- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: tk421 8472
Posted by: yenraBdellikI
Posted by: tk421 8472
Hello everyone...Im new to this hole world...the Xbox world that is. I'v been a PS2 owner now for a long time(5yr) and got an Xbox just last christmas. I'v played H2 and it looks pretty good...but when I saw the H3 trailer I was like "wow...looks almost better than MGS4 or Killzone. but then...there was no gameplay footage in it whatsoever..."
1. Sony sucks
2. Actually the trailer was made with the Halo 3 engine so it will look exactly like the trailer
1:Sony dose not suck
2:Im quite sure it is but it would be nice to see some footage of the acual game...
Killzone2 was made(with the real engine) on an alfa Dev kit and ran at 5fps they just sped it up to 60fps for the vid. the final hardware should do just what they showed.
PS: forgive me for sounding "unfanboyish" to MS but Im viewing the counsole war from both sides...and sofar they seem quite eqal in graphics... I read about tonyhawks project 8,and MGS4 on PS3. I'v also seen Quake4 reviews for 360. Im just comparing the two to see which I should buy. PS3 comes with an HD Blue-Ray player and plays game at 1080p.
360 has an already large online colective. But which should I save for?? * Sony sucks
* oh yes, remember the killzone preview? I quote Sony "yes yes! that is rendered using the in game engine!" hmmm.... didn't look like that when it came out did it? my point is...
* Sony LIES
* The MGS4 preview is pre-rendered.
* Blu-Ray will not catch on. HD-DVD is about 1/4 the price, and M$ is releasing an Xbox 360 add on HD-DVD drive. Blu-Ray also has a 8/10 failure rate.
* Xbox 360 also plays at up to 1080i
* Sony lies.
* This is so incredibly off topic.