Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: 40k vs Halo
  • Subject: 40k vs Halo
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: 40k vs Halo
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Five exclamations marks are a good signifier of an insane mind. As is trying to hide from Death in an airtight room. Silly wizard.

There hasn't been a good Vs thread here, so here we go.

All factions are their peak, and all factions from the same universe work together. Who would win?

  • 09.27.2012 12:35 PM PDT

"Find where the liar hides, so that I may place my boot between his gums!" - Rtas 'Vadum

40k stomps. And it stomps really hard.

  • 09.27.2012 12:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.

This thread again? There is a group for this, you know.

Either way, 40k wins. The Imperium at it's peak (Dark Age) had Black Hole guns, time guns, armies of soldiers, continent sized warships and planet destroying weaponry. I have quotes for the first two, the other may take a bit of digging to find.

Eventually, people will say 'Halo rings will fire and kill the enemies' but they are wrong. Three factions have precognitive powers with the Necrons having predicted the Tyranids 65 million years in advance. People will probably bring up the Precursors and their structures made from the living universe but a) 40k has the living universe too and b) Necrons used the life of the Universe as WMDs. The Hive Fleets we see in contemporary 40k are just splinter fleets from the first, true Hive Fleet. Finally, the C'tan are explicitly stated as having unlimited power in the material realm with their imagination as their sole handicap.

  • 09.27.2012 12:58 PM PDT

In the Gaming world they call me The Prodigy. My guess is because I spent my time helping every person with every problem rather they where my enemies or not. With that said I also ended up blowing the minds of everyone I met online. And in the real world if we are talking about Game development and computer skill. None the less I tend to present my self in a generally professional manner and I do not tolerate an annoying degree of Disrespect or high levels of ignorance.

Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?

  • 09.27.2012 1:12 PM PDT

Online Gaming's pretty much like a zombie movie. There are a lot of mindless idiots roaming around but you find some survivors on the way.
My YouTube channel
If you're interested in vs threads, here's a sweet little group for you to join


Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.

[Edited on 09.27.2012 1:46 PM PDT]

  • 09.27.2012 1:28 PM PDT

http://www.capturemyhaloclips.com/ - Get your Halo clips captured.
The Artists Corner - Show other members your artistic talent.
Storywrite - Where I am writing my book.

I know nothing of 40K so my answer would be biased therefore I'm not giving an answer.

  • 09.27.2012 1:32 PM PDT

In the Gaming world they call me The Prodigy. My guess is because I spent my time helping every person with every problem rather they where my enemies or not. With that said I also ended up blowing the minds of everyone I met online. And in the real world if we are talking about Game development and computer skill. None the less I tend to present my self in a generally professional manner and I do not tolerate an annoying degree of Disrespect or high levels of ignorance.



Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically just means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.


Yes I am indeed a fanboy of Halo when it comes down to it there is not much that I don't know about it's universe. Though yes unless the chief went completely beast mode and got lucky beyond any luck that has ever existed then yes 40K would win.

  • 09.27.2012 1:43 PM PDT


Posted by: BIOHAZRED


Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically just means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.


Yes I am indeed a fanboy of Halo when it comes down to it there is not much that I don't know about it's universe. Though yes unless the chief went completely beast mode and got lucky beyond any luck that has ever existed then yes 40K would win.


A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

  • 09.27.2012 1:56 PM PDT

In the Gaming world they call me The Prodigy. My guess is because I spent my time helping every person with every problem rather they where my enemies or not. With that said I also ended up blowing the minds of everyone I met online. And in the real world if we are talking about Game development and computer skill. None the less I tend to present my self in a generally professional manner and I do not tolerate an annoying degree of Disrespect or high levels of ignorance.

What about Those guys from dedliest warrior. They have a computer that can calculate the results of this epic battle.. I wonder if it is possible to contact then about that. Though I figure that both 40K and. Bungie/343i would have to agree to it. None the less it would be awesome.

[Edited on 09.27.2012 3:54 PM PDT]

  • 09.27.2012 2:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

You are forgetting the C'tan. They are flat out stated to have complete power in the material universe and are part of the fundamental forces of reality. The Necrons harnessed the power of the living universe to make WMDs. The Men of Gold were able to create a dark matter gun that created black holes on a whim and chrono-weaponry that shifted a target a nanosecond into the past causing it to destroy itself. Nurgle isn't chained just to decay, the Flood are right up in Nurgle's sphere of influence.

  • 09.27.2012 2:43 PM PDT

Halo wins because of it's art direction. 40k has some of worst art I've ever seen and it always surprises me how it doesn't bother hard-core fans.

Not being a 40k fan I have to say some of the tech mentioned above does sound bad-ass!

  • 09.27.2012 2:59 PM PDT


Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

You are forgetting the C'tan. They are flat out stated to have complete power in the material universe and are part of the fundamental forces of reality. The Necrons harnessed the power of the living universe to make WMDs. The Men of Gold were able to create a dark matter gun that created black holes on a whim and chrono-weaponry that shifted a target a nanosecond into the past causing it to destroy itself. Nurgle isn't chained just to decay, the Flood are right up in Nurgle's sphere of influence.


My point in the end though is you have two groups of immortal, god-like beings that are both expressly stated to be undeatable by anything other than something unique to their universe fighting each other. Saying that one wold win over the other is simply to announce your status as a fan of that universe. The Nurgle thing was more of a passing thought, a musing on what would happen if the rules of the two universes were combined, which I don't necessarily assume to be true.

  • 09.27.2012 3:03 PM PDT

Haters are going to hate.
Praisers are going to praise.

The Bungie Forums are what keeps my mind sharp and my fingers active, between writing my own movie scripts, drawing, and studying industrial design. At the moment I'm working on miniatures for a short movie that I'll hopefully be able to film once I've saved up for a camera... That's me, with the mug, trying to have a conversation with Konoko.

I know not much about the 40K universe, other than it being described as exaggeration itself.. So I'm curious, what would their equivalent to the Halo Array be?
Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.
No, luck means geas, before the Forerunner trilogy. The Iris viral hints at this.

[Edited on 09.27.2012 3:12 PM PDT]

  • 09.27.2012 3:09 PM PDT


Posted by: the real Janaka
I know not much about the 40K universe, other than it being described as exaggeration itself.. So I'm curious, what would their equivalent to the Halo Array be?
Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.
No, luck means geas, before the Forerunner trilogy. The Iris viral hints at this.


I'm not aware of any one single galaxy killer in the 40K verse, but I do know that pretty much every faction has been known to toss worlds in the trash on a regular basis.

If the Rings were used, then the Orks, local Tyranids, Imperium, both Eldar factions, material chaos forces and the Tau would be obliterated (along with any of the sub races). That's leaving the Necrons (machines), the extragalactic 'Nids and the rest of Chaos.

I may be forgetting a few though...

  • 09.27.2012 3:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

You are forgetting the C'tan. They are flat out stated to have complete power in the material universe and are part of the fundamental forces of reality. The Necrons harnessed the power of the living universe to make WMDs. The Men of Gold were able to create a dark matter gun that created black holes on a whim and chrono-weaponry that shifted a target a nanosecond into the past causing it to destroy itself. Nurgle isn't chained just to decay, the Flood are right up in Nurgle's sphere of influence.


My point in the end though is you have two groups of immortal, god-like beings that are both expressly stated to be undeatable by anything other than something unique to their universe fighting each other. Saying that one wold win over the other is simply to announce your status as a fan of that universe. The Nurgle thing was more of a passing thought, a musing on what would happen if the rules of the two universes were combined, which I don't necessarily assume to be true.

A fair point. I personally think that Precursors should not be included because all we know of them is that they are old, good at genetics, build nice structures, and have a connection with the Flood. I'm saying 40k would win not just because I am a fan but because the Precursors are connected to the living universe and 40k has the living universe trope too and has often demonstrated that it is manipulated.


Posted by: YakZSmelk
Halo wins because of it's art direction. 40k has some of worst art I've ever seen and it always surprises me how it doesn't bother hard-core fans.

Not being a 40k fan I have to say some of the tech mentioned above does sound bad-ass!

Really? 40k has some amazing artwork with BL producing some stunning wallpapers and covers. If I could, I would link you the pic of Holy Terra in the main book which is just filled with great pieces.

  • 09.27.2012 3:20 PM PDT


Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

You are forgetting the C'tan. They are flat out stated to have complete power in the material universe and are part of the fundamental forces of reality. The Necrons harnessed the power of the living universe to make WMDs. The Men of Gold were able to create a dark matter gun that created black holes on a whim and chrono-weaponry that shifted a target a nanosecond into the past causing it to destroy itself. Nurgle isn't chained just to decay, the Flood are right up in Nurgle's sphere of influence.


My point in the end though is you have two groups of immortal, god-like beings that are both expressly stated to be undeatable by anything other than something unique to their universe fighting each other. Saying that one wold win over the other is simply to announce your status as a fan of that universe. The Nurgle thing was more of a passing thought, a musing on what would happen if the rules of the two universes were combined, which I don't necessarily assume to be true.

A fair point. I personally think that Precursors should not be included because all we know of them is that they are old, good at genetics, build nice structures, and have a connection with the Flood. I'm saying 40k would win not just because I am a fan but because the Precursors are connected to the living universe and 40k has the living universe trope too and has often demonstrated that it is manipulated.




I know, but that starts to break down when you get into the specifics of how each universe works and relates. And then even the pre-established canon quite clearly stating that nothing can break a Precursor structure other than a Halo, and by extension, any other Precursor-made weaponry/technology, which can evidently be used only by a Precursor. As soon as you suggest something else killing them off you violate canon in some way.

Same notion for the Chaos gods and deamons. Only thing that can defeat them is the Emperor, the god of order. Discussing how the Precursors would relate in might to the Chaos gods is as pointless as trying to comprehend Cthulu or any of his ilk. The word incomprehensible exists for a reason.

  • 09.27.2012 3:29 PM PDT

Haters are going to hate.
Praisers are going to praise.

The Bungie Forums are what keeps my mind sharp and my fingers active, between writing my own movie scripts, drawing, and studying industrial design. At the moment I'm working on miniatures for a short movie that I'll hopefully be able to film once I've saved up for a camera... That's me, with the mug, trying to have a conversation with Konoko.

^Ah, but what about the Forerunners presumably having defeated the Precursors (the flood still lingers on)? Wouldn't that mean that they in fact can be defeated by a power less advanced than themselves? How would that translate to the 40K universe; are there instances where the less advanced win because of something?

[Edited on 09.27.2012 3:57 PM PDT]

  • 09.27.2012 3:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Do not waste your tears, I was not born to watch the world grow dim. Life is not measured in years, but by the deeds of men.

Posted by: goldhawk
We should know better, because we are better.


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Xd00999

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).

You are forgetting the C'tan. They are flat out stated to have complete power in the material universe and are part of the fundamental forces of reality. The Necrons harnessed the power of the living universe to make WMDs. The Men of Gold were able to create a dark matter gun that created black holes on a whim and chrono-weaponry that shifted a target a nanosecond into the past causing it to destroy itself. Nurgle isn't chained just to decay, the Flood are right up in Nurgle's sphere of influence.


My point in the end though is you have two groups of immortal, god-like beings that are both expressly stated to be undeatable by anything other than something unique to their universe fighting each other. Saying that one wold win over the other is simply to announce your status as a fan of that universe. The Nurgle thing was more of a passing thought, a musing on what would happen if the rules of the two universes were combined, which I don't necessarily assume to be true.

A fair point. I personally think that Precursors should not be included because all we know of them is that they are old, good at genetics, build nice structures, and have a connection with the Flood. I'm saying 40k would win not just because I am a fan but because the Precursors are connected to the living universe and 40k has the living universe trope too and has often demonstrated that it is manipulated.




I know, but that starts to break down when you get into the specifics of how each universe works and relates. And then even the pre-established canon quite clearly stating that nothing can break a Precursor structure other than a Halo, and by extension, any other Precursor-made weaponry/technology, which can evidently be used only by a Precursor. As soon as you suggest something else killing them off you violate canon in some way.

Same notion for the Chaos gods and deamons. Only thing that can defeat them is the Emperor, the god of order. Discussing how the Precursors would relate in might to the Chaos gods is as pointless as trying to comprehend Cthulu or any of his ilk. The word incomprehensible exists for a reason.

A good point, but when has Precursor weaponry ever been touched on? Where did you get Big E being the god of order as well? I have never heard of that outside of some fan theories.

@Janaka: To answer your earlier question, the equivalent of a Galaxy busting weapon would be the Celestial Orrey. It is a hollow planet controlled by the Necrons. Inside it is a map of the galaxy with every star represented. By snuffing out the star in the galaxy map the associated star in the Milky Way would go supernova. The reason it is not used more often is because the resident Necrons are worried that it may be abused and are trying to protect it from several other groups.

To answer your current question; the Orks are arguably the least technologically advanced species on the map currently, but they regularily win because of their absolutely astounding numbers, toughness, reproduction, and their ability to warp reality to a minor degree (such as making vehicles painted red go faster even if the same vehicle could not normally reach that speed).

[Edited on 09.27.2012 4:43 PM PDT]

  • 09.27.2012 4:41 PM PDT

Haters are going to hate.
Praisers are going to praise.

The Bungie Forums are what keeps my mind sharp and my fingers active, between writing my own movie scripts, drawing, and studying industrial design. At the moment I'm working on miniatures for a short movie that I'll hopefully be able to film once I've saved up for a camera... That's me, with the mug, trying to have a conversation with Konoko.

@Xd00999
Thanks. That Celestial Orrey sounds pretty awesome, and when I think of it, so does a lot of stuff from that universe. My only peoblem with it--as of now--is that most object/plot devices seem to be created and inserted just for the sake of them being cool (bad ass, awesome, etc). But that's just cause I don't know how they correspond to one another. I'll have to read the wiki page on that Orrey, really curious to see if there's an explanation of how it works (in terms of its fictions logic).

  • 09.27.2012 4:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Op, u have to know 1 thing.
The only universe i know that can defeat 40k is the one with downseekers

  • 09.28.2012 4:17 AM PDT

<(-_-)> Teh mokey is not amused

This thread has happened before. I got into a huge arguement about how the flood were superior to the 'nids. Overall though 40k would probably win because it is so stupidly overpowered.

However if by vs you mean the games rather than in a war, halo by a mile.

  • 09.28.2012 5:58 AM PDT


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: BIOHAZRED


Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically just means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.


Yes I am indeed a fanboy of Halo when it comes down to it there is not much that I don't know about it's universe. Though yes unless the chief went completely beast mode and got lucky beyond any luck that has ever existed then yes 40K would win.


A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).


The fear of death and decay will make Nurgle stronger. This isn't just the Chaos Gods vs Precursors. The Imperial Gaurd alone could probably sustain Nurgle during the conflict, there are that many people.

War would strengthen Khorne, and there would be plenty war to go around. It matters not from whom the blood flows but as long as it does Khone will survive.

The slightest feeling of pleasure, that moment of pride in a kill and it'd be going to Slannesh. Since the UNSC doesn't seem to have the strict indoctronation of the Imperium of Man i'd hazzard a guess and say that the UNSC would be quite vurnerable to Slannesh's forces, perhaps the covvies too?

Tzeench(?), ever plotting and scheming, always ahead. I doubt that Halo could do much against evil "space magic".

Tau... MJOLNIR? Pah... RAILGUNS!

'Nids? Worse than the flood, more numerous.

Necrons? Undead metal warriors who's most basic weapons screw up tanks and could destroy a planet in an instant if need be.

Space Marines, each chapter specialising in different manners and a single company outnumbers all Spartan IIs that have ever been.

There are many more things worthy of note and more detail but it's 3:20AM so that's all your getting from me.

  • 09.29.2012 7:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Captain Marvel solos.

But seriously, Halo is -blam!-ed.

  • 09.29.2012 9:50 PM PDT

I enjoy halo for it's story and when I am in the mood, its gameplay. Reach was significantly worse then I expected but was still a great game (minus the european hitscan fiasco). I am sitting on a two mile wide fence on the subject of halo 4. Most of the things I like a technical aspects though and not story or game play. Plus I am slightly mad they took my elites from MP.

40K wins by three lightyears.

  • 09.30.2012 6:56 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Da chief FWB

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: BIOHAZRED


Posted by: WEE MAN MJJC

Posted by: BIOHAZRED
Though I may not know much about 40K I do know that Master Chief has one MAJOR quality that overrules all other obsticles.. "Can you guess"?

Answer:To find answer look at capatal letters, this is in some form a spoiler.
lilll1!|LirhkdjdbdUndjxbCjdjdbKjdnfb

"Was I wrong"?


"Luck" just basically just means plot interest. Plot interest isn't factored, or even considered into vs debates. We analyse the challengers by feats, strength, powers etc. Tangible things like that.

OT: 40K roflstomp. Anyone that even contemplates voting for Halo is either a fanboy or retarded.


Yes I am indeed a fanboy of Halo when it comes down to it there is not much that I don't know about it's universe. Though yes unless the chief went completely beast mode and got lucky beyond any luck that has ever existed then yes 40K would win.


A fairer fight would be the ancients being included, which they totally are.

But 40K vs. Halo is one of those fights that is forced as a tie. Chaos Gods vs. Precursors is an undecidable fight, though Nurgle might be defeated. The other three are as immune to damage as far as I know, and the Precursors are likewise (which is why Nurgle could be defeated since nothing in the Precursor universe decays).


The fear of death and decay will make Nurgle stronger. This isn't just the Chaos Gods vs Precursors. The Imperial Gaurd alone could probably sustain Nurgle during the conflict, there are that many people.

War would strengthen Khorne, and there would be plenty war to go around. It matters not from whom the blood flows but as long as it does Khone will survive.

The slightest feeling of pleasure, that moment of pride in a kill and it'd be going to Slannesh. Since the UNSC doesn't seem to have the strict indoctronation of the Imperium of Man i'd hazzard a guess and say that the UNSC would be quite vurnerable to Slannesh's forces, perhaps the covvies too?

Tzeench(?), ever plotting and scheming, always ahead. I doubt that Halo could do much against evil "space magic".

Tau... MJOLNIR? Pah... RAILGUNS!

'Nids? Worse than the flood, more numerous.

Necrons? Undead metal warriors who's most basic weapons screw up tanks and could destroy a planet in an instant if need be.

Space Marines, each chapter specialising in different manners and a single company outnumbers all Spartan IIs that have ever been.

There are many more things worthy of note and more detail but it's 3:20AM so that's all your getting from me.


On even numbers, the flood is stronger.

But we dont know the flood numbers.

  • 09.30.2012 12:04 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3