www.bungie.net | halo.bungie.net | bungiestore.com
Tribute To The Arbiter My Halo Story The G4 Military . Quoted from prophate---So please, for the sake of humanity...the next time you have a thought...kill yourself. lol!!!!!!
I don't see why not, you can lift a tank you soud be able to hold three wepons. It's Kinda nice to think you could hold a sniper rifle, rocket, and A BR, but the balance of the game could be thrown of wack.
No, 2 was done for a reason. I'm not sure why, but it keeps it from being like Unreal where you can have as many as you want.Did we forget dual weilding? That makes 3 weapons...[Edited on 6/24/2006]
where would you hold it? ductape it to your head? get real!
...And so the hero crawled through the fissure on the surface of Tyr. There, the lone Dwarf stared into the cold, dark eyes of Soulblighter...The fiend hefted his blade over his shoulder as a flock of raven took upon his form...-TBG-
Mabey if you could carry a weak pistol as a third side arm
Posted by: Still, there were some times when I had to leave a fuel rod gun, cause I didn't want to give up my Bruteshot or carbine...I wish you could put guns on the seat of the Warthog or something, then you wouldn't have to run halfway across the map to go and get that one sniper again...
The Frozen Minority - The most infamous clan borne from the Seventh Column.
No. The reason most games now only allow two weapons is because of balance. Instead of carrying every gun for every situation, you have to make decisions, plan your advance and make sacrifices.Balance > 0Mg WAOH factor.
NO for my reason- Jackass on team has sniper+rocket+sword, o that really fun for everyone
Posted by: Timanthawhere would you hold it? ductape it to your head? get real!HAHA
It would be like in that one DieHard movie where he tapes the pistol to his back. Except MC might have a hard time reaching around to his back. Damn those ripped muscles.
“We are the Mirratord. We strike with speed and stealth. Our enemies will not see their deaths. They will not know their fate. In darkness, we will see light. In light, we will see darkness. No matter the location, we will see victory. If we fail, no one will know. Like a ghost, our presence is a mystery. For the honor of the Mirratord" Join the Mirratord here
three weapons would be good if two of them would have to be the weaker dual weild weapons, like being able to switch from br to Plasma Rifle SMG combo and back without dropping one no ability to carry sniper/rockets/sword thats -blam!- and superweapon whorage
no cos it would be -blam!- trying to kill someone with a Sword, BR and Rifle
conceal it in your -blam!-...
MTV is to music as KFC is to chicken.MySpaceDon't like something I post? Please call my complaint department at 1-800-IDC-STFU.100% of signature statistics are fake. If you put this in your sig I'll sue you for copyright infringement.Thats not a statistic btw, thats a FACT.
2 is a good number. It forces you to make decisions in terms of tactics without making it impossible to do so (as in 1 gun)
lol why bring this up? dumb question or woteva
bad question. totally complicated, you'd have to cycle through one other weapon to reach the one you want, which could end up with you being dead.
No, they should keep the limit at two.
Its 2 for a reason. If your in a battle you know exactly what your gonna switch to with 2 guns. If your in battle and you switch to your other weapon you know what it is and squeese R before you even see the gun. With 3 you might use the wrong gun and accidentally waste your ammo for it or if its a rocket launcher or something like that you might even kill yourself.