- SuperCrack
- |
- Exalted Member
Jump feet first into hell!
Posted by: Mikelp_1
1: Just because they wanted it to feel more like Halo CE doesn't mean they actually succeeded in doing so.
2: Fast paced =/= Call of Duty pace. Halo 2 and 3 were fast paced, yet had shield systems and slower kill times than CoD. Reach, however, is the slowest Halo game to date. And you're the one with no views at different angles. Hmmm, how could groggy movement and aiming mechanics be a bad thing? Movement acceleration trashes quick changes in direction, which trashes strafing, which is a vital part of movement-based combat because half of the skill in playing Halo is being able to dodge bullets whilst you are hitting other opponents. The end result is not that of a strategic game of chess...
3: More bloom still generates many lucky circumstances and promotes unnecessary, class based combat (combat based upon decisions mindlessly made outside the game). Bloom at its core just makes the game awkward, slow, and random/luck-based, which isn't approved of in a [b]skill-based shooter; how much skill is involved in winning a game of heads-or-tails?[/b]
You're really not worth arguing beyond this point. You really should at least be somewhat decent at Halo if you want to make arguments based upon what competitive Halo gameplay is and should be like.
MORE bloom generates more consistency NOT RANDOMNESS in the long run but i do agree about the class based combat.
You are being punished with randomness when you don't abide to the rules of bloom.
And if you want to bring up randomness enjoy Halo 4 , brand new with RANDOM PERSONAL ORDNANCES , which can vary from a needler, to a one shot kill sniper rifle (binary rifle), to a REGULAR sniper(sense?), to a rocket launcher , etc....
Isn't that random mate?Yet Halo 4 will still succeed , proving my point that Reach acted as a frontline for people to accept the change.
Plus the community is so bad in this game that adding the Battle Rifle in the game can actually make people believe that the game is actually now good.
And to your last and quite stupid point.
So predictable you are you had to bring up my "rank".
You know I could have not used my real forum name right?
You know It could be another tag for my serious playing and this one just for split screen right?
If you can't believe and accept any of these situations and you are seriously so shallow and superficial to think that I have to display a good Halo 3 rank to you in order to participate to a good conversation about the skilled aspects of the game then I challenge you to play with me (be it Reach or Halo 3 ) on christmas that am getting back to my hometown.
According to your childish and shallow logic , people who are better than you are correct?
You do know that you can probably beat any of the developers balancing halo 4 weapons in the game right?
Yet they are the ones that balance the weapons.
My rank , and most correctly the one you see , has nothing to do with my knowledge about the game or my ability to think about it , so please do yourself a favor and use better logic than that next time.