Posted by: Technoxious
Posted by: LiberatorOfMind
Posted by: Technoxious
Posted by: LiberatorOfMind
Posted by: Technoxious
Not a single one of those are scientific articles...are you retarded or something?That's because "scientific" articles are written by employees of pharmaceutical corporations.
No they're not, they're written by scientists, without which, you would not have a computer and would most likely have died from some disease that has since been cured. And the point of a scientific article is to allow for other groups to show repeatability. Who do you think funds scientific medical research?
There is no single source for scientific funding...there are both public and private sources. I don't really get your point. Even when a study or experiment is funded by a pharmaceutical company, that doesn't give them control over the study. And even if it did, it would have to be repeatable to be accepted by the scientific study, so if its altered, it would obviously not be repeatable.Pharmaceutical companies fund scientists to sway results in their favor. They can "repeat" the false results as many times as they want.