe to say that I can at least cut out all the single player PC exclusives from this comparison? Because that's pretty much what your PC exclusives entails.. mostly single player games.


No because you should be comparing all console players to all pc players, that is how you get the total which is accurate. In the end you would get more pc then console players.

  • 09.08.2012 1:10 AM PDT

I win, you lose, get over it!

Minecraft has more PC than Console

  • 09.08.2012 1:13 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Is Minecraft one of the 3 biggest FPS of recent history?
No?

Then it doesn't matter

WE are comparing the Populations of the 3 biggests FPS's. That is all. Why just those? Because they are the ones currently having the most influence on the industry and the direction it is going.

Obviously Halo loses immediately because they stopped porting to PC at Halo 2.

But what about CoD? Console wins

But what about BF3? CONSOLE WINS!.

What purpose does it serve to compare the 100 people Playing Space Pirates and Zombies to that? These are the games we are talking about.. the only ones that matter. The ones that are currently in the BIG SPOTLIGHT!

We only care about the population comparisons of these games. What part of that don't you understand?

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:19 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:16 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
Is Minecraft one of the 3 biggest FPS of recent?

Then it doesn't matter

WE are comparing the Populations of the 3 biggests FPS's. That is all.

Obviously Halo loses immediately because they stopped porting to PC at Halo 2.

But what about CoD. Console wins

But what about BF3. CONSOLE WINS!.

WHAT BUSINESS DOES COMPARING ANY OTHER GAME HAVE TO THESE? NONE. Because these are the games we are talking about.. the only ones that matter. The ones that are currently in the BIG SPOTLIGHT!


We are comparing the populations of pc and consoles, which you need to go through much more than the top 3 fps to get an accurate reading of.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:18 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:17 AM PDT