- Dback139
- |
- Senior Legendary Member
I am a pharmaceutical scientist. I received my Masters degree in Pharmaceutics from the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia in 2010, after working as a Pharmacist for 4 years. I currently work in King of Prussia, PA, and focus on the analytical chemistry of small molecule APIs. My clients include some of the most well known big pharma companies in the world.
Posted by: Not Snake
Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Yet there was no large outcry against Halo 3. Reach was way worse than anything ever seen reaction wise, Halo 4 is its own category. At least reach threads dominating the reach forum made sense. It takes a lot of anger to dominate the off topic forum.
Well to be fair, Reach had its own forum here. Halo 4 has Waypoint and a few scattered private groups here. Of course we all know what happens to dissenters in Waypoint.Same thing on the 343i forum. A kid commented that he was good (2.0 k/d) at H4, and was constantly winning games and then went on to say the game is unfair in matchmaking and that he's always going negative and losing....lolwut.
So I explained to him the contradiction, and I was banned for "derailing the conversation". This was after he sent me PM's telling me to "suck it" and "gtfo", among other things, and yet he reported me. Congratulations, Flood, the nuclear relationship we all have has miraculously prevailed.
EDIT: H3 totally had a ton of hate against it when it first released. It wasn't "Halo 2" and it was "dumbed down for noobs". Although I will concede that most of the complaints melted away. I think H4 is good, but I now believe that H3 was the most "complete" Halo game. H2's multiplayer is on just such a legendary status that I can't even compare it objectively to anything else.
[Edited on 11.29.2012 5:21 AM PST]