Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Should premarital sex be looked down upon?
  • Subject: Should premarital sex be looked down upon?
Subject: Should premarital sex be looked down upon?

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: DatDudeBV
Montreal typical.

That's not a thing.

  • 11.26.2012 4:53 PM PDT


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: MadMax888
Or we could just put me up against you.
Do you not read your own posts?


And in the sentence before that I was talking about pictures....Hmmm

Exactly. The PREVIOUS sentence. What, are you afraid to fight a tough guy like Marinade?


Yeah man Im terrified. I just wet my pants. Ive never even been in a fight and I weigh 70 pounds.

  • 11.26.2012 4:53 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: angryMan69
Well it is just a step up from paying a prostitute in a way (not saying your friends are prostitutes) in that it is just pure business.

A prostitute will sleep with anyone for the right price. A friend with benefits is a friend that you sleep with. They aren't just going to go around hoping in bed with anyone. I admit that some of the women I've had one night stands with quite possibly would, but I don't particularly care about whether they like to sleep around or not.

  • 11.26.2012 4:54 PM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: MadMax888
Or we could just put me up against you.
Do you not read your own posts?


And in the sentence before that I was talking about pictures....Hmmm

Exactly. The PREVIOUS sentence. What, are you afraid to fight a tough guy like Marinade?


Yeah man Im terrified. I just wet my pants. Ive never even been in a fight and I weigh 70 pounds.
That explains everything. 12 year-olds are usually afraid of grown ups.

  • 11.26.2012 4:54 PM PDT


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Montreal typical.

That's not a thing.


Its not?

  • 11.26.2012 4:54 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: DatDudeBV
No pictures. Typical. Montreal typical.

I get it you want fap material as the wife won't put out any more. Don't worry, send her my way. I'll satisfy her for you.

Also Montreal? What?

  • 11.26.2012 4:55 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: angryMan69
Well it is just a step up from paying a prostitute in a way (not saying your friends are prostitutes) in that it is just pure business.

A prostitute will sleep with anyone for the right price. A friend with benefits is a friend that you sleep with. They aren't just going to go around hoping in bed with anyone. I admit that some of the women I've had one night stands with quite possibly would, but I don't particularly care about whether they like to sleep around or not.
I did say it was a step up but when it becomes business is when sex begins to lose a close meaning especially when done a lot.

  • 11.26.2012 4:56 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
No pictures. Typical. Montreal typical.

I get it you want fap material as the wife won't put out any more. Don't worry, send her my way. I'll satisfy her for you.


Almost funny. Keep trying.

  • 11.26.2012 4:57 PM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Montreal typical.

That's not a thing.


Its not?

That doesn't make sense in this context.

  • 11.26.2012 4:59 PM PDT


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Montreal typical.

That's not a thing.


Its not?

That doesn't make sense in this context.


Sure it does. Its the internet, anything makes sense.

  • 11.26.2012 4:59 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Its not?

I actually agree with the refs calls there. Jagr trips over a guy that was sliding along the ice because he couldn't cut out of the way.

Couturier slashes the stick out of another players hand, a very obvious and well known penalty.

I'm not a fan of either team so I'd be pretty neutral in my analysis of that. Laviolette seems like he might have some investment in one of those teams.

But that's going a bit off topic, so I'm not going to comment on it any more.

  • 11.26.2012 4:59 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
Its not?

I actually agree with the refs calls there. Jagr trips over a guy that was sliding along the ice because he couldn't cut out of the way.

Couturier slashes the stick out of another players hand, a very obvious and well known penalty.

I'm not a fan of either team so I'd be pretty neutral in my analysis of that. Laviolette seems like he might have some investment in one of those teams.

But that's going a bit off topic, so I'm not going to comment on it any more.


Oh I agree. Im not a Flyers fan either. it was a good no call

  • 11.26.2012 5:00 PM PDT

Yo no fights in this thread!

  • 11.26.2012 5:00 PM PDT


Posted by: angryMan69
Yo no fights in this thread!


Noones fighting my man.

  • 11.26.2012 5:01 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
No pictures. Typical. Montreal typical.

I get it you want fap material as the wife won't put out any more. Don't worry, send her my way. I'll satisfy her for you.

Almost funny. Keep trying.

Hey, since you're the kind of person that would keep pictures of past one-night stands and friends with benefits, to reminisce on those lonely nights, I wouldn't be surprised if she got bored of you and wants something bigger and better.

[Edited on 11.26.2012 5:03 PM PST]

  • 11.26.2012 5:01 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
No pictures. Typical. Montreal typical.

I get it you want fap material as the wife won't put out any more. Don't worry, send her my way. I'll satisfy her for you.

Almost funny. Keep trying.

Hey, since you're the kind of person that would keep pictures of past one-night stands and friends with benefits, to reminisce on those lonely nights, I wouldn't be surprised if she got bored of you and wants something bigger and better.


But I dont keep pictures of my Ex's or of my drunk frathouse girls. I just found it funny that you would insult my wife and I over an internet forum when you dont know me personally. But hey, Some people just feel big over the anonymity of the internet. More power to ya buddy

  • 11.26.2012 5:05 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
No pictures. Typical. Montreal typical.

I get it you want fap material as the wife won't put out any more. Don't worry, send her my way. I'll satisfy her for you.

Almost funny. Keep trying.

Hey, since you're the kind of person that would keep pictures of past one-night stands and friends with benefits, to reminisce on those lonely nights, I wouldn't be surprised if she got bored of you and wants something bigger and better.
No -blam!- talking in my thread!

  • 11.26.2012 5:06 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: DatDudeBV
But I dont keep pictures of my Ex's or of my drunk frathouse girls. I just found it funny that you would insult my wife and I over an internet forum when you dont know me personally. But hey, Some people just feel big over the anonymity of the internet. More power to ya buddy

You seem to expect me to have them, so why wouldn't I assume that you would keep them? Why else would you expect me to have them?

Also I thought you said earlier that you waited until marriage as premarital sex is wrong? Though I will admit that may have been someone else.

Oh I just enjoy a good verbal sparring. Try not to take it too seriously. Though I was serious about the contortionist twin threesome. They were fun.

[Edited on 11.26.2012 5:09 PM PST]

  • 11.26.2012 5:09 PM PDT


Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
But I dont keep pictures of my Ex's or of my drunk frathouse girls. I just found it funny that you would insult my wife and I over an internet forum when you dont know me personally. But hey, Some people just feel big over the anonymity of the internet. More power to ya buddy

You seem to expect me to have them, so why wouldn't I assume that you would keep them? Why else would you expect me to have them?

Also I thought you said earlier that you waited until marriage as premarital sex is wrong?

Oh I just enjoy a good verbal sparring. Try not to take it too seriously. Though I was serious about the contortionist twin threesome. They were fun.


Im not taking it seriously. On the contrary, you were the one that took my initial comment too seriously.

It was obviously a joke. Why would I think people should be killed for having sex before marriage? I mean, I had premarital sex, most people do....

  • 11.26.2012 5:11 PM PDT

Like me? Love me? Got a crush? Follow me on Twitter

| Forum Rules | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct |

Nope.

  • 11.26.2012 5:12 PM PDT

No. Marriage should be looked down upon.

*runs away*

  • 11.26.2012 5:14 PM PDT


Posted by: x Lord Revan x
Nope.
Please do elaborate forum ninja.

  • 11.26.2012 5:14 PM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Marinade
Posted by: DatDudeBV
But I dont keep pictures of my Ex's or of my drunk frathouse girls. I just found it funny that you would insult my wife and I over an internet forum when you dont know me personally. But hey, Some people just feel big over the anonymity of the internet. More power to ya buddy

You seem to expect me to have them, so why wouldn't I assume that you would keep them? Why else would you expect me to have them?

Also I thought you said earlier that you waited until marriage as premarital sex is wrong?

Oh I just enjoy a good verbal sparring. Try not to take it too seriously. Though I was serious about the contortionist twin threesome. They were fun.


Im not taking it seriously. On the contrary, you were the one that took my initial comment too seriously.

It was obviously a joke. Why would I think people should be killed for having sex before marriage? I mean, I had premarital sex, most people do....

So you said something crazy just to incite an argument and angered response? At least you admit you're a troll.

  • 11.26.2012 5:15 PM PDT

If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friends.

The Flood Theory of Deterioration: q(p)=(qi)e^(-p/r)

Where q(p) is the quality of the thread as a function of p posts, (qi) is the inital quality of the first post, p is the amount of posts and r is the e-peen of the original poster.

Posted by: DatDudeBV
Im not taking it seriously. On the contrary, you were the one that took my initial comment too seriously.

It was obviously a joke. Why would I think people should be killed for having sex before marriage? I mean, I had premarital sex, most people do....

Thinks I took him seriously after I posted:
Posted by: Marinade
If you look at most of his posts he's a pretty obvious troll. I find it fun to goad him on and laugh at how serious and 'hard' he tries to act.

Shiggity diggity neighbourino.

  • 11.26.2012 5:15 PM PDT

No, there's no reason why it should be. (Unless we count religion, which we can't here.)

  • 11.26.2012 5:16 PM PDT