Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?
  • Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?
Subject: Halo: Reach and Halo 4......whats the fuss about?

I win, you lose, get over it!


Posted by: MR E0S
Is Minecraft one of the 3 biggest FPS of recent?

Then it doesn't matter

WE are comparing the Populations of the 3 biggests FPS's. That is all.

Obviously Halo loses immediately because they stopped porting to PC at Halo 2.

But what about CoD. Console wins

But what about BF3. CONSOLE WINS!.

WHAT BUSINESS DOES COMPARING ANY OTHER GAME HAVE TO THESE? NONE. Because these are the games we are talking about.. the only ones that matter. The ones that are currently in the BIG SPOTLIGHT!


Wouldn't that make the comparison biased, since the list of PC Vs. Games is being restricted? All PC/Console Games should be included. Last time I saw, Minecraft is quite popular right now.

  • 09.08.2012 1:20 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
We only care about the population comparisons of these games. What part of that don't you understand?


Uh no, you brought up that there were more console gamers then pc and you are now trying to change topic to the populations of the top 3 fps because you know im right.

  • 09.08.2012 1:21 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

No you don't.

All you have to realize is this

CoD on console drew more population that CoD on PC. This in turn influences CoD developers to spend less time catering to PC players, and forcing PC players to put up with consolitus.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT PART?

In this case, we only care about CoD.. No other games population numbers matter in this instance. Because when they made the decision to remove dedicated server support. They weren't looking at every other game people might be playing on the PC. They only looked at the recent population numbers of THEIR GAME! and they used those numbers to make a decision to -blam!- over PC gamers.

There is no point in accounting for anything beyond the actual games in question when talking about population numbers.

When comparing population numbers of CoD console PLayers vs Cod PC players. WoW doesn't belong in that comparison!

WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU -blam!- UNDERSTAND?

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:25 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:22 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
No you don't.

All you have to realize is this

CoD on console drew more population that CoD on PC. This in turn influences CoD developers to spend less time catering to PC players, and forcing PC players to put up with consolitus.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT PART?

In this case, we only care about CoD.. No other games population numbers matter in this instance. Because when they made the decision to remove dedicated server support. They weren't looking at every other game people might be playing on the PC. They only looked at the recent population numbers of THEIR GAME! and they used those numbers to make a decision to -blam!- over PC gamers.

So again.. WTF do you think that you need to account for everyone playing facebook apps?


Who cares about the multiconsole games on the pc. If you are mainly playing pc to play multiconsole games you deserved to get slapped. Pc has always revolved around exclusive content.

Im also more concerned with the fact that you play cod on pc, every body knows that it is better on console.



[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:24 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:24 AM PDT

I win, you lose, get over it!


Posted by: MR E0S
No you don't.

All you have to realize is this

CoD on console drew more population that CoD on PC. This in turn influences CoD developers to spend less time catering to PC players, and forcing PC players to put up with consolitus.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT PART?

In this case, we only care about CoD.. No other games population numbers matter in this instance. Because when they made the decision to remove dedicated server support. They weren't looking at every other game people might be playing on the PC. They only looked at the recent population numbers of THEIR GAME! and they used those numbers to make a decision to -blam!- over PC gamers.

So again.. WTF do you think that you need to account for everyone playing facebook apps? Cause they certainly don't give a -blam!-.


Is MineCraft a FaceBook App?

You appear to constantly change your reasoning each time you are unable to offer a legitimate response.

  • 09.08.2012 1:24 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

If I'm comparing the population of CoD PC players vs CoD Console players....

WTF would I care about how many people are playing World of Warcraft?

You're -blam!- mentally retarded.. Shutup.

When you make population comparisons.. keep it relative to the title in question.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:27 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:26 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
That's not true. The amount of people who take consoles as seriously as those who takes PC that seriously..... The console outnumbers it by a long shot.


That is what you said which brought on the total amount of pc gamers vs the total amount of console gamers argument.

As i said before, if you are mainly playing multiconsole games on the pc you deserved to get slapped.

And who cares about call of duty the game sucks regardless of it being on pc and console.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 1:31 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:28 AM PDT

I win, you lose, get over it!


Posted by: MR E0S
If I'm comparing the population of CoD PC players vs CoD Console players....

WTF would I care about how many people are playing World of Warcraft?

You're -blam!- mentally retarded.. Shutup.


Then your whole PC Gamers Vs. Console Gamers is completely biased.

You said yourself the requirements of a PC Gamer and yet don't include non-FPS games in your logic.

  • 09.08.2012 1:28 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Do you even remember why the population argument came up in the first place? If you have no grasp of the context of why we are talking about population .. then get lost. Because Minecraft is a perfect example of something that has no business being included in this argument.

TL:DR
Halo 2 was riding the succes of Halo 1, and pushed this peice of -blam!- matchmaking service on us. Most people overlooked it because...it was HALO!

PC's have been using Server Browsers. A superior method.

More people can afford consoles for FPS games like Halo and CoD fixes. So developers somehow view that as matchmaking being a better method.

But if Halo 2 had never dropped on us with matchmaking and instead came with a server browser. And let some other FPS introduce matchmaking instead... It would be an entirely different multiplayer landscape today. A Better one.

The only bearing population has on this is the fact that consoles sell more for the big 3. Which in turns influence the way they are starting to treat PC players on the ports. IE. Call of Duty removing dedicated server support.

Hello?

FPS on consoles sell more because its cheaper.. Not because it's matchmaking service is better.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:03 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:52 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
Do you even remember why the population argument came up in the first place? If you have no grasp of the context of why we are talking about population .. then get lost. Because Minecraft is a perfect example of something that has no business being included in this argument.


You literally dont remember what we were arguing about.

Take your own advice and get lost because you clearly have no clue what you said and what we were arguing.

Go back to page 7 to reference.

No, just no, we were arguing if there were more pc gamers then console gamers, those games like cod have little impact because you must include ALL pc and console games and gamers not just 3 popular shooters.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:01 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 1:55 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I fully understand the argument still.. moron. Apparently you don't know how to read.

I was telling the 3rd wheel who joined us and tried to add minecraft into the argument to get lost.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:05 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:01 AM PDT

Posted by: MR E0S
I fully undestand the argument still.. moron. Apparently you don't know how to read.

I was telling the 3rd wheel who joined us to get lost.


He isnt a moron, he was just supporting the fact that when you said that when there is a console and pc version of a game that the console will always have more people on it which is fals. As another example he listed minecraft.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:03 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:03 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

You really don't know how to read.. I didn't call him the moron. I called you a moron.

Also, maybe I should have been more specific, When I was mentioning consoles always having more population numbers. I was SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO FPS GAMES You know, Halo... CoD, BF3.

Next time, I'll be sure to be more specific about it so I don't have to waste 3 pages trying to reel you back in to a realistic comparison.

Because what on earth makes you think that I care about any population numbers other than those related to THIS GAME?

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:08 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:04 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
You really don't know how to read.. I didn't call him the moron. I called you a moron.


Awww how cute insulting me again because you've lost another argument how sad.

  • 09.08.2012 2:06 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S
You really don't know how to read.. I didn't call him the moron. I called you a moron.

Also, maybe I should have been more specific, When I was mention consoles always having more population numbers. I was SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO FPS GAMES You know, Halo... CoD, BF3.

Next time, I'll be sure to be more specific about it so I don't have to waste 3 pages trying to reel you back in to a realistic comparison.


In that situation you would be correct, the thing is that isnt what you said. Next time say what you mean.

  • 09.08.2012 2:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

No, next time, use your -blam!- brain to keep the comparison realistic to the topic at hand. Anyone with half a brain would easly know, that the only comparison that mattered for the topic were the 3 titles I keep mentioning.

[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:11 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:10 AM PDT

You didnt even stay on topic go back to page 7 and read it closely.

Right around page 8 is when you brought up cod and how it was being consilized even though call of duty is created and designed for consoles first. And always has support for consoles first, call of duty is a console game at heart and not even worthy to be a pc game.



[Edited on 09.08.2012 2:13 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

I always stay on topic.

  • 09.08.2012 2:11 AM PDT


Posted by: MR E0S

Lol

Your the one that changed the topic from the population of pc gamers and console gamers to the populations of battlefield 3, call of duty, and halo console and pc counterparts.

I already addressed on page 7 that call of duty will have a larger console population then pc. And earlier i told you that call of duty is console game at heart and doesnt deserve to be on pc. Lastly call of duty has barley any influence on what developers do.

If a developer wants a matchmaking system that is their choice. Whether they make it good or not is completely up to them. It has nothing to do with call of duty. You the consumer can either buy their product or not that is really the only say you have because most developers dont care about their community.

So stop trying convince people to embrace your ideas because

1. They wont, your mean(even your very first forum post was mean and insulting), immature, and you dont posses a shred of intelligence
2. The developer doesn't really care about what the community wants as long as the solution is quick and simple they will do it,(example: tu update) vs complete overhaul of the custom game and multiplayer system which requires a lot of time, effort, and most important money
3. Complain on the actual developer website but do it nicely so you dont get banned





[Edited on 09.08.2012 3:33 AM PDT]

  • 09.08.2012 2:13 AM PDT

Join Halo Haven for all things related to Halo 4


Tell her that If you jingle my bells, Ill promise you a white Christmas - Call Me Venom
The world can't end next month. My yogurt expires in 2013 - Princess Cadence
If Apple invented a car, would it have windows? - Xxembers


Posted by: MR E0S
I always stay on topic.


sig'd

  • 09.08.2012 3:51 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

@OP

They're both terrible, that's what the "fuss" is about.

  • 09.08.2012 3:59 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

It's been quite a while..

oh reach forum you never disappoint me

  • 09.08.2012 5:09 AM PDT

"To me, a nice triple kill with the sniper is infinitely more impressive than any Living Dead Killionaire"

Does flaming people on forums count as an esport?

I'm a commendation/achievement/statistics freak.

-David (Drake)

You know what I just realized guys? E0S can't spell. He also can't use the English language in it's normal manner to illustrate his point, so he resorts to using CAPS LOCK.

"DON'T YOU SEE WHAT I MEAN????"

  • 09.08.2012 11:47 AM PDT

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
Goat was famous. Irie was infamous. Gh0st was FaMaS.

My stats in Halol 4

Typical Waypoint post.
no it's "its got to go" you wouldn't say the "it is got to go" would you?

long ass posts on the reach forum about population

still sucks at the game

lol

  • 09.08.2012 11:50 AM PDT
  • gamertag: MR E0S
  • user homepage:

Halo: Reach is the beginning of a new age for gaming.
It proves that developers can get away with punishing their players instead of fixing their game....and yet the fanboys will still sing praises to them.

-blam!- all of you fanboys!

Yep...I suck at the game..

Oooh.. what a zinger!

Next time, make an interesting reply. Yes?

  • 09.08.2012 1:15 PM PDT