- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: einx359
thats not proof that the Ark is not a safe haven from the Halos All your argument says is that there is no distinct proof that the Ark is a safe haven. That does't mean that it can't be. The idea of a safe haven comes from all the biblical references, and how the "ark" was the only place where people survived "the flood". That is where the idea comes from.
Also, Halo's do not kill life on the actual halo, meaning that the points of activation are safe. So, if being on a halo when you activate it means your safe, then it would make sense that being on the ark when activating it would mean you would be safe.
if things on the halo's aren't destroyed, then there could still be food for the flood, that just doesn't make sense that they wouldn't be killed if they are at an activation point.