Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Delete please, for the sake of my intelligence....
  • Subject: Delete please, for the sake of my intelligence....
Subject: Delete please, for the sake of my intelligence....
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

**Like...ZOMG! Delete this thread please!!**

Vitamin explained why the AR is a wanted weapon, but as soon as he flamed the SMG, I lost interest in everything he said...

SMG 0WNZ j00!!!

*Also, another criticism post coming soon from yours truly!*

[Edited on 6/23/2006]

  • 06.23.2006 7:38 PM PDT
Subject: Why IS the AR so great?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

no one has ever said anything about the AR being better than anything. In fact, most people would agree that the BR is better than the AR. The AR was just really fun to use. That's why most people want it back.

EDIT: Plus, having the word "Goddam" in your sig 5 times with only 2 sentances could get you banned...and makes you sound like a jackass.

[Edited on 6/23/2006]

  • 06.23.2006 7:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Why did you have to make a new topic about this?

  • 06.23.2006 7:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

THe SMG smokes @$$ it suck the AR is awesome Duh!!! duh !!! duh !!! tsh

  • 06.23.2006 7:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Its a cool weapon,but I never really used it much in Halo CE. I don't know why everyone is going crazy over it...Its just an AR like every other FPS has...

EDIT: If you want this post deleted you might wanna edit your post as well...

[Edited on 6/23/2006]

  • 06.23.2006 7:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.

  • 06.23.2006 7:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H SNg i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!

  • 06.23.2006 7:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H S/\/\g i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!


lol

  • 06.23.2006 7:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H SNg i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!
Hm? Actually, I did not describe the word SMG in my post. If I were going to do THAT, I would have used the following words and phrases:
Peashooter, gun that does not lose accuracy when you hold down the trigger, gun that sucks against weak enemy crowds, gun that sucks against a single strong opponent, etc.

Nope. What I described to you is a genuine assault rifle. Looks like you're another person who can't handle the truth. Ah well. Your loss.

EDIT: Gman, I edited for ya, ole buddy! If you noticed, I changed virtually nothing about this post, except for the addition of these few sentences.

Only for you, pal!

[Edited on 6/23/2006]

  • 06.23.2006 7:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

To feel familiar with the game? idk.....its just a giant SMG.....I think the AR holds more bullets than a single SMG. Also, it has a longer range to it, i think. What i think bungie should do is have the AR kill someone very easily (3, 4 bullets) when they have no shields :)

  • 06.23.2006 7:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H SNg i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!
Hm? Actually, I did not describe the word SMG in my post. If I were going to do THAT, I would have used the following words and phrases:
Peashooter, gun that does not lose accuracy when you hold down the trigger, gun that sucks against weak enemy crowds, gun that sucks against a single strong opponent, etc.

Nope. What I described to you is a genuine assault rifle. Looks like you're another person who can't handle the truth. Ah well. Your loss.


Lol. I'm not even going to try to argue. Your sooooo right!

  • 06.23.2006 7:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

what i dont like about having the smg is that we have thta now....and im supposed to beleive that in 500 years were still using it? psh. i bet in reality humans will not be using projectiles in 500 years. (that is if were not extinct)

  • 06.23.2006 7:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H SNg i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!
Hm? Actually, I did not describe the word SMG in my post. If I were going to do THAT, I would have used the following words and phrases:
Peashooter, gun that does not lose accuracy when you hold down the trigger, gun that sucks against weak enemy crowds, gun that sucks against a single strong opponent, etc.

Nope. What I described to you is a genuine assault rifle. Looks like you're another person who can't handle the truth. Ah well. Your loss.


Lol. I'm not even going to try to argue. Your sooooo right!


XD...
You make me feel like an idiot. I take this way too seriously. I'm gonna edit my post above. Sometimes I just act like the same people I criticize...

  • 06.23.2006 7:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
Posted by: Gman6285
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
The AR was great because it was a trusty weapon. Much like a little grunt's trusty popgun, the plasma pistol. ^_^

It was cool because it served two purposes: A) Mow down a large group of weak opponents or B) mow down a single strong opponent. At point blank, you could spray down an enemy with it. But at medium range, the bullets would spread much more, so they could kill any weak enemies that were kinda spread out. As a skilled combo, you could throw a grenade into an enemy crowd, and then stand back and use the AR.

Then again, the AR has its weaknesses; its bullets did low damage unless you happened to be right in front of someone. The bullets also lose accuracy if you hold down the trigger long enough. So it was a good, balanced weapon.


What did you just describe here? The SMG....Oh wait now I'm going to get flamed by all the fan boys saying Z0mG 73H SNg i5 n07hin LiK3 DeH aR!!!shift1!!
Hm? Actually, I did not describe the word SMG in my post. If I were going to do THAT, I would have used the following words and phrases:
Peashooter, gun that does not lose accuracy when you hold down the trigger, gun that sucks against weak enemy crowds, gun that sucks against a single strong opponent, etc.

Nope. What I described to you is a genuine assault rifle. Looks like you're another person who can't handle the truth. Ah well. Your loss.


Lol. I'm not even going to try to argue. Your sooooo right!


XD...
You make me feel like an idiot. I take this way too seriously. I'm gonna edit my post above. Sometimes I just act like the same people I criticize...


No, I'm not trying to make you look like an idiot. I chose not to argue because I'm tired of argueing over the same subject hundreds of times. Even then, in the end we would both still think the other is wrong so whats the point?

  • 06.23.2006 8:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I just have to say this- I love everyone here right now. *hugs everyone*

  • 06.23.2006 8:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

That is a good point...I guess it's like a never-ending debate.

  • 06.23.2006 8:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: geyah ho
ok 3-4 is way to few with no shields, the AR has less range, and holds the same amount of bullets as the SMG


wow. never knew, but i think the AR may be more accurate if you tap the trigger. so maybe 2-3 hits would be fine. Other than that Bungie must have had the smgs to replace the AR, i dont know what they are gonna do now. Lay off the drugs bungie.

  • 06.23.2006 8:05 PM PDT
Subject: Delete please, for the sake of my intelligence....
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I cant expect someone who doesnt appreciate nostalgia to like the Ar i guess.

the Ar was the go-to gun in halo 1. it was essentially a slightly stronger version of the smg, but it was big, loud, and fun as hell to use.

the smg on the other hand, is weaker, sounds less awesome, and is less fun to use unless you dual wield them.

SMG's are awesome, but the Ar is more awesome, plain and simple.

  • 06.23.2006 8:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: FinalSonicX
I cant expect someone who doesnt appreciate nostalgia to like the Ar i guess.

the Ar was the go-to gun in halo 1. it was essentially a slightly stronger version of the smg, but it was big, loud, and fun as hell to use.

the smg on the other hand, is weaker, sounds less awesome, and is less fun to use unless you dual wield them.

SMG's are awesome, but the Ar is more awesome, plain and simple.


Hehe I do agree with that. I loved the loud bang the AR made. Was it the best gun no. Do I want it back? Not really, but it was fun to use when I had to use it.

  • 06.23.2006 8:10 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: FinalSonicX
I cant expect someone who doesnt appreciate nostalgia to like the Ar i guess.

the Ar was the go-to gun in halo 1. it was essentially a slightly stronger version of the smg, but it was big, loud, and fun as hell to use.

the smg on the other hand, is weaker, sounds less awesome, and is less fun to use unless you dual wield them.

SMG's are awesome, but the Ar is more awesome, plain and simple.


Once again I agree :)

[Edited on 6/23/2006]

  • 06.23.2006 8:12 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I believe that Halo CE had the AR and Pistol, Halo 2 had the BR and SMG, Halo 3 will have the modified AR and other cool weapons that Bungie will decide on, so please stop asking for them to come back, because they won't and stop talking about them, especially in the Halo 3 forum. Throw this into the Halo 2 forum or something, or in the weapons idea thread, where its supposed to be.

  • 06.23.2006 8:18 PM PDT