Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo vs Star Wars, including halo 4
  • Subject: Halo vs Star Wars, including halo 4
Subject: Halo vs Star Wars, including halo 4

oh my god


Posted by: Helljumper427
fortress superlaser= one shot. they can always make more.

and thats all your saying is that you got precurors, fortess and spartans. While i could name hundreds of things star wars got.

  • 11.12.2012 2:45 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt



Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: RockdaleRooster

Posted by: RockdaleRooster

Posted by: Helljumper427


Also if humans leave behind a plate of steel and ants find it and they can't destroy it. Does that mean it's indestructible?[/quote]

remeber that forerruners are more advanced than ants. and the indetructible material was esstentially their concrete. you can bet that they make their ships out of something much stronger. [/quote]
But can you prove they do? Where is the hard evidence proving this? All that is known about the Precursors comes from that one sentence. How do you know they even had ships? Or weapons? Or that they could indeed make species at will? If you read that tier 0 thing it says it's "theoretical". Theoretical meaning existing only in theory. Not practicality.


go read halo:cryptum. all of these are mentioned, and it's rather obvious that a speices that advanced has weapons and ships. don't deny that.

I've read Cryptum and no where does it say the Precurors had weapons or ships. All they know they had were "indestructible ruins" that can be blown up by a Halo. Until you can prove with evidence that the precursors had any kind of ships or weaponry your precursor arguments are not valid and hold no weight. Everything we've stated can be backed up with facts and proof from Star Wars. All of yours is just your speculation.


so are you saying precurors are just ruins in a single locations. So what if were fighting somewhere were a precuror isnt located?


now you're just being stupid.

  • 11.12.2012 2:45 PM PDT

oh my god


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt
Oh yeah star wars also has the world devestator which puts a beam around the planet and blocks everything from entering or leaving than when it fully charges it destroys all life and makes the planet ash. I think this beats the composer. Theres also the shock drum which destroys a planets core and the power guard which is like spartans.

Go play TOR so much super weapons.


one word: HALO

-Centerpoint Station.
-Corsair.
-Sun Razer.
-Ascendant Spear.
-Planet Prison.
-Shock Drum.
-Death mark.
-Alderaanian Superweapon.
-Conqueror.
-Baradium fission device.
-Baradium missile.
-Cosmic Turbine.
-Darksaber.
-Dark Reaper.
-Desolator.
-Death Star I.
-Death Star II.
-Devastation.
-Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Eye of Palpatine.
-Electro-proton bomb.
-Galaxy Gun.
-The Gauntlet.
-Gravitic polarization beam.
-Hyperspace Collisions.
-Interplanetary Ion Cannon.
-Ion Ring.
-Kumauri Battleship.
-Mass Shadow Generator.
-Malevolence.
-Omega Frost.
-Orbital Nightcloak.
-Planechanga.
-Planet-cracking missile.
-Planet Killer.
-Shawken Device.
-Silencer.
-Sovereign-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Star Forge.
-Starkiller.
-Sun Crusher.
-Tarkin.
-Thought bomb.
-Undying.
-World Devastator.
-Yo'gand's Core.

thank you see OP i think you lost.

  • 11.12.2012 2:46 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt
so are you saying precurors are just ruins in a single locations. So what if were fighting somewhere were a precuror isnt located?

The only thing known about the Precursors are that they left a bunch of ruins lying around. Buildings. Nothing about ships, fighters, weaponry, vehicles or anything.

  • 11.12.2012 2:46 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"


Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
halo pwns star wars with precursors and forerruners./end thread

precursors are indestructible to the things known in the halo universe. Death star can destroy. Also the silencer from SWTOR can destroy entire fleets with 1 shot. Then star wars has the vong to counter the flood. Not to mention the star wars known galaxy is 10x bigger than halos.


a forerunner fortress could destroy the death star with single shot from its superlaser. the death star can only target one thing at a time.

You seem to be thinking the super laser is the Death Stars only weapon.
Weapons:
-5,000 D6 turbolaser batteries.
-5,000 XX-9 heavy turbolasers.
-2,500 L-s 4.9 laser cannons.
-2,500 MS-1 ion cannons.
-SB-920 Laser Cannons. (unknown amount.)
-Charged-particle blasters. (unknown amount.)
-Magnetic railgun. (unknown amount.)
-Proton torpedo banks. (unknown amount.)
-Surface cannon.

Other:
-7,000 starfighters.
-4 strike cruisers.
-3,600 Assault shuttles.
-1,860 dropships.
-25,984 stormtroopers.
-There would be escorts of Star Destroyers.

out of curiosity are these numbers for fisrt or 2nd death star?

First.

  • 11.12.2012 2:46 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
fortress superlaser= one shot. they can always make more.

and thats all your saying is that you got precurors, fortess and spartans. While i could name hundreds of things star wars got.


precursors empire is bigger than star wars alone, not even including the forerruners. the fortress is the most powerful forerruner ship. and i never used spartans in my argument.

  • 11.12.2012 2:47 PM PDT

DISREGARD

[Edited on 11.12.2012 2:50 PM PST]

  • 11.12.2012 2:48 PM PDT


Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
fortress superlaser= one shot. they can always make more.

and thats all your saying is that you got precurors, fortess and spartans. While i could name hundreds of things star wars got.


precursors empire is bigger than star wars alone, not even including the forerruners. the fortress is the most powerful forerruner ship. and i never used spartans in my argument.

The Star Wars Universe spans 5 galaxies. Halo is 1. You don't know if the Precursors did have multi-galaxy Empire or even what the extent of their Empire was or even if they had one.

  • 11.12.2012 2:49 PM PDT

oh my god

go read the sun crusher alone on the list and you will see why star wars wins.

  • 11.12.2012 2:49 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt
Oh yeah star wars also has the world devestator which puts a beam around the planet and blocks everything from entering or leaving than when it fully charges it destroys all life and makes the planet ash. I think this beats the composer. Theres also the shock drum which destroys a planets core and the power guard which is like spartans.

Go play TOR so much super weapons.


one word: HALO

-Centerpoint Station.
-Corsair.
-Sun Razer.
-Ascendant Spear.
-Planet Prison.
-Shock Drum.
-Death mark.
-Alderaanian Superweapon.
-Conqueror.
-Baradium fission device.
-Baradium missile.
-Cosmic Turbine.
-Darksaber.
-Dark Reaper.
-Desolator.
-Death Star I.
-Death Star II.
-Devastation.
-Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Eye of Palpatine.
-Electro-proton bomb.
-Galaxy Gun.
-The Gauntlet.
-Gravitic polarization beam.
-Hyperspace Collisions.
-Interplanetary Ion Cannon.
-Ion Ring.
-Kumauri Battleship.
-Mass Shadow Generator.
-Malevolence.
-Omega Frost.
-Orbital Nightcloak.
-Planechanga.
-Planet-cracking missile.
-Planet Killer.
-Shawken Device.
-Silencer.
-Sovereign-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Star Forge.
-Starkiller.
-Sun Crusher.
-Tarkin.
-Thought bomb.
-Undying.
-World Devastator.
-Yo'gand's Core.

thank you see OP i think you lost.


you can't base victory off super weapons. and we don't know how many superweapons the precursors have.

  • 11.12.2012 2:49 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt
go read the sun crusher alone on the list and you will see why star wars wins.


the sun crusher alone won't kill all the precusors.

  • 11.12.2012 2:51 PM PDT

oh my god


Posted by: Helljumper427
you can't base victory off superweapons. and we don't know how many precursor weapons there are.


says the one that said the halo rings to me earlier. Im pretty sure in your first post you said ALL of star wars.

  • 11.12.2012 2:51 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"


Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
halo pwns star wars with precursors and forerruners./end thread

precursors are indestructible to the things known in the halo universe. Death star can destroy. Also the silencer from SWTOR can destroy entire fleets with 1 shot. Then star wars has the vong to counter the flood. Not to mention the star wars known galaxy is 10x bigger than halos.


a forerunner fortress could destroy the death star with single shot from its superlaser. the death star can only target one thing at a time.

You seem to be thinking the super laser is the Death Stars only weapon.
Weapons:
-5,000 D6 turbolaser batteries.
-5,000 XX-9 heavy turbolasers.
-2,500 L-s 4.9 laser cannons.
-2,500 MS-1 ion cannons.
-SB-920 Laser Cannons. (unknown amount.)
-Charged-particle blasters. (unknown amount.)
-Magnetic railgun. (unknown amount.)
-Proton torpedo banks. (unknown amount.)
-Surface cannon.

Other:
-7,000 starfighters.
-4 strike cruisers.
-3,600 Assault shuttles.
-1,860 dropships.
-25,984 stormtroopers.
-There would be escorts of Star Destroyers.


forerruner fortress has all of that(Forerruner equivelents), plus more. only 7,000 fighters? four cruisers? that's nothing.

With the size of it I'm sure it has a lot more ships than what Wookiee gave me. Besides it doesn't need to carry all the much. When it's going to be escorted by a couple fleets of Star Destroyers. A New Hope was just plot. If it actually happened that movie would have ended in 5 minutes.

  • 11.12.2012 2:51 PM PDT


Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
you can't base victory off superweapons. and we don't know how many precursor weapons there are.


says the one that said the halo rings to me earlier. Im pretty sure in your first post you said ALL of star wars.


that was in a super weapons debate. an either way, just because you have something that can destroy a system does'nt mean you win instantly.

  • 11.12.2012 2:52 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"

Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt
Oh yeah star wars also has the world devestator which puts a beam around the planet and blocks everything from entering or leaving than when it fully charges it destroys all life and makes the planet ash. I think this beats the composer. Theres also the shock drum which destroys a planets core and the power guard which is like spartans.

Go play TOR so much super weapons.


one word: HALO

-Centerpoint Station.
-Corsair.
-Sun Razer.
-Ascendant Spear.
-Planet Prison.
-Shock Drum.
-Death mark.
-Alderaanian Superweapon.
-Conqueror.
-Baradium fission device.
-Baradium missile.
-Cosmic Turbine.
-Darksaber.
-Dark Reaper.
-Desolator.
-Death Star I.
-Death Star II.
-Devastation.
-Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Eye of Palpatine.
-Electro-proton bomb.
-Galaxy Gun.
-The Gauntlet.
-Gravitic polarization beam.
-Hyperspace Collisions.
-Interplanetary Ion Cannon.
-Ion Ring.
-Kumauri Battleship.
-Mass Shadow Generator.
-Malevolence.
-Omega Frost.
-Orbital Nightcloak.
-Planechanga.
-Planet-cracking missile.
-Planet Killer.
-Shawken Device.
-Silencer.
-Sovereign-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Star Forge.
-Starkiller.
-Sun Crusher.
-Tarkin.
-Thought bomb.
-Undying.
-World Devastator.
-Yo'gand's Core.

thank you see OP i think you lost.


you can't base victory off super weapons. and we don't know how many superweapons the precursors have.

Then why would you bring them up when we know next to nothing about the Precursors?

  • 11.12.2012 2:53 PM PDT

So from what I understand SW is retardadly OP? They seem to one super weapon for every man women and child...makes you how they haven't blown up the entire universe.

  • 11.12.2012 2:55 PM PDT

oh my god

In all honestly Halo would put up a good fight but in the end i think we all know star wars would be the victor here.

  • 11.12.2012 2:55 PM PDT


Posted by: BerzerkCommando

Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

[quote]Posted by: Helljumper427
halo pwns star wars with precursors and forerruners./end thread


a forerunner fortress could destroy the death star with single shot from its superlaser. the death star can only target one thing at a time.

You seem to be thinking the super laser is the Death Stars only weapon.
Weapons:
-5,000 D6 turbolaser batteries.
-5,000 XX-9 heavy turbolasers.
-2,500 L-s 4.9 laser cannons.
-2,500 MS-1 ion cannons.
-SB-920 Laser Cannons. (unknown amount.)
-Charged-particle blasters. (unknown amount.)
-Magnetic railgun. (unknown amount.)
-Proton torpedo banks. (unknown amount.)
-Surface cannon.

Other:
-7,000 starfighters.
-4 strike cruisers.
-3,600 Assault shuttles.
-1,860 dropships.
-25,984 stormtroopers.
-There would be escorts of Star Destroyers.


forerruner fortress has all of that(Forerruner equivelents), plus more. only 7,000 fighters? four cruisers? that's nothing.

With the size of it I'm sure it has a lot more ships than what Wookiee gave me. Besides it doesn't need to carry all the much. When it's going to be escorted by a couple fleets of Star Destroyers. A New Hope was just plot. If it actually happened that movie would have ended in 5 minutes.


the fortress is the forerruner command ship. in addition to what it carries, it has control over a massive fleet.

  • 11.12.2012 2:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
you can't base victory off superweapons. and we don't know how many precursor weapons there are.


says the one that said the halo rings to me earlier. Im pretty sure in your first post you said ALL of star wars.


that was in a super weapons debate. an either way, just because you have something that can destroy a system does'nt mean you win instantly.


If they can destroy a galaxy then they can take out all of Halo in one shot.

  • 11.12.2012 2:56 PM PDT

Country: United States.
State: Pennsylvania.
County: Warren.
I graduated from high school on June-11-2011. I'm 19 right now. I'm turning 20 in December. I like playing video games, and board games. I like reading Sci-Fi, and World War II novels, and what not.

"There is nothing better in the world than being better at a video game than someone else....oh wait"

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
you can't base victory off superweapons. and we don't know how many precursor weapons there are.


says the one that said the halo rings to me earlier. Im pretty sure in your first post you said ALL of star wars.

In the end that's what the Halo VS what ever comes down to. They either bring up the Precursors or the Halo array. Speaking of which. If you have to rely on a weapon that wipes out all live in the galaxy to win a war. You know that side was getting their asses handed to them.

  • 11.12.2012 2:56 PM PDT


Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt



Posted by: Helljumper427
Posted by: RockdaleRooster

Posted by: Helljumper427


Also if humans leave behind a plate of steel and ants find it and they can't destroy it. Does that mean it's indestructible?[/quote]

remeber that forerruners are more advanced than ants. and the indetructible material was esstentially their concrete. you can bet that they make their ships out of something much stronger. [/quote]
But can you prove they do? Where is the hard evidence proving this? All that is known about the Precursors comes from that one sentence. How do you know they even had ships? Or weapons? Or that they could indeed make species at will? If you read that tier 0 thing it says it's "theoretical". Theoretical meaning existing only in theory. Not practicality.[/quote]


go read halo:cryptum. all of these are mentioned, and it's rather obvious that a speices that advanced has weapons and ships. don't deny that.

I've read Cryptum and no where does it say the Precurors had weapons or ships. All they know they had were "indestructible ruins" that can be blown up by a Halo. Until you can prove with evidence that the precursors had any kind of ships or weaponry your precursor arguments are not valid and hold no weight. Everything we've stated can be backed up with facts and proof from Star Wars. All of yours is just your speculation.


so are you saying precurors are just ruins in a single locations. So what if were fighting somewhere were a precuror isnt located?


now you're just being stupid.


1) Precursors traveled amongst galaxies, and amongst them, whole star systems. Trying to deny they have ships is like trying to deny the airforce has planes.

2) They would create and destroy galactic civilizations like the Forerunners on a whim. They have weapons, one of which is the Flood.

  • 11.12.2012 2:56 PM PDT


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427

Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: Helljumper427


Go play TOR so much super weapons.[/quote]

one word: HALO

-Centerpoint Station.
-Corsair.
-Sun Razer.
-Ascendant Spear.
-Planet Prison.
-Shock Drum.
-Death mark.
-Alderaanian Superweapon.
-Conqueror.
-Baradium fission device.
-Baradium missile.
-Cosmic Turbine.
-Darksaber.
-Dark Reaper.
-Desolator.
-Death Star I.
-Death Star II.
-Devastation.
-Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Eye of Palpatine.
-Electro-proton bomb.
-Galaxy Gun.
-The Gauntlet.
-Gravitic polarization beam.
-Hyperspace Collisions.
-Interplanetary Ion Cannon.
-Ion Ring.
-Kumauri Battleship.
-Mass Shadow Generator.
-Malevolence.
-Omega Frost.
-Orbital Nightcloak.
-Planechanga.
-Planet-cracking missile.
-Planet Killer.
-Shawken Device.
-Silencer.
-Sovereign-class Super Star Destroyer.
-Star Forge.
-Starkiller.
-Sun Crusher.
-Tarkin.
-Thought bomb.
-Undying.
-World Devastator.
-Yo'gand's Core.

thank you see OP i think you lost.


you can't base victory off super weapons. and we don't know how many superweapons the precursors have.

Then why would you bring them up when we know next to nothing about the Precursors?


because they could easily exisist.

  • 11.12.2012 2:56 PM PDT






Posted by: Helljumper427
Posted by: RockdaleRooster

Posted by: Helljumper427


But can you prove they do? Where is the hard evidence proving this? All that is known about the Precursors comes from that one sentence. How do you know they even had ships? Or weapons? Or that they could indeed make species at will? If you read that tier 0 thing it says it's "theoretical". Theoretical meaning existing only in theory. Not practicality.[/quote][/quote]

go read halo:cryptum. all of these are mentioned, and it's rather obvious that a speices that advanced has weapons and ships. don't deny that.[/quote]
I've read Cryptum and no where does it say the Precurors had weapons or ships. All they know they had were "indestructible ruins" that can be blown up by a Halo. Until you can prove with evidence that the precursors had any kind of ships or weaponry your precursor arguments are not valid and hold no weight. Everything we've stated can be backed up with facts and proof from Star Wars. All of yours is just your speculation.[/quote]

so are you saying precurors are just ruins in a single locations. So what if were fighting somewhere were a precuror isnt located?


now you're just being stupid.


1) Precursors traveled amongst galaxies, and amongst them, whole star systems. Trying to deny they have ships is like trying to deny the airforce has planes.

2) They would create and destroy galactic civilizations like the Forerunners on a whim. They have weapons, one of which is the Flood.


thank you.

  • 11.12.2012 2:57 PM PDT

oh my god

even then the halo rings are only located in the halo galaxy so lighting one off is just going to kill yourself and the star wars galaxy unscrathced.

  • 11.12.2012 2:58 PM PDT


Posted by: BerzerkCommando
Posted by: newyankalt

Posted by: Helljumper427
you can't base victory off superweapons. and we don't know how many precursor weapons there are.


says the one that said the halo rings to me earlier. Im pretty sure in your first post you said ALL of star wars.

In the end that's what the Halo VS what ever comes down to. They either bring up the Precursors or the Halo array. Speaking of which. If you have to rely on a weapon that wipes out all live in the galaxy to win a war. You know that side was getting their asses handed to them.


the only reason they the forerruners lost to the flood was because the council made military decisions. i've said this before.

  • 11.12.2012 2:59 PM PDT