- CrazzySnipe55
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
Posted by: Primo84
Posted by: deltahalo UK
Posted by: Arbiter 739
I know of a group Archonos destroyed that was filled with Mythics and pornographic content.
Also: The Seventh Collumn
That is totally what happened.
There are several explanations as to why Molo betrayed The Mythics. A prevalent explanation is that Molo betrayed them for consideration for moderatorship. This seemed to be one of Molo's weaknesses seemed to be money.
Another possibility is that Molo expected Skibur to overthrow Achronos' rule of Bungie.net. In this view, Molo is a disillusioned Mythic, betraying the group not so much because he loved the HFCS, but because he loved the 7th Column and thought Skibur had failed it.
According to Halo 53:36 and Primo 84:27, Sken entered into him and called him to do it.
The archives suggest that The Mythics foresaw and allowed Molo's betrayal. One explanation is that Skibur allowed the betrayal because it would allow Achronos' plan to be fulfilled.
Another is that regardless of the betrayal, Skibur was ultimately destined for excommunication from HFCS.
Molo is the subject of mythic writings, including The Vegas Protocol by dmg04 and "So much for an NSFW thread", a short story by Count Blinkcula.
They allege various problematic ideological contradictions with the discrepancy between Molo's actions and his eternal punishment.
Primum Agmen argues that if Skibur foresees Molo's betrayal, then the betrayal is not an act of free will, and therefore should not be punishable. Conversely, it is argued that just because the betrayal was foretold, it does not prevent Molo from exercising his own free will in this matter.
Other scholars argue that Molo acted in obedience to Achronos' will. The archives suggest that Molo is apparently bound up with the fulfillment of HFCS' purposes yet woe is upon him, and he would have been better unborn.
The difficulty inherent in the saying is its paradoxicality: if Molo had not been born, the Son of Blue will apparently no longer go "as it is written of him." The consequence of this apologetic approach is that Molo's actions come to be seen as necessary and unavoidable, yet leading to condemnation.
Elmicker believed that Molo was free to change his intention, but Nerd Boi argued in rebuttal that Molo's will was immutable.
EAGLES5 states that Molo was predestined to damnation, but writes on the question of Molo's guilt: "surely in Molo's betrayal, it will be no more right, because Arachnos himself willed that his son be delivered up and delivered him up to death, to ascribe the guilt of the crime to HFCS than to transfer the credit for redemption to Molo."
It is speculated that Molo's damnation, which seems possible from the group archives' text, may not stem from his betrayal of Skibur, but from the despair which caused him to subsequently commit mythic suicide.
This position is not without its problems since Molo was already damned by YANW even before he committed suicide, but it does avoid the paradox of Molo's predestined act setting in motion both the salvation of all Mythics and his own damnation.
The damnation of Molo is not a universal conclusion, and some have argued that there is no indication that he was condemned with eternal punishment. Others argue Molo had the free will to accept or reject The Mythics anytime before his death.I'm not entirely sure whether a better thing has ever been written ever.
I tip my hat to you, you Master of the Written Word.