- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: GAMER4EVER
Posted by: basbalfan55
When Bungie was interviewed about the Halo 3 trailer, the designers said that they stretched the horizon of real moving matter as far as they could "That's real stuff out there". They wouldn't waste weeks designing this epic scene, and have it NOT be the ark.
One more thing: "This is the way the world ends"
Does that not make it clear that the structure is the Ark, AND that it is activating the halos in the trailer?
Now, here's why the trailer gives away a major aspect of the conclusion of the game:
The reason that Bungie showed us the end of the world- the activation of all halos in the trailer, is because it WONT HAPPEN IN THE GAME. Trust me on this one. If the halos were activated at the end of Halo 3, then they MOST CERTAINLY would NOT show us the activation of the halos in a trailer. Bungie knew this, but still wanted us to see what the activation of all the halos would look like. Because of this, the world will NOT end in the game, and besides, if the world ended in the game, how is that a good ending?
Any thoughts?
Thoughts? You are a complete moron. They spent all that time on the trailer because it was the Ark? So, what you're saying if it was a trailer of the chief only, they wouldn't bother?
How do you know the whole earth isn't the Ark, and that the artifact isn't just part of it? If the Ark is activated, it doesn't necessairly mean the Halos are activated... (if they were destroyed or disabled)
Next time, don't go parading around like you're the king.
ya, ok. I dont think its possible for you to be any more arrogant and condesending in one post than you just did. Seriously, if you have any THOUGHTS, please kindly post them. That doesnt mean going on a tirade about how you think everyone who doesnt think the same way as u is "parading around like a king".
[Edited on 6/27/2006]